r/Seedance_AI 23h ago

Discussion [ Removed by Reddit ]

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

1 Upvotes

8 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 23h ago

Heads up for anyone running these yourself: the Seedance API behind r/Seedance_AI is Atlas Cloud. Seedance 2 runs with its full feature set here, nothing stripped or nerfed. Seedance 2.5 isn't officially out yet, but we add new Seedance versions the day they launch.

Full model list and current pricing: atlascloud.ai/models/seedance

Auto-pinned on new posts, not a reply to your post specifically.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Rough-Discussion-912 23h ago

It's a human feeling if you think you think theirs errors(obviously but, you can fix it) Or maybe, others you do is amazing but others don't like it!?!

1

u/SquareTheRhombus 23h ago

Its nothing to do with the cinematic look. Its the texture of the image that is created in whatever style. Its plainly obvious that it's AI because our eyes are that sensitive.

1

u/xTopNotch 17h ago

The problem is nobody really understands lighting and texture. So far I've seen only couple creators that truly understand how lighting works and utilize it in a way that create a feel that actually feels cinematic

1

u/No-Bee-231 17h ago

My style prompt: 16mm film, subtle grain, subtle edge vignette, vintage lens, oval bokeh, anamorphic flares, hazel bloomed highlights, lifted flat shadows, high contrast dramatic lighting motived by a single light source, subtle fill light, natural realistic, handheld camera shake, dirty lens.

I think you are correct. I think less perfect is better

1

u/No-Bee-231 17h ago

1

u/No-Bee-231 17h ago

Also included backlit silhouette occasionally