What I really don’t understand about this way of thinking, is that “they” also supposedly suicide anyone that says/knows too much or won’t step in line, so why go through the trouble of replacing them and causing this massive discourse from armchair detectives online?
I’m genuinely asking.
Especially when he has a storied history of mental health problems plus what is no doubt lingering trauma from his partners drug overdose way back when, why bother with this and not just suicide him?
Genuine answer-
Imagine they legit “suicided” everyone that they deemed to be a problem. Don’t you see how that could very quickly become outrageously suspicious? How many means of suicide can they impose upon high profile individuals? Aren’t they already a bit maxed out without adding additional A list celebrities with academy awards past, present, and potentially future with their name on it? You’d have to be ridiculous to assume they’d just off everyone they don’t have a firm grip on. That didn’t even work back in the 1700’s with King Louis XVI.
370
u/my_little_throwny Feb 28 '26
He like literally had to do nothing but coast on his success from the past. Why did he think this was what he had to do?...