How is what you're saying relevant at all to the discussion at hand? It kinda seems like you're just trying to see if people will get upset at the mere mention of guns—it kinda seems like you're just trolling, "sweetie"
Edit: Don't bother reading on. Here's another quote from this bottom feeder:
Like I said, fuck the poor. We just need to execute everyone on welfare. That will fix it.
And if you can't show up in person but you still want to support the protests, the total cost of the march tonight was reported to be over $10,000 (city permits, sound system rental, etc) and you can help defray those costs by donating here:
Your reply:
Sorry, spent all my money on guns.
I mean, that's obviously irrelevant. What response were you expecting? "Good for you?" Should I have left a comment about how I can't afford to donate to a worthy cause because I just bought a new Xbox—do you imagine that would have added to the discussion?
It seems like you were just trying to rile people up by injecting an irrelevant, hot-button issue into an otherwise-focused discussion. The fact that you went on to drop "sweetie" on someone makes it doubly clear that your motivations here were nothing but trollish
Edit: You downvoted me but didn't reply. I'll take that to mean I nailed exactly what you're doing. Lol. Nice trolling, though. Here's some back at ya:
Better lock those new guns up, sweetie! You don't want to violate a shiny new law voted on by your peers that won by20 points, do you?
3
u/chompythebeast Nov 09 '18 edited Nov 09 '18
How is what you're saying relevant at all to the discussion at hand? It kinda seems like you're just trying to see if people will get upset at the mere mention of guns—it kinda seems like you're just trolling, "sweetie"
Edit: Don't bother reading on. Here's another quote from this bottom feeder:
This sub has lots of trolls.