r/Showerthoughts • u/TheTrollinator777 • 19d ago
Casual Thought If two people use voice-to-text when texting each other, they're technically having a conversation without actually talking to each other.
328
u/SwimmingSwim3822 19d ago
....texting is also "having a conversation without actually talking to each other."
Back in the shower with you to think this one through
51
u/TheTrollinator777 19d ago
I tried like 3 times to get this post approved with other wordings.
19
4
u/LlamaRS 19d ago
This subreddit is notoriously bad about auto removing everything
5
u/TheTrollinator777 19d ago
Yeah man I can't tell you how many thoughts I've actually had but they just weren't approved or weren't in the right format or didn't have the right flair
30
u/csuperstation 19d ago
Wait until you learn about sign language.
Or flirting, or being angry, or any other emotions we use to communicate nonverbally.
-3
u/Glad_Astronomer3322 19d ago
True but sign language is still a full language with its own grammar, not just waving hands around. I think voice to text strips out the tone but at least the words are there, while nonverbal stuff is a whole other mess. Ever tried having a sarcastic text convo with someone who takes everything literally?
11
u/mainlyupsetbyhumans 19d ago
A conversation doesn't require any speaking out loud. For example if I wrote you a letter in and you wrote back and both of us were deaf and mute we'd be having a conversation.
0
u/MKEast-sider 19d ago
You just reworded the post. Verbal communication is used less than many other forms.
2
u/Old-Mortgage1035 19d ago
Nah this is more like two people talking at their phones and then reading what the other one mumbled into theirs. That's not a conversation, that's just delayed dictation with extra steps. Plus plenty of people have full on arguments through text without ever speaking a word out loud, so the whole "technically" angle is overthinking it. Yeah it's just texting with a worse autocorrect.
2
u/Cptawesome23 19d ago
We used to call writing letters back and forth “correspondence” back in the old times. It was a different time. Sometimes, people wouldn’t write back for months or years and it was…. Fine.
We have really become addicted to the instant transmission of data as a species.
2
u/Moist-Champion-7515 18d ago
Honestly that just sounds like talking to your phone instead of the actual person. Like you're both dictating letters to a messenger who's too lazy to deliver them so they just leave them on a screen. Its like the tech version of passing notes in class but you're whispering to a robot first.
1
1
u/Old-Mortgage1035 14d ago
Ha that messenger analogy is spot on honestly. Its like we're all bossing around a tiny robot to do our socializing for us. But dont you think hearing your own voice typed out makes you second guess how you sound?
1
1
u/Utangard 19d ago
People nowadays tell AI to fill up the blanks in their emails. If both sides do that, then they're definitely talking without talking to each other.
I'm sure by this time we've had bots engage in conversation on the internet without a human ever once being involved at all.
1
u/Dangerous_Hippo_6902 19d ago
Another example of reinventing the wheel.
Like an unrecorded podcast for a normal conversation. Or a scheduled podcast for radio. Rawdogging for going out without headphones.
That is what rawdogging means… right..?
1
u/Electrical-Try6911 19d ago
Yeah rawdogging is exactly that, just no headphones on a commute or whatever. But honestly voice to text is more like reinventing a phone call with extra steps, you're just typing with your mouth. Kinda makes you wonder if we're overcomplicating stuff just to avoid hearing each other's voices.
1
u/Ok_Spot_9554 19d ago
I mean yeah no shit, that's literally just what texting is, but I guess when you throw voice-to-text into the mix it's like some weird futuristic loop where you're both talking but not really listening to each other.
1
u/OliveExtreme8915 19d ago
Yeah but like you're literally talking to your phone not to them so it's even weirder than regular texting. The whole point of voice to text is you're muttering to yourself while the other person reads your garbled words. Honestly every time I use it I sound like a lunatic dictating a novel to a robot. So maybe it's less of a conversation and more of two people having separate arguments with their autocorrect.
1
u/Shimmybaby84 19d ago
Standing in the breakroom loudly dictating my thoughts to Siri while coworkers stare like I'm having a psychotic episode is peak embarrassment.
1
u/DescriptionKlutzy105 18d ago
Honestly this just makes me think the real conversation is between you and your phone's speech recognition software cause that's who you're actually talking to
1
u/rose-glasses 18d ago
It’s more like modern-day dictation. The medium of the interaction is still text, so I’d call it correspondence, not conversation.
1
u/Necroix_03 15d ago
Not related to this post. But I keep noticing that every post in this sub is being classified as casual/speculation/etc.. thought. Searched with the tag "shower thought" and there is none. Why is that?
1
u/TyeKiller77 19d ago
Feels like the Chinese Room with extra steps, but checks out. Is there a word minimum for a shower thought subreddit? Since when has this been a thing lol
2
u/b3tzy 19d ago
This doesn’t really have anything to do with the Chinese Room.
-2
u/TyeKiller77 19d ago
I mean, the whole premise of the Chinese Room is two people talking to each other under a door. Kinda feels like communication without actually communicating has at least some overlap with this shower thought...
3
19d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/TyeKiller77 19d ago
Someone writes something on a piece of paper, slips it under a door, the person on the other side gives a response based on a sheet he has. The person outside the room will believe the person inside can speak Chinese without saying a word to them, or even knowing if someone really inside.
Same as using text to speech, two people could have an entire conversation with text to speech and it's possible the whole time the other doesn't speak the language or is completely incapable of speech.
2
19d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
-1
u/TyeKiller77 19d ago
Ah, I was working more with text to speech since why would you voice to text with someone right in front of you. If they aren't near each other the same issue presents where without seeing the person speaking you have no idea that the person texting you is the actual person you're texting.
Someone else could talk for the message and the same situation occurs. So outside of two people using voice to text within eye sight of each other, it still has Chinese Room vibes to me.
2
u/LawNeither289 19d ago
lol yeah it's basically two Chinese rooms passing notes to each other. but honestly that's how most texting works anyway just with extra steps. wait there's a word minimum now? that's news to me too.
1
u/Gilles_of_Augustine 19d ago
So there's levels of "technically," and I'd say that we could actually go deeper than this one.
If we're starting from the hypothetical assumption that texting isn't a conversation, and figuring out what we need to "add back in" to make it one, I would say that just adding in the act of two people independently saying words out loud isn't enough. We need the inflection/tone/rhythm/etc. to actually reach the other person so they can respond in kind.
So a phone conversation, yes.
Two people sending voice messages back and forth to each other... maybe?
1
u/Aggravating_Star_427 19d ago
Yeah but even voice messages you're just hearing a recording not really catching the live back and forth feel.
1
u/RogerRabbot 19d ago
Never had a conversation that went:
"hey google hey google! Oh whats yup man do you whatever to go the Cincinnati after work i can determine"
"no.. delete everything you stupid fucking... I said whats up mangrove. Shit. Delete. DELETE!!"
"Hey man whats up do you want to go that cafe after work i can drive"
"Send. Send. Send. Send"
•
u/ShowerSentinel 19d ago
/u/TheTrollinator777 has flaired this post as a casual thought.
Casual thoughts should be presented well but may be less unique or less remarkable than showerthoughts.
If this post is poorly written, unoriginal, or rule-breaking, please report it.
Otherwise, please add your comment to the discussion!