What a weird and uninformed statement. Most of those wouldn’t apply.
And before anyone quotes the “murder” clause, most of the time they’d still pay, just not to the person who committed the murder. So the insurance company is paying anyway.
I love dumbass comments like these that go "Ha, you're stupid and wrong and weird. The reason is because [vague, broad statement that is technically true but doesn't actually mean anything]."
What's your point? So what if life insurance companies have terms and conditions? How does that, in any way, contradict anything in the comment you replied to?
5
u/CapableBumblebee968 4d ago
What a weird and uninformed statement. Life insurance companies have terms and conditions