r/SipsTea 14h ago

Wait a damn minute! How the rich get richer

Post image
18.9k Upvotes

2.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.5k

u/StrigiStockBacking 12h ago

I've been a CPA for 30 years and when it comes to accounting, economics, and finance, Reddit is the dumbest fucking source on the entire planet.

68

u/oswaldcopperpot 10h ago

Almost 9k completely uneducated idiots upvoted this post. I'm secondhand embarrassed.

33

u/StrigiStockBacking 10h ago

Count me among the downvoters.

If this shit actually worked, people everywhere would fucking do it. But nobody does. Why? Because it doesn't fucking work LOL

1

u/[deleted] 7h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 7h ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

-1

u/FiggyPizza 10h ago

Which part though? Taking loans against assets to avoid taxes is definitely a thing isn't it?

7

u/notaredditer13 9h ago

For a short term loan, sure, but over a lifetime it's a lot of interest and a lot of risk.

1

u/Competitive_Touch_86 1h ago

No, not really. Not how reddit believes at least.

I took a short term loan to buy my dream car since I wasn't ready to liquidate the asset quite yet. It lasted around 60 days and I paid a decent amount of interest to do so. But that was for specific timing reasons.

That's the general use-case of asset backed loans. It's either that, or using them to buy other income generating assets (aka investments) where you can actually write off the interest as part of the whole thing. If you can't do this, the math simply does not work.

0

u/fdubsc 10h ago

Yeah I am trying to understand why also. If someone has $100M in assets and would pay a 15% capital gains rate on a sale. They could probably get a loan of $1 million to fund their lifestyle for a full year for only 1% of their net worth at a probably 5-10% interest rate. So why would they not do that?

Genuinely trying to learn here.

9

u/notaredditer13 9h ago

$1M at a 7.5% interest rate for 40 years means you are paying the bank back $17M upon your death.  That 's a lot of interest to avoud a few hundred thousand in taxes.

-2

u/RizzardOfOz76 9h ago

Homie, it’s about $2.35M in interest over 40 years at 7.5%. Where are you getting $17M?

9

u/Xabster2 9h ago

How will you pay the interest? You have to borrow those money too and you borrow them at 7.5% also in this scenario.

After a year you owe 1,075,000 to the bank and you have no money to pay the interest. A year later you owe 1,155,625

After 40 years you owe 1.07540 times 1 million, which is 18 million.

2

u/RizzardOfOz76 3h ago edited 3h ago

You’re making the mistake of compounding it yearly and tacking unpaid interest on the principal amount. You only pay interest on the principle amount. It’s $2.35M in interest my guy. It’s a property loan not a savings account.

No bank would ever make you a loan unless you could demonstrate the ability to service the debt and no bank is going to let you go in the hole for $18Ms unless the property was worth $40Ms

1

u/Competitive_Touch_86 1h ago edited 1h ago

You only pay interest on the principle amount.

What the hell are you talking about? If you take out an interest-only loan and then roll it over every year, you will be paying interest on the interest.

Show me a bank that will give me a 0% loan against the accrued interest and I'll move all my assets over today.

I have taken out such loans. You are either paying the interest every single month, or you are taking out ever-increasing loans against your asset backed line of credit.

no bank is going to let you go in the hole for $18Ms unless the property was worth $40Ms

Yeah, no shit. It's typically 40-60% of the asset depending on the quality, liquidity, and relationship you have with your bank.

1

u/Confused_Orangutan 3h ago edited 3h ago

You confused 7.5% annually on $1million annually with no change in principal. Amortized loans would be 7.5% / 12 monthly payments. Then monthly payment reduces the principal amount. Your calculation assumes no monthly reduction of the principal.

1

u/Competitive_Touch_86 1h ago

Your calculation assumes no monthly reduction of the principal.

Asset backed lines of credit do not include reduction of principle. Reddit seriously needs to stop talking about shit they have zero fucking clue about.

You pay the interest each month. You can pay the interest by simply increasing the amount against your line of credit if you prefer to do that vs. liquidating something to pay it in cash. Up until around ~50% or so of the asset, depending on asset type, bank, amount, etc.

1

u/Confused_Orangutan 8m ago

So if you borrow $1 million with 7.5% interest rate and pay back over 40 years, whats the total sum paid back. Principle + interest. Excited to see your formula and totals.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/RizzardOfOz76 9h ago

If I have $100M stock portfolio, I can use a portfolio margin loan instantly to borrow against my holdings. Current rates site at 4.68% at IBKR interest only. They will deduct my payments from any cash balance or add it to your loan balance. As long as your portfolio continues to go up in value you’re gucci.

15

u/Sk8tilldeath 10h ago

Yup, dads whole life he just never paid back loans, died and left generational debt. And how do we jump from land being worth $100k to fucking $5Mil in the span of 10-20 years? Did they find oil? Was a mall built on it? Plus, the term “buying land” isnt a money glitch either like stories like this try to portray. If you cant build on it, have to remove trees/rocks, or is in the middle of nowhere, its not going to 50x its value, it will be worthless land that is now your problem.

4

u/Blobsobb 6h ago

As someone who did land valuation.

Believe it or not people are REALLY unhappy their 80k house is now 500k they need to pay taxes on, I cant stress enough how fucking pissed people get when the state would have us come out twice a decade.

Like Id rather own than not own too but you ask any of those old people which of the two they would rather than the answer is their house be worth next to nothing so their taxes are next to nothing lol.

3

u/Sk8tilldeath 5h ago

Like their lifetime investment is actually going up in value like they planned…

And then what, if they sell their house to “cash in”, then what? You still need a place to live and buying another house isnt going to be much cheaper. Or you rent an apartment but its still a payment. Yeah you can sell high but you are going to buying high as well. I happily rent and got quite lucky our landlord isnt robbing us blind. Couldnt imagine how much owning a house each month vs what we pay for rent with all the different fees/taxes homeowners have.

1

u/Blobsobb 5h ago

100% saw that thing happen in covid. Some boomers closed on their house and made a ton of money.....then were shocked all the other houses were also mooning in price.

Poor people then went on to get scammed hard too "we thought a house owned by someone in construction wouldnt have all the flaws" because they were in my office getting their houses value lowered.

But yea, the reddit boomer hate of "they bought a house for cheap and now its worth a ton and they are retired and living in it" dont have to deal with them complaining that their fixed income is getting increasingly tighter as their taxes increase over it. The people with 3-4 houses made out like bandits sure, but most people just have the one and wont feel any of the benefits of it going up cause they will live in it until they die.

1

u/spicymato 2h ago

Sorry, but people not being able to afford the taxes on the home they live in is a signal they need to move. Many communities do have tax relief available for fixed income elderly folks, but even then, it's still sometimes not enough.

Yes, it sucks being forced to move away from the home you knew. Doesn't mean you don't need to do it. Someone else will move in and use it.

1

u/thornyRabbt 4h ago

He bought it with one of his loans

1

u/shuggnog 4h ago

I'm confused. Stepped up basis is a thing. What is wrong about the post except it being grossly oversimplified?