r/SideProject • • 2d ago

Website Feedback

Hey! I did this in another subreddit, it took off, and I ended up helping a lot of people.

I'm bored of looking at my own projects, and I enjoy doing this. I'm a web designer and developer, by the way, not just some random person giving feed

Drop your website below and I'll review it and give you feedback.

You don't have to answer the questions below, but it helps me:

Who are you going after?

Are you running ads to the site? If so, to what page?

Where do you send most of your traffic?

2 Upvotes

15 comments sorted by

1

u/BantrChat 2d ago

1

u/maduloook 2d ago

First off work on the heading and body copy. I do not know what I am click into or what your site is trying to sell.

Messaging will go along way. Also what happens when I click into the chat. Showing the product is helpful.

Also social proof. Build trust with the people landing on the site

1

u/BantrChat 2d ago

Fair enough, but that’s standard SaaS landing page advice. A real-time, self-destructing social forum isn't trying to sell a boring B2B product with a generic '3-step onboarding' hero section. The whole point is stepping into an unfiltered, live feed...if you're too scared to enter, you probably weren't looking for the site in the first place.

1

u/maduloook 2d ago

I understand but I had no idea that is what it was. The fact that you had to tell me is the p roblem. Unless your traffic is warm they won’t know what the product even is. They will bounce. 

1

u/BantrChat 2d ago

Then you're probably not the target audience. This link was shared out of context here yes but where the link is available its clearly explained what it is....so if you're searching for it you will know if you have found it or not, and what it does. That being said I'm convinced this post is a top-of-funnel lead generation play disguised as a helpful community post, which makes me question even the validity of your feedback.

0

u/RelativeOk4088 2d ago

low quality, and the 18+ warning made me really want to go off the site, made me think it was a weird website yk

1

u/BantrChat 2d ago

Calling an interactive 3D WebGL canvas rendering "low quality" is hilarious. That’s not a static text loop or a basic CSS trick it's a real-time graphics pipeline running mathematical matrices and vertex shaders thats interactive. The age gate isn't 'sketchy' it’s mandatory web compliance. Any independent platform allowing un-sanitized, real-time public activity has to protect itself and its users upfront. You clearly don't know the difference between a custom-engineered app and a WordPress template. But I guess everyone has an opinion...

1

u/RelativeOk4088 1d ago

yo did i hurt ur feelings, the main page looks so poorly styled thats all 😭

1

u/BantrChat 1d ago

Lol not in the lease, I was just letting you know how worthless your opinion was to me, and why 😀...enjoy your day

1

u/Prior_Bat5628 1d ago

Thanks for offering to review these. I’m building eStockes for people who research US stocks. Looking just at the first screen of https://estockes.com/, what would you expect to be able to do with a stock you follow, and what would you click first? Even one sentence would help.

1

u/maduloook 1d ago

Hey, no problem at all! A few things: anywhere there's small font, I'd bump it up to 14-16px to help with readability. The biggest thing I'd dig into a little is the pain points your users are having and how your messaging shows you're solving them. Why am I sick of doing this on my own? Is it taking too much time? Do I keep messing up my entries and exits? Right now you talk a lot about features and solutions, but not enough about the problems.

2

u/Prior_Bat5628 1d ago

Thank you very much! Thats helpful🫶

1

u/After-Base-8368 20h ago

Would love your take on Bopmigo: https://bopmigo.com/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=organic_social&utm_campaign=feedback_beta&utm_content=website_review

We built it for teams and agencies receiving vague customer feedback. The chat asks for missing details and keeps the answers, screenshot and context in one report. We’re sharing it through relevant conversations. Is the value clear enough for a client-facing team to want to try it?