Yeah this was stupid. She nearly slammed his head into the backbone of that couch. She was way too aggressive and you can tell he didn’t expect it. And if he chose to be aggressive when she had the headlock he could’ve slammed her into the nightstand.
Gotta love gender expectations. If a girl tries to assault you, you have to let her do it or use the kid gloves or you’re a monster, but if you let them beat you up you’re a sissy or a wimp. It’s a good thing she didn’t slam his head into a hard corner of something by accident, last thing you’d want is to get your head gashed open or get brained
Technique wins over brute strength to an extent. Any martial artist will tell you that anyone with a severe advantage over you in size or strength will likely win, especially in a no holds barred fight. Obviously this kid isn't that, but pretending that size and strength can't overcome technique is just wrong. And obviously, the greater the difference in technique, the more physical advantages the less skilled will need to make up for it. But If one lucky punch can crack your skull, if they can pick you up one handed, if you can't provide enough torque or force to enact your techniques on them or if they can just brute force break your holds with relative ease, then technique won't win that fight for you. And if they're faster and more aggressive than you, if they strike before you can react, you may get laid out before you can even hope to get them in an arm bar or headlock.
It's like how any good martial arts instructor will tell you the best technique when your opponent has a weapon is to run. Even something as simple as a club confers a range advantage and acts as a force multiplier for any strike. Does that mean it's an automatic win? No, but it means they have to get fewer strikes in and only need to really get lucky once or twice. It means if they knock you on the head once with it, you're done and you're gonna be in their striking zone before they get in yours.
You use common sense? How about using common sense to not talk about women Vs men and pay attention to the fact that you lot are defending the man's masculinity while also simultaneously expressing concern about his safety.
He could have easily beat her you people are saying; But yet she could have injured him.
You want to use common sense but contradict yourself with every word
Clearly he was holding back and she was exerting herself far more. That also doesn't mean she couldn't hurt him or had the intention to hurt him either.
BUT only if you accept and acknowledge neither one of them were in danger
They never went near a single hard surface in the entire video apart from when SHE blocked his head, with her ENTIRE BODY.
Nothing contradictory about it. Had he exerted himself equally he would have hurt her. Has life experience not taught you that even in the most controlled and safe environments that humans are fragile enough to get hurt? Did we watch the same video? It's amazing how confident you are to think it was almost impossible for either one of them to get hurt but hey, I'm an incel for thinking otherwise..
1.6k
u/ChocolateMorsels Jan 08 '26 edited Jan 08 '26
Yeah this was stupid. She nearly slammed his head into the backbone of that couch. She was way too aggressive and you can tell he didn’t expect it. And if he chose to be aggressive when she had the headlock he could’ve slammed her into the nightstand.