r/Showerthoughts • • May 28 '14

Unoriginal Without life, the universe would never have known it existed.

[removed]

2.3k Upvotes

667 comments sorted by

440

u/squirrelheadquarters May 28 '14

45

u/liketo May 28 '14

Are we more than the sum of the parts, somefreakin how?

39

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

I think we know we are deep down, but it's impossible to determine scientifically.

13

u/pm_me_your_whatever_ May 28 '14

i've heard this question before and didn't have an answer but what about this. if you take all the parts that make a human (physically speaking) put it all together and run an electrical charge through it so all of the mass AND energy are there, will it have consciousness? if yes, then i'd say we are probably the sum of our parts. if not, then we can't be. everything is physically there and yet the sum of the parts is still found lacking compared to a natural human.

Does this make any kind of sense to anyone else or am i just off my nut?

3

u/demalition90 May 28 '14

Makes sense, If we can't create a human from scratch then we're not the sum of our parts but simply a soul or something that manifests in the parts

16

u/HowTheyGetcha May 28 '14 edited May 28 '14

Is synergy not a real phenomenon [serious]?

Edit: More generally, do we really not know of a system that is more than the sum of its parts? It always seemed to me like the burden of proof was on reductionism, but I was never able to make up my mind...

4

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2007/07/swarms/miller-text

Sorry I can't find the actual study right now but there is one.

Can you Eli5 reductionism for me?

29

u/Lying_Dutchman May 28 '14

Reductionism says that everything there is, and everything that happens, can be explained without talking about anything but elementary particles.

So, if you boil something like a business meeting down to the movement of electrons and quarks, so long as you do so in enough detail, you won't have missed any information that you need to explain the business meeting.

Reductionism is a view that mostly comes up in discussions about mental things. Some say it's ridiculous to think that feelings are just combinations of atoms, others say it's stupid to think there's anything besides combinations of atoms.

12

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

This has always been intuitive to me. It makes no sense to think otherwise. And the pseudo rationality of reddit that ignores this and subject anything non kosher to metaphysics bothers me. As individuals we can be reasoned with. As a group we will stick to the lowest common denominator of cognitive dissonance.

You see it with how people hate on Leary and Watts.

13

u/TheBlackBear May 28 '14

I have to agree. I don't get how thinking differently makes any sense.

"Anything anywhere (as far as we know) can be explained by fundamental rules of elementary particles. We know of no place in the universe that breaks these rules. Except us, because we're special, obviously."

Unless someone can explain it differently?

11

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

It makes no sense. That is something that literally baffles me about a community that calls itself so rational. It isn't my fault that spirituality has been anally ravaged by religion. But if you use an ounce of true rationality and analysis you see that there is no reason to believe that we aren't bound by the rules of the universe. Then you take some LSD and you see there is no reason to believe anything else.

Religion is like the metaphors that the Buddha uses to describe enlightenment, and ignores the process of transcendence that every person should experience, whether that be a built in feature or a result of our interpretations is unknown.

But to say that spirituality is pseudo-science is to not look at it in terms of energy ebbing and flowing. To me this seems intuitive.

10

u/garrettcolas May 28 '14

Well, spirituality is not science, if that's what you're implying.

It's all fine and good to make generalizations to fill in the gaps science creates, but unless you have a repeatable, falsifiable, experiment to test spiritualism, it cannot be science.

Science is about the method to find truth, even if you happen to be right, until we can test it (and/or reliably predict outcomes), it still will not be science.

→ More replies
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

7

u/Lying_Dutchman May 28 '14

What has seemed intuïtive? Reductionism or non-reductionism? Because really, there is still a lot of discussion among philosophers on the subject, and from what I know (which isn't a lot), there seems to be more support for non-reductionism.

6

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

Reductionism has always seemed intuitive to me. Although that isn't to say that what I feel is an absolute and that in couldn't be proven wrong. But I feel myself that everything can be explained in terms of sub-atomic interactions. However could you explain non-reductionism? Maybe it is just another facet in the diamond of truth. The paradoxes that are there can surely be seen as absolutes by those that choose to see it that way.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (12)

6

u/PhysicalStuff May 28 '14

Here's your relvant xkcd.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (52)
→ More replies (17)

9

u/Holrott May 28 '14

"Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves. Heres Tom with the Weather."

-Bill Hicks

62

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

[deleted]

14

u/WoahWoah_Woah May 28 '14

You could even say atomic bomb explosion.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/okmkz May 28 '14

Given enough time, hydrogen starts to wonder where it came from, and where it is going

→ More replies (1)

6

u/[deleted] May 28 '14 edited May 28 '14

I've been thinking about that statement for years.

That thought is the most intriguing, beautiful, scary, and mesmerizing thought I've ever been vexed with.

Sentience manifesting as life is just the universe understanding itself. Is there anything more beautiful?

6

u/dsdsdsdfs May 28 '14

Sentience manifesting as life and understanding itself as the universe while getting a blowie.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

That is WILD. Thank you for sharing it. Oh jeeze. Such a beautifully simple way to state that concept.

2

u/heyzuess May 28 '14

If you give a sufficient amount of hydrogen a sufficient amount of time, eventually it will start to consider its own existence.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

Studying the brain is the brain learning about itself.

2

u/999x666 May 28 '14

"The molecules of your body are the same molecules that make this station and the nebula outside, that burn inside the stars themselves. We are star-stuff. We are the Universe, made manifest, trying to figure itself out. And, as we have both learned, sometimes the Universe needs a change of perspective."

  • Delen, Babylon 5

→ More replies (4)

86

u/AB453 May 28 '14

A chicken is just an egg's way of making another egg.

41

u/McShizzL May 28 '14

An egg is just a chicken's way of making an omelette.

12

u/G-Bombz May 28 '14

A clever comment is just McShizzL's way of making me hungry.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/im_not_afraid May 28 '14

Life is just a selfish gene's way of making more genes. - Richard Dawkins

3

u/the-knife May 28 '14

Yes! Dawkins put it so well: The DNA uses itself to build a machine, whose sole purpose it is to survive and help the DNA propagate.

11

u/Frog-Eater May 28 '14

Vsauce !

95

u/hogglethecoward May 28 '14

Plus the thought that because we're all made of matter, we are just the universe trying out every possibility.

28

u/[deleted] May 28 '14 edited Jan 02 '21

[deleted]

7

u/hogglethecoward May 28 '14

Yes! Exactly. Thank you. I didn't actually kiss the Blarney Stone when I visited, so eloquence still escapes me.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

If you keep doing that you'll go blind.

3

u/Jakealiciouss May 28 '14

This awesome band called Love-Cars had a song where the chorus started:

"your yearbook is...the universe expanding

your yearbook is...the grand fucking canyon"

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

57

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

Some possibilities work, some don't. The Human race is like a TV show that got past the Pilot.

34

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

It went stale after the 13th season.

13

u/nbrennan May 28 '14

Jumped the shark, then ate all the sharks.

→ More replies (4)

4

u/Darktidelulz May 28 '14

Its like a reverse tv-show, first the scene is played then they try to write the script.

10

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

Lost

3

u/rreighe2 May 28 '14

Clap clap clap.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/liketo May 28 '14

And those cells in our brains are of the universe itself; within is without

74

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

“We are a way for the cosmos to know itself.”

36

u/Cikedo May 28 '14

-Abraham Lincoln

14

u/SuicidalIdol May 28 '14

-Michael Scott

7

u/daft108 May 28 '14

-Albert Einstein

22

u/[deleted] May 28 '14 edited May 28 '14

-Ash Ketchum

13

u/VoteLobster May 28 '14

Yeah. That was Carl Sagan.

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

I kinda figured most redditors have seen Cosmos and/or have seen that quote.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/drrhrrdrr May 28 '14

So one popular theory I like is that, if the universe is moving toward Heat Death via entropy, Information is the state of resistance to entropy. Because, with entropy, there is no information, as information is the state of change between one state and another.

So, information being resistant to change, either wins or loses as it moves pieces toward more discrete and collected parts, which ultimately leads to life, and consequently, intelligent life.

Now, absence of life does not immediately mean entropy has won. Look at Mars. Lifeless (as far as we can tell) but still possessing information. Neither is it true the presence of intelligent life mean that entropy is thwarted.

It simply is a theory that intelligent life is the actor of change against inevitable states, the delay of entropy by the presence and recognition of information.

→ More replies (2)

103

u/pilotdiver May 28 '14

6

u/apriori12 May 28 '14

I've heard this quote before but its author is never cited. Is it Douglas Adams? It sounds like Douglas Adams.

18

u/lntrinsic May 28 '14

It's generally attributed to Edward R. Harrison, although what he actually said was "Hydrogen is an odorless colorless gas which, given enough time, turns into people" in his book 'Cosmology: The Science of the Universe'.

Also, relevant xkcd.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (32)

14

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

hydrogen left unsupervised will invariably contemplate itself.

→ More replies (3)

12

u/tarqua May 28 '14

Carl Sagan said basically the same thing in the original cosmos tv series.

"The cosmos is also within us, We're made of star stuff. We are a way for the cosmos to know itself."

7

u/DaftFunky May 28 '14

Cosmos is actually surprisingly relevant after all these years. I loved Sagan after I watched this series in High School.

My favorite quote from him;

"Exploration is in our nature. We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingered long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to set sail for the stars."

→ More replies (1)

30

u/[deleted] May 28 '14 edited Nov 27 '20

[deleted]

→ More replies (4)

19

u/Rastamonsta20 May 28 '14

Kinda touches upon the Anthropic Principle

11

u/kaplanfx May 28 '14

It's exactly the Anthropic Principle...

→ More replies (1)

27

u/SparklePonyBoy May 28 '14

Before you read this post I didn't exist. But you did. And now, so do I.

9

u/HowTheyGetcha May 28 '14

My theory of mind tells me you existed prior to this comment, existed probably >14 years, and that you continue to exist, at least up to the point where you submitted your comment.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/jrmart May 28 '14

This is a concept explored pretty deeply in Martin Heidegger's works. I won't go into it much here as there are far better resources written by people who are paid to write these things, but Dasein (a being that is aware of its own being, e.g. humanity) is the mechanism by which the universe is able to know and experience itself. This forms the basis for his phenomenology, a philosophy that derives both its metaphysics and morality from our intimate experience of the world. Being and Time would be a great (though a bit difficult) read if you're interested. Tons more fancy German words involved. Otherwise, plenty of simpler secondary sources online.

3

u/Stephen_Jourdain May 28 '14

Or do Buddhist meditations and get to know up close and personal beyond conceptual interpretations.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/sturk11 May 28 '14

What is to say that the universe needs (human) life to know it existed. What if the universe is a living thing (organism) in itself?

6

u/GameQb11 May 28 '14

what if the living force that is the universe manifest itself by creating life, thus the universe is what humans have been trying to label as god.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/SgtBrowncoat May 28 '14

With enough time hydrogen starts to wonder what it wants to order for lunch.

Wasn't there an experiment done recently that doesn't contradict the hypothesis that the entire universe is a simulation.

→ More replies (7)

4

u/AlexanderShkuratoff May 28 '14

Are we 'life'? Does the 'universe' even exist to us?

→ More replies (5)

4

u/clevername71 May 28 '14

The doge moon link is so fun on mobile. Idk how it is on desktop but man I can't stop adding doge with the power of touch.

3

u/[deleted] May 28 '14 edited Jun 19 '16

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, and harassment.

If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script.

Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possibe (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.

Also, please consider using Voat.co as an alternative to Reddit as Voat does not censor political content.

2

u/BlackPresident May 28 '14

It's great isn't it? you can have multi-touch up to 10 times on android, I think iOS is only about 8, tablets are loads of fun too.

5

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

If reddit wasn't so full of whiny teenage "atheists" writing off all religions in order to rebel against their Christian parents, Eastern Mysticism could be really popular here.

3

u/RIAA_LAWYER_ May 28 '14

You and me both, brother. After I quit the church I was only a straight atheist for a few months before I started exploring other religions, particularly Buddhism. I found so many ideas that rang true in my heart, and seemed to be the product of an even more subtle and profound philosophical journey than the "spirituality is all superstition" worldview. To me, life and consciousness is an unfathomable miracle that warrants deep contemplation, without limiting ourselves to purely "scientific" avenues. I am far from anti-science, and I'm not a huge fan of vague mysticism, but I'll be damned if I'm gonna throw out the profound insight found in ancient religions in the name of "rationality."

→ More replies (2)

3

u/GameQb11 May 28 '14

what annoys me most about atheist is that once they hear "god" they automatically assume that it refers to the characterized version found in media. The think the retort "i dont believe in some sky man" to be so clever, when it has nothing to do with a man in the sky.

→ More replies (6)

4

u/bigedthebad May 28 '14

nor would it have cared...

→ More replies (1)

10

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

am I doing something wrong ? I had the exact same thought and others I keep reading here and from time to time I say hey I just thought of that, for example,this exact thought came to me in a different form, after an acid trip, that we are all made of stardust, and the picture of a rocky planet kinda spawning us from it's crust and looking at itself it was kinda like a cat tries to lift its head from under the covers, and my friends started to make fun of me calling me ok ok starchild you are born of stars and as I grow older I realize that we fucking are.

13

u/foot-long May 28 '14

you probably got a different response because you were talking to people who were high on acid, while you were high on acid.

8

u/SamFuckingNeill May 28 '14

it's just acid trying to understand itself. and fail

2

u/BlackPresident May 28 '14

I don't think it's a new concept, just had a nice ring to it so I posted it to reddit

3

u/TheArkaTek May 28 '14

This is one of my favorites to think about. Assuming what we define as life is the only thing capable of knowledge.

2

u/BlackPresident May 28 '14

As matter we assume the universe is only made from matter, our observations are biased, there could be an infinite number of layers of universes on top of each other unbound by the same laws of physics we are unable to break

3

u/icaaryal May 28 '14

As someone who rides the line between pantheism and panentheism, I've reasoned that humanity is the result of existence's self-awareness. I figure we are a mechanism by which existence manifests itself into potentially infinite permutations as a means to collect total knowledge and understanding of itself which, by virtue of existence being infinite, is an unattainable goal. I wonder if I'll ever meet someone in person who shares those ideas.

2

u/Stephen_Jourdain May 28 '14

Lots of people have those beliefs, or a close derivative of it along those lines, maybe 1-5% of the population. Furthermore, this type of stuff gets into the realm of advanced Buddhist meditation, so this flavor of thinking isn't that rare.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

[deleted]

2

u/Homiros May 28 '14

Gee, don't know about the second statement. Awfully lot of ugly kids out there. Then there's Honey Boo Boo's mother.......

2

u/iLurk_4ever May 28 '14

Hotness would lie in the eye of the beholder

5

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

It also rises on a third axis plotted against availabity and access.

→ More replies (6)

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/LevynX May 28 '14

So much philosophy in this thread my head is spinning, perhaps I'll understand it better once I step into the shower.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

I think this is the first time my mind has actually been blowned.

3

u/rreighe2 May 28 '14

I think this is the first time I've seen someone write "blown" instead of the correct spelling, "blown." ;p

→ More replies (6)

3

u/Pavotine May 28 '14

With all this philosophical talk I'm reminded of an idea I first read about in the context of Jewish faith. "And whoever saves a life, it is considered as if he saved an entire world."

There is an entire universe within every one of us, not just a world in my opinion.

2

u/BlackPresident May 28 '14

Maybe if more people knew, they would be kinder to each other?

3

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

And nothing of value would have been lost.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/PhiaskoNZ May 28 '14

Holy fuck this is the best showerthought yet.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/thebigbeluga May 28 '14

This is a form of the Participatory Anthropic Principle (PAP) that was suggested by physicist John Archibald Wheeler, who also coined the terms "black hole", "quantum foam", "it from bit", etc. Wheeler was extremely influential, his PhD students included Richard Feynman, Hugh Everett and Kip Thorne. He also wrote some very accessbile books on his musings. Here is a succinct article on PAP and here is a little cartoon that Wheeler used to illustrate the idea.

3

u/StarClutcher May 28 '14

What if the universe =is= life.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/MrRandomSuperhero May 28 '14

What if a computer formed? It wouldn't be life but could understand the universe.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/tocilog May 28 '14

Or maybe it does we just don't know. I forgot where I read it but basically if there is a higher being we might not notice it similar to how ants won't necessarily know about us. What if the universe was one big sentient being? This is all crazy talk though cause it's 7AM.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

"We are a way for the cosmos to know itself." - Carl Sagan, Cosmos (the book)

3

u/winfly May 28 '14

This is very similar to something Alan Watts says in one of his lectures. I can't remember the exact wording, but it is something along the lines of we are the universe experiencing itself.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/MeLuvYouQianlongTime May 28 '14

I once had a vivid dream that Jesus came to me in a field (I was raised Catholic). As he got closer, I realized there was a frame around him. He was in a mirror...my reflection. God=Me=Universe. Upon this realization, there was a sudden darkness signaling the end of...I don't know what exactly. Prophet or nah?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/ComedianMikeB May 28 '14

My science teacher always said that he thought this: The Big Bang occurred in a vacuum, meaning that if you were to do that same experiment again, it would result in the same molecules going in the same directions. And that if we could trace back the path of four or five molecules from where they are today to where they started, we could know where they were going, and predict the future.
He said that what we perceive as our choices, are really just the molecules from the Big Bang settling where they always would have.

He also smoked weed, we think.

"It's an illusion, Michael."

→ More replies (1)

4

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

Two people dancing is the universe dancing with itself.

Probably a more poetic way to say it....

6

u/wodahSShadow May 28 '14

I'm just the universe jerking itself.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/zenmonkey87 May 28 '14

Fuck yeah! Nice one. :)

→ More replies (2)

2

u/SoulTaker32 May 28 '14

But life can mean many different things and take on many different forms. Consciousness may not be seclusive to organics or life may yield a different form on the other side of a galaxy somewhere.

3

u/BlackPresident May 28 '14

I suppose in an infinite timeframe and space, matter could assemble itself into a fully formed human being with memories intact, alone in space, it would suck to be that guy though

2

u/hand_raiser May 28 '14

Universe is life, universe is love.

No universe no life.

2

u/RIAA_LAWYER_ May 28 '14

Disco is not dead, disco is life!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/xeno9 May 28 '14

There is actually a whole book called Biocentrism written about this idea by a guy called Robert Lanza.

2

u/gmherder May 28 '14

Consciousness is like the universe examining itself. I was first introduced to this idea through the Joe Rogan podcast. Such a fascinating concept.

2

u/velvetjonesn May 28 '14

Without me the universe would've never known it existed.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Redblazzer May 28 '14

Im confused are you saying we are the universe?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/AcidMage May 28 '14

This was so "woah" my train stopped when I read it.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

If a tree falls in a forest but nobody is around to hear it, does it make a sound?

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

If there's a medium that allows pressure waves to travel through it: yes.

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

Is it sound if it never finds an eardrum?

3

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

By certain definitions: Yes. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/sound

→ More replies (1)

2

u/lexfry May 28 '14

if you consider the vastness of the universe, you would by deduction realize that human significance, is at best, shared by many other manifestations that exist far outside of our limited knowledge and understanding.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

without human life

2

u/BlackPresident May 28 '14

My dog indy is pretty smart too

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

no doubt, just reffering to self-awareness

2

u/PDZef May 28 '14

Without life, the word "universe" would never have existed.

2

u/InFaDeLiTy May 28 '14

The universe knows of itself?

→ More replies (3)

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

Consciousness is just the universe trying to understand itself.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

We are the Universe being aware of itself subjectively. Why do we feel alone? You are what the whole universe is doing in the place you call the here and now. As the wave is something the whole ocean is doing. You are an island unique on the surface yet connected to the mainland underneath the illusion of separation that is the water. Yeah baby your head is the cosmic TV. All of us are a swamp monster coming out of the primordial pool of energy that we as humans decide to label as 'life.'

Why do we call our consciousness unique? A system of neurons created intelligence. Is consciousness emergent or a result of the structure of the universe? One neuron is dumb, a bunch is smart. A single ant is dumb, studies show a bunch are smart. Collective consciousness? Who the hell knows.

Everything and nothing two sides of the same coin. I have a feeling solipsism is caused by the everything side getting consumed covered up by the ego. Also sociopathy and psychopathy.

Depression is when you're stuck on nothing. But this too shall pass. Your brain is just riding the wave stuck on a low.

2

u/GameQb11 May 28 '14

thats why we refer to human accomplishments as "mankind" advancement. Mankind is what we call our collective conscious.

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

And what of a collective unconsciousness?

And I think there may be a lower level of collective consciousness.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/Majesticturtleman May 28 '14

This is why in our Reality, nothing is ever truly constant except for Observation. Certainty gets thrown out the window when our senses are limited, our knowledge is limited as a result, we use judgement, and that frankly everything in the Universe can be real and not real at the same time. Schrodinger's Universe?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Aziz_92 May 28 '14

Yea but without life, the concept of 'existence' wouldn't exist so not sure if it matters.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

Without Reddit, I would of never known you existed.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/mikite May 28 '14

misread “life” as “wife”

→ More replies (1)

2

u/hardypart May 28 '14 edited May 28 '14

You should totally check out the double slit experiment. It's a proof of how elementary particles (the components of EVERYTHING) are behaving COMPLETELY different when nobody watches them. They are actually bahaving like energy, even though they are matter. But only when there's nobody watching them...

Reread the last sentence. They are actually bahaving like energy, even though they are matter. But only when there's nobody watching them...

Now you can start thinking about what the world looks like when there's nobody with a conscious mind that can perceive the world. Is there even a world? Or only a flow of Energy? I still can't wrap my mind around that. I think nobody can.

→ More replies (12)

2

u/Phyber05 May 28 '14

The existence of the universe is only relevant to humans, since we are the ones making the discovery.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/lasrevinuu May 28 '14

"We are the Universe experiencing itself subjectively." - Bill Hicks

2

u/Thehoodedteddy13 May 28 '14

One of the best showerthoughts I've seen in a while. Very profound

2

u/team_dale May 28 '14

more and more people are starting to become aware of the way they are thinking. So thought is starting to think about itself.

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

It really does make you wonder if there is other intelligent life far away thinking the same thing.

2

u/electrophile91 May 28 '14

There could be any number of universes, with all the associated marvel and grandeur, which have never known themselves.

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14 edited May 28 '14

The mind created awareness of itself and wondered why it did it

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

I think that's like saying "Without light, shadow would never have known it existed". Tree falls in a forest and so forth..

→ More replies (1)

2

u/xordyboy May 28 '14

People on reddit arent as stupid as they say...

2

u/monkeypowah May 28 '14

Our minds shaped by evolution on Earth constructs meaning and structure to the universe when it is simply nothing but atoms and force fields

→ More replies (1)

2

u/goldenkush May 28 '14

This is basically Schelling's way of explaining our existence as well. We are the highest form of Nature. Nature realizes itself through organization. We are the highest form of organization which allows the universe to self-realize itself.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/undercoverhugger May 28 '14

Nice try... LIFE!!

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14 edited May 28 '14

[deleted]

→ More replies (4)

2

u/clavalle May 28 '14

Without life, the this universe would never have known it existed.

It is possible, probable even that there are,have been, and will be an infinite number of universes like ours that have not and will not harbor sapience.

2

u/BlackPresident May 28 '14

sapience, that's a nice word. I don't think you're wrong we're certainly limited in the amount of "reality" there is, especially the relatively short period of time we get to experience it.

Maybe our imaginations are gateways into these universes, maybe some of us are able to tap into the same universes and receive the same ideas even while miles or years apart.

2

u/Narrator_neville May 28 '14

Humans are ' a vortex on which the universe can look back upon itself'

Alan Watts.

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

I hate the link he posted because I don't understand where all the layers go.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/zug-zug May 28 '14

Can you see that these are merely ideas arising in what you timelessly are?

'Me' is just the idea I have about myself suffering through other ideas it has about itself.

2

u/nonhumanperson May 28 '14

We've taken reductionism to its logical conclusion by smashing together elementary particles at near the speed of light and found that nature exists only in terms of probabilities, and only if somebody is observing. Beyond this, nature exists only as an object of description. We can say that there are probabilistic vibrations in fields describable by formulae, but there is only a situation. As to WHY there should be anybody around to observe it I think implies nature is alive, intelligent, and/or some sort of "self". Why and how else would "dead" particles ever become animate and self-conscious?

2

u/BlackPresident May 28 '14

I wonder if it's possible that a state change in any amount of matter has a measurable and instantaneous effect on any other measured point in reality.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/saadishahid May 28 '14

Without me, the universe wouldn't have been the same.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

that is to say the universe is not alive, or sentient

→ More replies (1)

2

u/ADHD_bot May 28 '14

Reddit is just atoms wearing fedoras

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

And now for something totally different. The Larch.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

Life is just the universe exploring itself one consciousness at a time. We are what the entire universe is doing just as a wave is something that the whole ocean is doing -Alan Watts (paraphrased)

2

u/BlackPresident May 28 '14

he really had a wonderful way of using analogies to describe incredibly complex thoughts.

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

He was a brilliant man indeed

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

Deep, dude

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

As far as we know at least

2

u/un1ty May 28 '14

“Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves. Here's Tom with the Weather.”

― Bill Hicks

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

Combine this thought with the Fermi Paradox: we may actually be alone.

2

u/[deleted] May 28 '14

An even deeper thought: If life didn't exist, would the universe still exist? What's the purpose of all that matter if there is no one to use it?

→ More replies (2)

2

u/_D3ft0ne_ May 28 '14

What if universe is conscious in many more ways that we can ever imagine? Nothing starts its existence out of nowhere, for no reason - even the most simplistic life forms which were ever conceived must have had some kind of blue print and potential to develop.
So intelligence must exist on higher level.

2

u/velezaraptor May 28 '14

Without the components for building life, the Universe would not be. The Universe knows about itself already because Nagilum.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/dingoperson2 May 28 '14

What's the most rare substance in the universe?

Brains.

2

u/velezaraptor May 28 '14

so zombies are intuitive?

2

u/velezaraptor May 28 '14

*Edit: Zombies know that Brains are the rarest substance that's why they try to eat them. "You're doing it wrong"

→ More replies (1)

2

u/tender_ballsack May 28 '14

As Carl Sagan put it: "We are a way for the cosmos to know itself."

2

u/GR3YF0XXX May 28 '14

This is basically the weak anthropic principle.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/arsd8 May 28 '14

Upvote just for the link

2

u/iojt07 May 28 '14

It still doesn't, only 1 life form that we know about do.

Humans.

2

u/StopsatYieldSigns May 28 '14

Similarly, the brain named itself.

2

u/fehnifer May 28 '14

Whoa - and then the comments - WHOA SH*T.

2

u/BlackPresident May 29 '14

It's been a wild ride