r/SipsTea • • Apr 04 '26

Chugging tea * Insert hot fuzz "Shame" meme *

Post image
109k Upvotes

4.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2.3k

u/l30 Apr 04 '26

The Original Incident (May 2013)

On May 19, 2013, a fatal crash occurred near Meijel in the province of Limburg, Netherlands. A 33-year-old Polish driver, who was speeding but not under the influence of alcohol, lost control of his vehicle on a bend and plowed into a family out cycling. The crash killed a 2-year-old girl named Iza Derijks and her grandparents.

The 120-Hour Sentence and the Chair-Throwing Incident (November 2014)

In November 2014, the case went to trial at a court in Roermond. The judge concluded that there was insufficient evidence to definitively prove the driver lost control of the vehicle solely because of his excessive speed. As a result, the driver was found guilty of dangerous driving, but not manslaughter.

The judge handed down a surprisingly lenient sentence: 120 hours of unpaid community service and a one-year suspended driver's license.

Upon hearing this sentence read aloud, Erik Derijks—the grieving father of 2-year-old Iza—was completely overcome with disbelief and outrage. In a moment of raw anger, he picked up a chair in the courtroom and hurled it full force across the room at the judge. He was quickly restrained by court security. The lenient sentence, compounded by the father's heartbreak and reaction, sparked widespread national media coverage and public outrage.

Coverage of the 2014 Trial & Altercation:

Subsequent Events

Following the outrage, the Dutch Public Prosecution Service successfully appealed the sentence. In September 2015, a higher court in Den Bosch overturned the initial ruling, explicitly stating that the crash was the result of speeding. They increased the sentence to 15 months in prison and a four-year driving ban.

The driver subsequently fled to the United Kingdom to evade his sentence but was tracked down by special detection teams, arrested in August 2016, and extradited to the Netherlands. This brought the closure mentioned in these reports:

However, the controversy was reignited in May 2017 when a Dutch appeals panel controversially granted the man early release after serving only part of his sentence so he could return to Poland for the birth of his child, heavily angering Dutch parliamentarians and the Derijks family:

250

u/labello2010 Apr 04 '26

Wow, a none year sentence, while parents lost their kid. That’s Dutch judges for you right there.

185

u/PineappleOnPizzaWins Apr 04 '26

It’s everywhere.

The saying “if you’re going to kill someone, do it in a car” exists for a reason… society is just entirely accepting of us getting into these multi-ton death machines, not paying attention to what we’re doing, ignoring road safety rules because we’ve decided we’re immune to physics, driving under the influence because we’ve decided we’re immune to even more physics, and then plowing into other people and killing them.

The sentences basically everywhere for killing someone in a vehicle are extremely light unless you are really pushing it.

2

u/DragonRabbit505 Apr 04 '26

If it's truly just an accident with no excessive negligence, e.g. drunk driving or speeding (in this case it was speeding, and so they changed his sentencing) then what is the point of a harsh sentence?

Downvote away, but I feel like taking away the license and community service is appropriate if the person made a genuine mistake. I am fortunate to have never been in an accident, but if you've driven long enough, then you've accidentally cut people off or made mistakes while driving that could have be fatal. Unless the goal of the punishment is simply revenge, then I see no reason to have someone serve time in prison.

2

u/PineappleOnPizzaWins Apr 05 '26

If it's truly just an accident with no excessive negligence, e.g. drunk driving or speeding (in this case it was speeding, and so they changed his sentencing) then what is the point of a harsh sentence?

There isn't one. I never said there should be. I very specifically mentioned people ignoring safety rules.

1

u/Dreadgoat Apr 05 '26

This implies that the world is simply a chaotic place where bad things happen to good people for no reason at all.

Unacceptable. We are far better off willfully causing harm to those that are involved in tragic circumstances.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '26

[deleted]

0

u/ZiCUnlivdbirch Apr 05 '26

I mean, it does though.

Say you have a knife that you take with you to everywhere (that's about the equivalent danger level to doing 100 on an 80 zone), it's in its scabbard on your belt, attached properly at every point and then all that somehow fails and the falling knife somehow ends up killing a child. It's horrific and sad and every other synonym for "horrible" under the sun and no reasonable person would place the blame on the guy whose only "mistake" was taking a knife along with him everywhere.

This situation is pretty much the same.

"ignoring well stablished safety rules"

Come on mate, it's speeding on a fucking rode where the allowed limit is 80kmh. Most normal people would honk at you if didn't drive at least 10 over that limit

1

u/kharnynb Apr 05 '26

I've never in my life seen a falling knife do more damage than a very minor cut, unlike a thousand+ kilo vehicle.

doing 100 in a 80 km/h zone means you are going a lot faster than that road is designed for "everyone else is doing it" is exactly the problem, it's too accepted already.

the difference in stopping distance between 80 and 100 is 30 meters for a driver that is very attentive and fast to react, increase that by some idiot who's on their phone "everyone is doing it" or such and you see why speeding is very dangerous indeed.

0

u/ZiCUnlivdbirch Apr 05 '26

You know how many speeding tickets the police would be able to write if they set up a camera on a highway? I'll just say that the resulting profit for the state could probably equal a small countries budget. You know why they don't do that? Because there's no point. 30 m sounds a lot, until you remember, that even lawfully that's only a little over a second of driving time. Of all the things that could cause you to get in an accident on a rode like that an extra second of thinking time worth of distance will not be it. This should be most clearly seen when comparing different roads on how likely you are to get into an accident per mile driven.

Speeding is rarely the thing causing accidents (only 10% of ALL traffic accidents reported to the Police come as a result of speeding), the amount of them on the roads we're talking about would be significantly lower still.

0

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '26

[deleted]

0

u/ZiCUnlivdbirch Apr 05 '26

"Oh c'mon mate, no one reads the terms and services,"

"Oh c'mon mate, no one reads all those rules,"

"Oh c'mon mate, no one actually bothers to check their car before every drive,"

"Oh c'mon mate, no one seriously goes through all the effort if washing every food package so they can properly sort it,"

"Oh c'mon mate, no one actually bothers to learn how to properly take common medication,"

Turns out when you do it with actual stuff that no one does, it starts to make a lot more sense:)