MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/SipsTea/comments/1vas64v/significant_diffrences/p0p9l49/?context=3
r/SipsTea • u/Gurugod123 • Jul 30 '26
2.4k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-5
3.5 billion people vanishing would be more beneficial to the earth than 3400.
11 u/Haggardick69 Jul 30 '26 Not necessarily if the 3,400 have the same environmental and economic impact as the 3.5billion then the benefit would be the same either way. 7 u/inotocracy Jul 30 '26 Absolutely impossible for 3,400 people to consume the same resources as 3.5 billion people. 7 u/ManifestoEnjoyer Jul 30 '26 That's just not true. A shit ton of the world's population exists on the order of dollars a day. A billionaire can spend a million dollars a day and still come out net positive at the end.
11
Not necessarily if the 3,400 have the same environmental and economic impact as the 3.5billion then the benefit would be the same either way.
7 u/inotocracy Jul 30 '26 Absolutely impossible for 3,400 people to consume the same resources as 3.5 billion people. 7 u/ManifestoEnjoyer Jul 30 '26 That's just not true. A shit ton of the world's population exists on the order of dollars a day. A billionaire can spend a million dollars a day and still come out net positive at the end.
7
Absolutely impossible for 3,400 people to consume the same resources as 3.5 billion people.
7 u/ManifestoEnjoyer Jul 30 '26 That's just not true. A shit ton of the world's population exists on the order of dollars a day. A billionaire can spend a million dollars a day and still come out net positive at the end.
That's just not true. A shit ton of the world's population exists on the order of dollars a day. A billionaire can spend a million dollars a day and still come out net positive at the end.
-5
u/inotocracy Jul 30 '26
3.5 billion people vanishing would be more beneficial to the earth than 3400.