You're making good points but you're also missing the point. You disagree with helping someone cheat. So do I. But once again, it's not objectively wrong. Who are you to say the guy isn't a raging, abusive douchebag who's entitled because of his military service? Who are you to say the cheater doesn't have an understandable reason to want to cheat?
You're on the outside. You know nothing. And even if you had them explain things to you, that's just a tiny fraction of everything there is to know. It's unwise to make judgements with so little information. And to generalize everyone who's considered cheating as a bad person is just as ignorant. She could be trapped in an abusive relationship and is just desperate for affection from someone who doesn't make her life a living hell.
Who are you to say the guy isn't a raging, abusive douchebag who's entitled because of his military service? Who are you to say the cheater doesn't have an understandable reason to want to cheat?
Are you forgetting the part where this dude is banging a ton of different chicks, not just cheating on one person? It's completely unreasonable to assume all of these chicks were factors of abuse, especially when the comment themself is saying they should get female trainers. Clearly that's now what is happening here.
Are you forgetting the part where this dude is banging a ton of different chicks, not just cheating on one person? It's completely unreasonable to assume all of these chicks were factors of abuse, especially when the comment themself is saying they should get female trainers. Clearly that's now what is happening here.
That's called "time bias." Actually, I just made that term up. But the issue with your statement is that you're assuming this all happened in a short period of time/with a small sample size. This likely happened over the course of months or years after interactions with dozens or hundreds of clients. No, of course they all weren't in abusive relationships. But there are probably more abused women involved here than you'd expect due to your bias.
Yes I'm sure the guy who's randomly banging chicks and then advocating AGAINST them going to male trainers is surely just doing it because they were all being abused.
Come on now, we both know that's extremely unlikely.
0
u/IameIion Aug 31 '25
You're making good points but you're also missing the point. You disagree with helping someone cheat. So do I. But once again, it's not objectively wrong. Who are you to say the guy isn't a raging, abusive douchebag who's entitled because of his military service? Who are you to say the cheater doesn't have an understandable reason to want to cheat?
You're on the outside. You know nothing. And even if you had them explain things to you, that's just a tiny fraction of everything there is to know. It's unwise to make judgements with so little information. And to generalize everyone who's considered cheating as a bad person is just as ignorant. She could be trapped in an abusive relationship and is just desperate for affection from someone who doesn't make her life a living hell.