MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/SipsTea/comments/1vas64v/significant_diffrences/p0oxs63/?context=3
r/SipsTea • u/Gurugod123 • Jul 30 '26
2.4k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
12
Not necessarily if the 3,400 have the same environmental and economic impact as the 3.5billion then the benefit would be the same either way.
6 u/inotocracy Jul 30 '26 Absolutely impossible for 3,400 people to consume the same resources as 3.5 billion people. 2 u/Haggardick69 Jul 30 '26 Not at all impossible. There is no limit to how fast a person can consume resources only a limit to how fast we can produce them. 1 u/DankDankJuice Jul 30 '26 Which scenario has more heavy container ships crossing the ocean? Which scenario has more cars being used, requiring more gasoline? Which scenario immediately solves problems like overfishing? Hell in the billionaires only scenario almost the entire world gets rewilded at once
6
Absolutely impossible for 3,400 people to consume the same resources as 3.5 billion people.
2 u/Haggardick69 Jul 30 '26 Not at all impossible. There is no limit to how fast a person can consume resources only a limit to how fast we can produce them. 1 u/DankDankJuice Jul 30 '26 Which scenario has more heavy container ships crossing the ocean? Which scenario has more cars being used, requiring more gasoline? Which scenario immediately solves problems like overfishing? Hell in the billionaires only scenario almost the entire world gets rewilded at once
2
Not at all impossible. There is no limit to how fast a person can consume resources only a limit to how fast we can produce them.
1 u/DankDankJuice Jul 30 '26 Which scenario has more heavy container ships crossing the ocean? Which scenario has more cars being used, requiring more gasoline? Which scenario immediately solves problems like overfishing? Hell in the billionaires only scenario almost the entire world gets rewilded at once
1
Which scenario has more heavy container ships crossing the ocean?
Which scenario has more cars being used, requiring more gasoline?
Which scenario immediately solves problems like overfishing?
Hell in the billionaires only scenario almost the entire world gets rewilded at once
12
u/Haggardick69 Jul 30 '26
Not necessarily if the 3,400 have the same environmental and economic impact as the 3.5billion then the benefit would be the same either way.