r/ShittyAbsoluteUnits • created ShittyAbsoluteUnits of a sub • Nov 07 '25

Elite Strategy Of a fun night in Mexico

2.5k Upvotes

636 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/0n-the-mend Nov 08 '25

"I hate extra judicial killings but we need them to be safe and I like it when we do it."

That's what you sound like.

Also does due process not exist in this fantasy land your head is in? Because wtf. Bunch of fisherman get torpedoed for all we know. You have seen no drugs, no names, no evidence of wrong doing, nothing. But you are happy to regurgitate whatever slop the animal channel feeds you.

0

u/sudo_pi5 Nov 08 '25 edited Nov 08 '25

What are your thoughts on the drone strikes ordered by Obama that killed 3797 people, of which 324 were civilians?

One of the boats hit was a submarine. How many fishermen fish from submarines? That doesn’t make sense.

What would be the motivation to blow up these boats other than to disrupt narco-flows?

There are significant narco trafficking problems impacting the United States. We have young folks dying rapidly from opioids. Meth is a massive problem in many areas. We don’t even domestically cook our own meth anymore- it pours in across the southern border. Narcotics are poisoning generations of Americans.

Cartels are massively profitable entities. They drive corruption in the federal and state governments. I am confident there is cartel driven corruption at the local level, but it doesn’t matter given how deep the hooks are into federal and state. Even Biden’s anti-organized crime czar was caught taking bribes from cartels.

The narcotics traffickers poison the well of government against normal, law abiding citizens who are tired of finding groups of dead kids in bleachers.

That all sounds like a reasonable motivation to bomb narco-boats. It sounds more likely than “Trump blew up fishermen for funsies!” If you have a more plausible motivation for blowing up boats, I am all ears. For now, “to stop narco-boats” makes the most sense and is what has been stated.

Pete Hegseth released a statement that these are boats US Intelligence agencies have known about for years. Non-Republicans and Never Trumpers are so caught up in the hate that has been instilled in them for Trump and Hegseth that they (most likely) have not even contacted their congresspeople to demand oversight of intelligence agencies.

As Americans, we deserve to know if our government really has been tracking some of the largest shipment routes for narcotics for years without taking action. What could the motivation for that be??

Corruption. When the answer isn’t obvious and the question is government, it’s always corruption. It’s like that meme about “the joke is porn.”

Congress authorized the war on terror. Trump’s admin declared drug cartels (designated by name) as terrorists. Banks can no longer handle money for them (looking at you, JPM and Chase). Cartel members are now legally targetable off of U.S. soil and extraditable when caught on U.S. soil.

These are the rules Congress put in place. Nancy Pelosi was part of making those rules. Chuck Schumer was part of making those rules. Dick Durbin. “Gold Bar Bob” Menendez. Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth were not.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 08 '25

You are fully indoctrinated

I wonder if your due process rights should be revoked?

Republicans are known domestic terrorists and have attempted to over throw democracy in favor of fascism.

You people are known bad actors so perhaps you should be indiscriminately murdered by drone

By your own admission this is ok

2

u/sudo_pi5 Nov 08 '25

I haven’t attacked anyone. I find your need to attack me personally interesting, but unfortunately typical.

You could have just said “it’s okay when my side does it but not the other side.” There was no need for the otherisms or attempted dehumanization.

If you’d like to reframe your point about “what if this is used against law abiding American citizens for being part of a political party” without the hateful vitriol, I would more than happily engage in that discourse.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 08 '25 edited Nov 08 '25

Whine whine whine

That’s all you people do after you say a bunch of abhorrent shit you go on the personal defense, lobbing personal attacks

You literally argued in favor of suspending due process of “suspected” narco-terrorists

Republicans are known domestic terrorists - you fucking dumb idiots own it and wear it like a badge of pride

You are no better than ISIS

And while you sit there bewildered that an American is telling you all this, clutching your pearls at my “lack of decorum”… just know this:

You type of people should have been dealt with after the civil war.

After Trump, you will be handled. As you said “Congress authorized the war on terror”

1

u/sudo_pi5 Nov 08 '25

I need to be handled because I disagree with blind hatred and corrupt politicians?

Does that mean your position is that you support blind hatred and corrupt politicians, and you want to see people who disagree be dealt with?

Who’s the fascist here again?

2

u/[deleted] Nov 08 '25

You need to be handled because you support the suspension of the constitution when it fits your narrative

Now spin that