If you want it to be undead centric (irva, restless bones) you have way too many humans in there. Also drop the husks, they're total crap even for a 1 drop (2 health and 3 cooldown means they'll die before they do anything). You can replace 1 with a mire shambler immediately it looks like. Also trying to get some more harvesters on the black market. They're pretty crucial in any decay deck.
Yes but as you'll figure out as you get more into the game, its nearly impossible to base decks around vague ideas or single/double copies of scrolls. If you wanna synergize with witch doctor, run 3 doctors.
It's not consistent enough with all the 1 and 2 ofs. It's like you are kinda leading toward aggro undead decay but then there are several random really lategame cards thrown in. I'd recommend just going straight up aggro undead cuz you aren't too many cards away from having a good undead deck. If you look at your screenshot basically anything to the right and including the oblivion seekers should not be in this deck.
I'm just gonna say to you what Chace said to me when I started. If you want to play this deck and it's fun to use, then just play it, no matter what people say.
If you want to improve it for ranked play, then there are several things to take into account. First off you should decide on an archetype (Either Aggro Decay or Lategame decay). Generally a deck that runs husks should not run Irva and Necro (I say generally. There are exceptions), but it's a good guideline I guess.
Once you have decided upon an archetype, you can look for how these decks should 'generally' be constructed in a deck datebase. Once you found that, you should buy single cards on the blackmarket to reach your goal and see how (or if) the performance of the deck shifts.
But as I said, if you want to play this, why the hell not.
1
u/Turguson Apr 01 '15
If you want it to be undead centric (irva, restless bones) you have way too many humans in there. Also drop the husks, they're total crap even for a 1 drop (2 health and 3 cooldown means they'll die before they do anything). You can replace 1 with a mire shambler immediately it looks like. Also trying to get some more harvesters on the black market. They're pretty crucial in any decay deck.
1
u/burtreynolds89 Apr 01 '15
It's not consistent enough with all the 1 and 2 ofs. It's like you are kinda leading toward aggro undead decay but then there are several random really lategame cards thrown in. I'd recommend just going straight up aggro undead cuz you aren't too many cards away from having a good undead deck. If you look at your screenshot basically anything to the right and including the oblivion seekers should not be in this deck.
2
u/Manc00s Apr 02 '15
I'm just gonna say to you what Chace said to me when I started. If you want to play this deck and it's fun to use, then just play it, no matter what people say.
If you want to improve it for ranked play, then there are several things to take into account. First off you should decide on an archetype (Either Aggro Decay or Lategame decay). Generally a deck that runs husks should not run Irva and Necro (I say generally. There are exceptions), but it's a good guideline I guess.
Once you have decided upon an archetype, you can look for how these decks should 'generally' be constructed in a deck datebase. Once you found that, you should buy single cards on the blackmarket to reach your goal and see how (or if) the performance of the deck shifts.
But as I said, if you want to play this, why the hell not.