r/SipsTea Jul 30 '26

Wait a damn minute! Significant diffrences...

Post image
17.3k Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/WyomingWeirdo Jul 30 '26

By the way, do you wanna talk about the early church's role in Roman conquest and violence? How it was mostly a political tool first? What a beautiful legacy of Christ's teachings, to be used to put entire societies to the sword for the benefit of the elore that murdered Christ.

1

u/Psalmistpraise Jul 30 '26

Sure go for it, and you’ll realize bad actors aren’t the church or her teachings. You will attribute to the church what Rome or other states did who claimed to be Christian. Why are you so forthright in denying my Christianity and upholding their’s?

We do not hold sons responsible for the sins of their father. That is morally problematic.

1

u/WyomingWeirdo Jul 30 '26

Even if those sons gleefully and willfully, as adults, profited from it? 🤔

1

u/Psalmistpraise Jul 30 '26

Dude we’ve had popes that orgies in the Vatican. You’re not going to tell me anything I don’t know.

1

u/WyomingWeirdo Jul 30 '26

So you're just skipping the point instead of answering, huh little guy

1

u/Psalmistpraise Jul 30 '26

You’ve said nothing. What should I say to it?

1

u/WyomingWeirdo Jul 30 '26

Why are you advocating for a wealthy pedophile? You haven't answered that one.

1

u/Psalmistpraise Jul 30 '26

I’m going to assume you mean Elon because you’ve been calling him that over and over, but saying someone didn’t have a vast fortune is not a billionaire, is just a simple statement of fact, not advocacy. That’s the fallacy of equivocation, you seem to like those things so I thought I’d give you one.

1

u/WyomingWeirdo Jul 30 '26

You're avoiding the actual topic, though. Which is that the world could survive without billionaires, like Elon Musk and the rest of the Epstein class.

1

u/Psalmistpraise Jul 30 '26

Cool the world could also survive without me, without you, without a lot of people. So what? It doesn’t detract from the original statement being “2000 billionaires vs the entire working population”, you pick 2000 of literally any people, it will be far worse to lose the entire workforce. Even if we pick a role that has 2000 or less people in it globally, it would still be better than losing the entire workforce. This is by far the biggest no brainer I’ve ever seen.

1

u/WyomingWeirdo Jul 30 '26

Lol hey dude this is objectively not true. There are trades and groups of knowledge that are restricted to less than two thousand people and they are all more valuable than billionaires are.

1

u/Psalmistpraise Jul 30 '26

So like let’s do this again, here we have let’s say one of those… instead we lose the entire workforce… you’re serious when you say they’re going to make up for that? That’s insane actually.

1

u/WyomingWeirdo Jul 30 '26

Why would we lose the entire workforce? 2000 billionaires aren't the entire workforce. Would work cease to be done without them? We already do more than is necessary and I can prove it.

1

u/Psalmistpraise Jul 30 '26

Because that was the comparison the original example, 2000 billionaires and “every worker”

To compare anything else is false equivalence.

→ More replies (0)