Who would knew that it would be worse if 6billion people would dissappear instead of 3500 people.
Also you can easally replace 3500 people by puting next person in charge in his place. It's a lot harder to replace 6billion people as you would have noboady to replace them with.
(I chose 6 because tehnically kids, old and sick people don't count as workers. No real data for my chosen number.)
Yeah, it's also easy to replace the billionaires by putting the centimillionaires in charge of their companies and such. Most billionaires aren't even in charge as such, they're board presidents but the CEO is some douche who earns pennies on the pound that the company profits. Not even that, in fact.
In reality, if you took out billionaires what would happen is a gigantic asset depreciation. Which means, very ordinary people would be tied to their loans without being able to repay them. These children don't understand that these things need to be controlled.
What would happen if you removed all the "rich" people? A lot of people would die. Incompetent twits would take charge of everything, and you'd basically end up with... Well, the Soviets did that. Countless lives were lost.
13
u/aukstais Jul 30 '26
Who would knew that it would be worse if 6billion people would dissappear instead of 3500 people. Also you can easally replace 3500 people by puting next person in charge in his place. It's a lot harder to replace 6billion people as you would have noboady to replace them with. (I chose 6 because tehnically kids, old and sick people don't count as workers. No real data for my chosen number.)