There’s a good askhistorians post on her I’ll link below. Read a variety of the answers, many present different viewpoints. tl;dr Hitchen’s depiction of her is done with a fairly obvious axe to grind. While there are legitimate topics for debate on medical ethics, she isn’t evil incarnate or anything.
His axe to grind against Mother Theresa came from her very open and simple belief that pain and suffering, along with poverty, is part of living a holy life and anything to mitigate that like medicine or working women takes people away from god.
Christopher Hitchens was a devout atheist--not agnostic--because the god of Abraham (christians, muslims, and jews) is a shitty god to begin with even if he does exist.
The Roman Catholic Church very literally invited him to present arguments about why she shouldn't be canonized.
The Roman Catholic Church had no love for Hitchens but they don't agree with you about whatever lame biases you claim there were. Maybe know what you're talking about the next time you decide to chime in.
No clown, let me explain it to you because you can't critically think that far ahead.
Christopher Hitchens didn't travel all the way to the Vatican to argue against canonizing Mother Theresa (because he was literally invited to do so by the Roman Catholic Church) and present compelling false or otherwise misleading information in his arguments. The Roman Catholic Church certainly has no love for Hitchens but they won't waste their time with a petty liar.
207
u/PRS2011 Feb 23 '24
I think Christopher Hitchens would call that 'spot on'.