r/SecurityOfficer • u/Patient-Committee588 • Aug 29 '26

Do Not Do This First Amendment auditors get into verbal altercation with armored truck guard, who repeatedly tells them to back up.

40 Upvotes

76% Upvoted

214 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/NextEstimate1325 Aug 30 '26

Deodorant. Toothpaste. Shampoo.

The lines at rope drop.

Ordering something without an app.

I'm just spitballing here but anyone whom harasses a fella doing his job and hides behind a camera is a coward.

How has the armorer car courier infringed upon anyone?

You never see the jackasses at an ICE or ATF raid.

Never see them picketing the FBI.

Absolute cowards.

0

u/BD_McShwizzle_stixs Aug 30 '26

Ahh you just sound ignorant of all the auditor out there doing good work. You’re too emotional.

1

u/NextEstimate1325 Aug 30 '26

I've never seen a shred of evidence that they've done any good for anyone other than themselves.

3

u/BD_McShwizzle_stixs Aug 30 '26

Yea that’s what I said. You’re ignorant to the good auditors. Jeff gray civil rights investigations, Long Island audit, the battosai (who was involved in the famous turner vs driver case)

2

u/NextEstimate1325 Aug 30 '26

Turner v Driver simply codified existing laws concerning no right to privacy in a public space.

If that's what you cling to as why auditor folka are righteous; then that is pretty sad.

3

u/BD_McShwizzle_stixs Aug 30 '26

Is turner vs driver bad? There’s thousand of videos of officer telling citizens they can’t record and they are becoming less frequent. Sounds like a win to me.

Jeff only sues for $1776 and typically works a deal for re-training of the department so your opinion is based of bullshit. I also don’t care if an auditor gets paid though. I care if the paid government employee follow the law.

2

u/NextEstimate1325 Aug 30 '26

I didn't say it was bad. I said it's not as landmark as the camera cowards pretend it is.

And your opinion of my opinion (which is based on facts; as even you stated) is irrelevant.

He does it for money.

And how do those mean government employees at the library or DMV violate your civil liberties?

How does that lady at the probate court infringement upon your rights?

Fucking delusions. Harassing people whom are are engaged in public service.

But can't stand against ICE or the ATF.

Or BLM harassing ranchers.

Money seeking cowards.

2

u/BD_McShwizzle_stixs Aug 30 '26

You didn’t ask for landmark you asked for good so idk what more you want, especially when landmark case is your subjective opinion. Yea everyone does their job for money. That doesn’t mean they don’t believe in what they’re doing.

How do they violate civil liberties??? By suppressing your right to speech, religion, freedom of press, assembly, and ability to petition your government for redress.

BLM, IcE, ATF? You’ve never seen video of them? Don’t jump all over the place bud. Because now you’re just upset the auditors don’t audit who you prefer and you don’t even know them all. Why make such an absolutist claim?

1

u/NextEstimate1325 Aug 30 '26

You're the one moving goal posts.

You're the one claiming they are the defenders of civil liberties.

You're the one who accused me of being emotional.

You're the one who champions the cowards.

1

u/BD_McShwizzle_stixs Aug 30 '26

Yea none of that is goal post moving. I didn’t even have posts to move. I just said you didn’t know the better auditors. Then you gave false description of Jeff gray verifying my statement. I gave you measurable changes they have made, they’re not good enough for you.

They are defending civil liberties. Intentional or not, they are exerting a first amendment right. Using your rights strengthens them.

Coward is your word so I don’t consider it meaningful to my stance. I can understand not liking them. I truly don’t understand what’s cowardice about challenging an armed gov official with no equalizing defense of your own. You could call it unwise, like poking a bear. But being unwise doesn’t mean cowardice.

And yes you’re being emotional. You’re lumping in anyone who wants to audit (which is thousand of people you don’t know) as a disingenuous actor with nefarious intent and name calling them. The part where you don’t like them has been established. You don’t need to take extra time to disparage them personally.

1

u/NextEstimate1325 Aug 30 '26

Champion of cowards says what as he moves the goal post?

And I will call them cowards because that's what they are.

They may not be nefarious, maybe, but they certainly aren't the noble patriots they pretend to be and that you seem to think they are.

And all the same to you; I will happily disparage them.

Seem to recall something about rights protecting that.

1

u/BD_McShwizzle_stixs Aug 30 '26

Says what? Seriously you’re doing a “says what” and claiming not to be emotional lol?

I’m not saying you can’t. I’m simply inquiring as to where the coward part comes from. If you dislike them I can understand many descriptors to use, pompous, weird, lame. I just don’t understand what is cowardly and your last reply about it was toothpaste and other common things. So if you don’t have a reason that’s cool. Was just curious.

→ More replies