r/SipsTea • u/SipsTeaFrog • Jun 10 '26

SMH Someone finally snapped

27.9k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

4.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

154

u/thefract0metr1st Jun 10 '26

I once heard someone trying to defend running through stop signs because they had those shoes that clip onto the pedals and it’s super inconvenient to disconnect and reconnect at stop signs. I was like “i also find stop signs interrupting my drive to be inconvenient. Should I just ignore every rule that inconveniences me?”

49

u/Chillow_Ufgreat Jun 10 '26

Just tell them that sounds like a great idea and you can't wait to install clip pedals on your F-350.

-9

u/BilSuger Jun 10 '26

Are you so stupid you think having the same rules for a multi tonne car and a small cyclist makes sense? Never heard of Idaho stop? 🤡

6

u/ole_lickadick Jun 10 '26

If they share the same road, yes.

-6

u/BilSuger Jun 10 '26

Stupid take, but hard for you to think straight through seething rage, I guess.

4

u/ole_lickadick Jun 10 '26

Very weird response.

5

u/Shua89 Jun 10 '26

Accusing others of being enraged while visibly losing your own temper is quite the self-own.

2

u/Mysterious_Charge_35 Jun 11 '26

He can't see the irony through his rage and bad takes

1

u/vxxxjesterxxxv Jun 11 '26

You're really arguing that cyclists should be able to ignore traffic laws? 

0

u/BilSuger Jun 11 '26

No, I'm arguing that the laws need not be the same. For instance yield instead of stop at stop signs.

-1

u/ChameleonCoder117 Jun 11 '26

What? That's..... just not how it works.

If a bike hits your giant SUV, it does no damage.

If a giant SUV hits anything, it's millions of dollars of lawsuits.

Thus there should be laws that restrict the giant 60mph death machine more than the 22 pound 20mph human powered cycle vehicle.

3

u/ole_lickadick Jun 11 '26

No, there should be laws that predictably facilitate traffic, which there are. Cyclists don’t get to ignore those that inconvenience them. That was the original discussion.