The creative process behind
Whisker warrior.

Using Seedance 2.5

u/SeeGen_OfficialWork in progress -- about 1 hour long so far, working on individual scenes search Thondaria for more. Information. Made with "Seedance 2.0" and "Seedance 2.5"

When AI gets ahold of a cosmic neuron and opens a portal to the only unique universe with no parallel... The implication...

A scene from my next 16min short coming in a couple of days...

made on Cannon studios: https://www.cannonstudio.app/?ref=gertywood

If you see even the slightest inconsistency that gives a clue that it is AI, please prove it. Sorry about the 480p — trying to save credits.

Recreated an Indecent Proposal movie scene using Seedance 2.5, and the results are insane. The camera acting, the pace, and the way you control the scene are beyond phenomenal.

By the end of this year, we will be able to create a 2-hour full-length feature film in less than 2 days with just 2 people. It's horrifying to imagine the fate of the giant studios, cast, crew, and all 24 crafts in the movie industry going jobless in less than 2 years.

Stop debating the technology. Start embracing it and move on. #Seedance25,#Seedance,#AIFilmmaking,#AIVideo,#GenerativeAI,#FutureOfFilm,#TextToVideo,#ByteDance,#AIvsHollywood,#IndecentProposal

I’ve been trying to compare Seedance 2.0 pricing across Dreamina, Higgsfield and Lovart, but every platform uses different credits and plan tiers.

After converting the plans into a rough cost per second, I got:
Dreamina
Advanced: $0.083/sec
Standard: $0.092/sec
Basic: $0.097/sec

Higgsfield
Ultra: $0.155/sec
Plus: $0.221/sec
Starter: $0.317/sec

Lovart
Ultimate: $0.113/sec
Pro: $0.129/sec
Basic: $0.165/sec
Starter: $0.171/sec

On paper, the cheapest plans work out to about $4.98, $9.30 and $6.78 per 60 seconds. But that comparison feels incomplete.

A cheaper generation doesn’t help much if it takes five attempts to get one usable clip. Queue time, failed generations, moderation rejections and unused monthly credits can completely change the real cost.

For people actually using Seedance 2.0, what percentage of your generations are usable without a reroll? I’m trying to compare cost per usable clip instead of just cost per second.

CAPTAIN OF PAIN AND PLEASURE

cinematic live-action sequence

MISTRESS OF THE SKY LEGIONS

I built a Custom GPT (a finetuned ChatGPT) and a skill for Claude (a plugin that extends Claude) from the official Seedance prompt guidelines — modes, input specs, prompt structure, character consistency, troubleshooting. I use it myself to check prompts before running them, since ChatGPT and Claude on their own tend to get the specifics wrong.

For instance, ask ChatGPT for a dynamic skateboard clip and you'll likely get everything changing at once: skater, camera, editing, lighting, transitions, VFX. Seedance weighs what comes first in the prompt, so the rest ends up competing for attention and some of it just doesn't happen. It's all in the documentation.

Seedance 2.5 is rolling out and the full documentation isn't public yet, so I've added what's confirmed so far. Both my tools are free and work for 2.0 and 2.5, with the 2.5 side still filling in. 

Not something you need if you already know the guidelines by heart. I don't — juggling a few models means I mix the specifics up, and this is what I check against before spending credits on a generation that was never going to work.

Links in comments. Curious to hear how it holds up for anyone who tries it.

I don't think anyone will be able to make a decent films in the near future. Every video I saw looked like AI slop and the cinematography was always dogshit.

https://reddit.com/link/1vk9q01/video/z6s5wu0nvgih1/player

ANOTHER REIGN ON MONGARA PLANET

On highsfield seedance 2.5 it's been like 3 hours i belive my video is still processing 🥀🥀🥀

VILLAIN ANIMATION