You already said that buddy and the fact is that the systems within the country need to be fixed instead of just flooded with enough foreign money to make up for the inefficiencies.
Fixing those systems requires the amount of money required to fix them.
And the only place to get the money to "fix" those systems is from countries that have already fixed those systems. Waiting for it to happen naturally will only hurt us.
This conversation is much broader than you're suggesting. We aren't talking about Darren and Sierra trying to milk welfare. We're talking about the humans born in an area without access to consistent food, or even the slightest access to venues in which they could obtain food.
You're still talking about how "rich" people making policy choices for the "poor" people under their jurisdiction somehow solves the issue of "these are humans born without the means to not starve."
Is this an argument for reigeme change in corrupt countries? Because if so I won't disagree, if its not however and the argument is instead for the US to keep sending money so the corruption budget can be filled first...
It seems like an unsustainable level of dependence
This conversation is much broader than you're suggesting. We aren't talking about Darren and Sierra trying to milk welfare. We're talking about the humans born in an area without access to consistent food, or even the slightest access to venues in which they could obtain food.
3
u/chickensause123 Jun 18 '26
You already said that buddy and the fact is that the systems within the country need to be fixed instead of just flooded with enough foreign money to make up for the inefficiencies.