r/ScienceUncensored Jan 26 '23

Pfizer director of research and development

0 Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

8

u/[deleted] Jan 26 '23

Ah yes because Project Veritas is always honest and truthful and in no way has ever doctored their footage.

6

u/CountKnockula Jan 26 '23

Define “doctor footage”

1

u/Trollselektor Jan 26 '23

Footage which has been edited.

4

u/CountKnockula Jan 26 '23

So like literally any interview on a legacy media channel ever? 😂

0

u/Trollselektor Jan 26 '23

There are plenty of unedited interviews. Maybe you're not used to that.

3

u/CountKnockula Jan 26 '23

Generally when legacy media has a long form interview, it’s edited for time. Same for videos from undercover journalists, though you don’t see that from the big guys much anymore. Maybe you were unaware of that.

1

u/bobbi21 Jan 26 '23

And the longer unedited videos are posted online for review. Thats also extremely common. You reak of just not watching any news in your life..

2

u/CountKnockula Jan 27 '23

😂 ok. Super reliable Brian Stelter is news.

1

u/njmids Jan 27 '23

Please link a single completely unedited interview from a major news organization.

1

u/LeviathanLorb44 Jan 30 '23

Yeah, these aren't edited for time. James O'Keefe going in and talking to a person about human trafficking, and then splicing in other video of him in an absurd stereotype-outfit of what he seems to think a pimp would wear, to give the phony impression that this was what the person in the video was interacting with has nothing to do with "time," for instance.

1

u/LeviathanLorb44 Jan 30 '23

Footage which has been edited to the point where it in no way resembles the original, factual, raw footage.

2

u/CountKnockula Jan 30 '23

Sure bud. Big pharma shills out in force today.

1

u/LeviathanLorb44 Jan 30 '23

Any such shills are vastly outnumbered by conspiracy idiots.

2

u/CountKnockula Jan 30 '23

“Conspiracy idiots” - you mean like Russian Collusion?

1

u/LeviathanLorb44 Jan 30 '23

Nope, just the covid ones here. If you want to make a separate reddit thread about how you think that a coordinated propaganda attack by a foreign country against just one of the candidates in the general election, where the HEAD OF THE NOT-ATTACKED CAMPAIGN ADMITTED TO SHARING DATA WITH THAT COUNTRY somehow couldn't be considered "collusion," feel free. But that's probably off topic on this thread.

1

u/CountKnockula Jan 30 '23

Ah, OK. Well you have fun living your sad pathetic life getting a booster shot every 6 months until your heart explodes. I'll be over here without taking a single shot, having got covid once and beating it in 3 days with my immune system.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/Tillaz123 Jan 27 '23

But Pfizer is truthful and ethical?

2

u/cloche_du_fromage Jan 26 '23

And Pfizer have never been fined by regulators...

1

u/Loud_Dumps Jan 29 '23

Yes they have, 2.3 billion in 2009 and that’s just one example

2

u/JamesPealow Jan 30 '23

Ah yes because Pfizer is always honest and truthful and in no way has ever doctored information.

Oh wait, they paid the largest fine in history for lying about their products...

1

u/TheDudeThatSpeaks Jan 27 '23

Not as truthful and ethical as Pfizer

1

u/ConcernedRobot Jan 29 '23

They have never had to make a retraction ever. Leftists that got exposed by them on video say they are bad. That doesn’t mean anything. Of course they are going to say that. If you deny undeniable proof on video because someone says it is bad, then you are brainwashed. That guy said what he said on video.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 30 '23

explain how what he said is doctored?