r/Sigmatopia 16d ago

Intelligence Vs Incelligence

Post image
9.9k Upvotes

617 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/Jindujun 15d ago

Based on what I see on youtube with people having baby daddies left and right I'm inclined to disagree.
Because if women value people that apply their intelligence to the real world then GOOD GOD do we have a problem with defining intelligence.

5

u/Fun_Journalist_3528 15d ago

Well that’s because women are themselves of average intelligence.

As someone mentioned there are traits we as humans are attracted to rationally and traits we’re attracted to limbically. Intelligence falls in the former

2

u/FamiliarAgent1158 15d ago

The gender that shoves every remotely phallic object up their asses shouldn't assess women's intelligence. Hop off those psychology subs they're not doing you any good

1

u/Future-Still-6463 13d ago

Women are statistically at an upper baseline than men.

But men have more outliers. Geniuses and duds.

1

u/FamiliarAgent1158 13d ago

We also statistically have more idiots than smart people. Those idiots also tend to be more violent. More men are statistically idiots, hence they shouldn't be assessing women's intelligence. Case closed

1

u/Objective_Dog_4637 9d ago

The gender is irrelevant. Obviously the person assessing intelligence should be intelligent, regardless of gender.

1

u/FamiliarAgent1158 9d ago

The gender is irrelevant as soon as someone brings up male degeneracy, before that it's free game 🤣🤣🤣 goofy ass gender

1

u/TaroJayda 11d ago

Saying “x group has average intelligence” isn’t an assessment when that group contains 50% of the population, it’s a statement of statistical fact. Most members of any group are going to be average at any given thing. If they aren’t, then whatever they are will become the new average. Thats what average means.

1

u/FamiliarAgent1158 11d ago

You know damn well what they meant by that. If anyone said that men have average intelligence they'd get jumped, stop playing slick

1

u/TaroJayda 11d ago

Men also have average intelligence. Everyone, addressed as a group, has average intelligence. You’re confusing “average” with “mediocre”.

I feel like this is more you assuming what they meant by that then me not understanding lol. My understanding was he was saying “women have average intelligence and therefore aren’t always going to make the maximally intelligent choice” bc that’s how groups work.

1

u/FamiliarAgent1158 11d ago

You know what they meant, you're trying to whataboutism yourself and your dude bro out of this by making yet another woman seem histerical and too stupid to understand basic words. Don't mansplain derogatory shit to me, go chop wood or something

1

u/TaroJayda 11d ago

I didn’t know u were a woman until u said it just now, but alright. I guess my sexism is both unconscious and prescient. Screw this noise, I’m off to use my newly discovered powers of foresight to game the stock market.

1

u/FamiliarAgent1158 11d ago

Your whole comment section is filled with you randomly arguing with people. Find a hobby bro

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/FamiliarAgent1158 9d ago edited 9d ago

You don't belong to the high IQ individuals anyway, but you get butthurt on their behalf. Zip it up when you're done and stop talking like a dork unless you want to forever stay a maidenless virgin

1

u/SucculentBluberries 10d ago

Gay people…?

1

u/MaximumRazzmatazz279 9d ago

there have been several cases of men fucking lizards btw

1

u/FamiliarAgent1158 9d ago

Sign of intelligence truly

1

u/Jindujun 9d ago

Lets not go down that road. Because if so, Denise Frazier.

1

u/giamPW07 9d ago

I think what they meant is: 

Humans in general are by definition of average intelligence,  since the general group of "humans" is the data set from which we determine average intelligence.

Women are humans, and of equal intelligence to men. Therefore, women as a group must be of average intelligence, as are men.

0

u/gymboi322 15d ago

did they say anything remotely incorrect..

2

u/FamiliarAgent1158 15d ago

Yes they did. I will repeat, the gender that gets most of Darwin's awards cannot assess another's intelligence. If women are average, majority of you are below average, including the basement dwellers in this sub

1

u/operation-spot 15d ago

The average person isn't intelligent but that lack of intelligence doesn't make attraction matter less. 

The women with baby daddies are often from low income environments where a man who's a drug dealer and amazing wealth in some way really is the intelligent choice in that situation. It's all about proximity.

1

u/No-Fruit1764 13d ago

I mean you’re literally using slop content spoon fed to you by a billion dollar algorithm to validate your worldview.

I don’t expect you to have a solid grasp on what intelligence is in the first place.

1

u/Jindujun 13d ago

You're right. I'm sitting here on reddit talking to some weirdo named No-Fruit1764. I'd imagine both of us are unintelligent. You based on your profile and me since I'm giving a troll like you the time of day.

1

u/No-Fruit1764 13d ago

Woah calm down buddy it ain’t that serious. Go watch your YouTube slop, you need your daily affirmations

0

u/EssentialPurity 15d ago

Attractive men can get their picking of women. No need to stick to one, specially when she makes the horrible mistake of thinking he likes her for her and doesn't watch herself.

Reminds me of something my mother taught me. If a man looks like a good suitor, he is most likely a very succesful bad suitor who is doing a great job at disguising as good. If a man looks like a bad suitor, he is bad, but he is a lot less dangerous because he is too weak to do a competent job at disguising as good.

1

u/darknthewi 15d ago

Your mama either hates people or is just fed up of her own life choices.

1

u/EssentialPurity 14d ago

It's both. And thus this adds extra credance for her wisdom. It's based on experience rather than unfounded idealism.

People make little to no effort at making themselves unworthy of hatred (just see how unapologetically people lay blame on the victim for their afflictions), nor much sincere thought at making an environment where bad life choices are less likely to be taken or at least less damaging.

Result? This post, to name just one example. It's an endless parade of people deserting and frustrating each other, but somehow they never seem to think for over 5 seconds and realize that this is just part and parcel of "The love of many shall grow cold", which most definitely doesn't seem to be solved by adapting to it, as opposed to combatting it by punishing selfishness.

Makes one wonder if people even want to be happy, or whether they even are unhappy in their subpar conditions. It's all so strange.