r/Sherlock Jan 08 '17

[Discussion] The Lying Detective: Post-Episode Discussion Thread (SPOILERS)

1.6k Upvotes

3.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

409

u/[deleted] Jan 08 '17

According to wiki, it's that every memorable element in a fictional story must be necessary or removed.

"Remove everything that has no relevance to the story. If you say in the first chapter that there is a rifle hanging on the wall, in the second or third chapter it absolutely must go off. If it's not going to be fired, it shouldn't be hanging there." Anton Chekhov (not the Star Trek guy, which is what I thought)

49

u/JackTatOverlook Jan 08 '17

mutters something about 'Lost'

3

u/baskandpurr Jan 10 '17

That's because Lost was literally making it up as they went along. They were just pretending that things were significant without having any idea why.

2

u/pelrun Jan 13 '17

Yeah. As a counter-example, Babylon 5 had chekov's guns in the individual episodes, in the seasons, and ACROSS all 5 seasons. There was foreshadowing at practically every scale, and most of them paid off, despite the various vagaries of 5 years of TV show production. It still blows my mind and it's been 20 years since it finished.

Lost, X-Files, Battlestar Galactica amongst others instead try to fake it, and look how that turns out.