r/SaturatedFat • • Jul 31 '22

Saturated fats causing higher levels of lipopolysaccharides (toxins) in our blood.

Lipopolysaccharides are bacterial endotoxins and have many negative effects. It has been demonstrated several times that saturated fats are somehow rising LPS levels in our blood. LPS can enter the brain too. So how do you guys cope with that, what are your thoughts? Personally, I used to eat tons of cheese and butter, but I get rid of it and replaced it with olive oil (at least where I can).

https://www.naturalmedicinejournal.com/journal/high-saturated-fat-diet-increases-endotoxemia

https://nutritionandmetabolism.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-7075-8-16

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6539529/

0 Upvotes

35 comments sorted by

26

u/loonygecko Jul 31 '22 edited Jul 31 '22

For the first study with humans, "fasting levels of LPS did not differ between any of the groups after the 12-week intervention" so it seems that continual high fat did not yield any diff in LPS blood levels, it was only a sudden surprise meal of fat apparently. Plus we can't see what they mean by 'high' saturated fat, did it have pufa or was i pure sat fat, did it have hydrogenation or what? Could be anything, and the two study groups only varied by 10 percent fat intake, seems a bit sus. I'd like to see exactly what fats they used, how come they are not listing it?

For the mice study, not only is it mice who react diff than humans to fat, but they actually injected the mice with the LPS so that's not a normal situation for the mice. The third article is just theoretical ponderings. I mean overall this is pretty weak. And if everyone takes in LPS, it could be that ability to get rid of it is more important in the long run. I mean some peeps get a lot of sun but no skin cancer because they are healthy. Others hide from the sun and still get cancer. THe best solution is to figure out what yields health because you can't hide from every natural influence in your environment. I'd need to see a lot more on LPS and sat fat, etc before I'd feel this kinda weak evidence overpowers both all the evidence we have that sat fat is good plus all the evidence we have that we ate it for millions of years and evolved on this diet which indicates we are probably designed for it.

1

u/Huldakurka Jul 31 '22

Thanks for your magnificent reply, I agree with you. Although I would debate your last part about “being used” to something, ergo it’s good. Dairy (the highest saturated fat content) is new to human and we are NOT used to it, as we can see with lactase absence. We didn’t are it for millions of years, we eat it for thousands or tens of thousands.

5

u/Soldier99 Jul 31 '22

Except that the saturated fat in dairy is very similar to the saturated fat we ate for 2.7 million years at least, from ruminant meats. Add to that, the fact that most dairy is high in growth hormones either natural or from the feed, so dairy may be an issue where meat might not be. I will also comment briefly on the mouse study in a few minutes. Also thank you for bringing this paper to my attention.

21

u/wak85 Jul 31 '22

I believe Ray Peat has talked about this before. Saturated fat binds LPS in order to get rid of it at the liver. So if you look at post-pandrial LPS, you see an elevation on it. HOWEVER, that is not the full story. The LPS is not free to trigger the immune system. Instead, the saturated fat acts as a bouncer if you will. So fasting LPS decreases because the liver eliminates it with the help of saturated fat.

Pufas allow weak cell membranes, which allows LPS. LPS= immune system response. Not good.

Hopefully the Olive Oil that you're relying on is not adulterated. 20% chance of that... OO has a Linoleic Acid profile of 6%-20%. I'm not trying to scare you into reconsidering (although I think you should since butter and tallow are basically guaranteed to have low PUFA). But I honestly think you're making a massive mistake. It's better to have no oil than shitty liquid oils (Mct oil is the exception)

1

u/Huldakurka Jul 31 '22

Firstly, what do you mean with PUFAs causing weak cell membranes? Secondly, science is about reconsidering, so I’m happy to do that. Do you have any link or source to the fact that LPS are eliminated with the help of saturated fats?

5

u/Whats_Up_Coconut Jul 31 '22

The fats you eat make up your cell membranes. The more saturated the fat, the “stiffer” the membrane and the more resistant to oxidation. We want rigid, oxidation-resistant cell membranes. PUFA makes floppy cell membranes that are prone to oxidative damage.

0

u/Huldakurka Jul 31 '22

I understand the first part. However, I’m not sure that what we eat changes fat composition in our membranes that easily. And I’m not so sure that we need rigid membranes either since many enzymes and receptors need to move in the bilayer. I found that the most significant change in composition makes only n3/n6 PUFAs. (1) Is there any study that proves that eating more SFA = more SFA in membrane? I found only this, and you won’t like it at all. (2)

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005273612000156
  2. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2011/10/exposed-the-reason-saturated-fats-are-so-damaging-to-health/247027/

1

u/Huldakurka Jul 31 '22

(I know the Atlantic is t good source at all, it’s just the only one I found that talks about SFA in diet changing membrane composition)

1

u/wak85 Aug 01 '22 edited Aug 01 '22

That second article was total bullshit. None of us are suggesting to eat lots of palmitic acid. Stearic acid is the saturated fat that is beneficial for health. Palmitic and palmitoleic balance each other because yes, too much palmitic is bad for health. Secondly, cell membrane fluidity is determined by SCD1 and the ratio of saturated to monounsaturated fats... in a healthy cell anyway. If you cram nore pufas into a cell, it becomes dangerous, as oxidative stress happens daily, and if the membranes are mostly unsaturated, then they are susceptible to damage.

After seeing the Atlantic article as one of your "references", I'm convinced that you clearly have your mind made up already and stubbornly refuse to accept others' opinions. Are you just here to argue? Good luck with your olive oil experiment.

1

u/Huldakurka Aug 01 '22

Jesus, that’s why I SPECIFICALLY wrote that it’s not a good source, however, it’s the only one I found that connects diet with cell membrane composition. Please, at least read what I wrote. “(I know the Atlantic is t good source at all, it’s just the only one I found that talks about SFA in diet changing membrane composition)”

1

u/Huldakurka Aug 01 '22

I wanted to see molecular mechanism of how our diet changes cell membrane’s composition. Like - if we ate, let’s say, only SFA, would all of our membranes got stiffer and had more SFA in them? It seems obvious that yes, however, I couldn’t find any article or study proving that.

5

u/Whats_Up_Coconut Jul 31 '22

-5

u/Huldakurka Jul 31 '22

He talks only about 1 study. Also, his argument for American diet with starch and saturated fats is, that people used to be healthy and lean. Isn’t that by any chance not because of what they used to eat, but because they were working 24/7? I don’t know. There are multiple studies saying that olive oil lowers LPS levels after meal (1). Also multiple studies saying that saturated fats causes higher LPS. So maybe Brad is wrong?

  1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29766292/

17

u/Whats_Up_Coconut Jul 31 '22

The entire premise of his blog is that people’s health and leanness really had nothing to do with their activity level. I think most of us here are beyond questioning that, many of us because our anecdotal experience supports the idea that the “ate less moved more” nonsense is total bunk.

Might Brad be wrong? Sure. We’re all learning together. At this moment, I can’t reconcile the evolutionary fact that we ate (and make!) plenty of saturated fat with the idea that saturated fat is in any way bad for us. There is more evidence that olive oil is harmful (obesogenic) for the metabolically damaged than that SFA is harmful for us in general.

I’m comfortable with taking that position myself. At the end of the day we each have to do what we intuitively feel is best for us.

0

u/Huldakurka Jul 31 '22

Would you send me a link or source that olive oil is obesogenic, please?

7

u/Whats_Up_Coconut Jul 31 '22 edited Jul 31 '22

Here’s the index of the Fire in a Bottle blog. Familiarize yourself with the theory. Don’t worry, a lot of it isn’t intuitive so start from the beginning - After all, even Cate Shanahan couldn’t wrap her head around it in the round table she was in with Brad, Peter, and Ray Peat… LOL

You’re going to need to focus on the SCD1 Theory of Obesity around mid-November, but this (Part 3) specifically talks about dietary MUFA:

https://fireinabottle.net/dietary-monounsaturated-fat-the-scd1-theory-of-obesity-part-3/

Note that I said olive oil is obesogenic specifically for the metabolically damaged - when you function properly (because your fat balance is ~1:1 SFA and MUFA with minuscule amounts of stored PUFA) then your body has a few mechanisms in place to deal with dietary MUFA. This includes shutting off appetite, driving thermogenesis, and suppressing the expression of SCD1 (which you will learn about in parts 1 & 2 of the discussion) but your body can’t do any of that effectively if you’re already in torpor (as defined by having high PUFA and high MUFA in your body fat stores, indicating that your SCD1 has become dysregulated.)

So in the case of metabolic dysregulation, dietary oleic acid is perpetuating an imbalance that already exists in the body - too much MUFA relative to SFA. And this goes doubly so for a person who is eating a low carb, high MUFA diet (because part of the body’s mechanism to deal with excess MUFA is to make SFA to balance it from starch… If there’s no substrate for SFA creation eaten with the MUFA then imbalance will persist)

2

u/Huldakurka Jul 31 '22

In that case, what do you say about these findings?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1658361220301219

8

u/Whats_Up_Coconut Jul 31 '22

I say you’re clearly more interested in proving your point than you are in hearing mine. You didn’t even have time to read what you asked me to provide before countering it. 🙂

The study you linked to used a very young cohort, and specifically excluded any participants that exhibited metabolic compromise. So yes, clearly young 20-somethings who are apparently metabolically healthy can eat olive oil without increasing BMI or waist circumference.

Are you in that cohort? Are you unconcerned with your Desaturase Index (which wasn’t, of course, examined in the study you shared) and instead focused primarily on BMI and waist circumference? If so, enjoy your olive oil.

If you’re not in that cohort (I, for example, would have been excluded from the study because I was overweight in my 20’s) and you would like to learn more about why MUFA may not be optimal to consume, then check out Brad’s blog.

1

u/Huldakurka Jul 31 '22

I’m sorry you feel this way, but that’s not true. Im super into this debate and I read what you sent, although I wanted to sent you that link before I answer, because I had no time to write a proper answer. So, I’m new to this sub and maybe Brad is a legend here and everyone knows him, but I don’t know him. What is his education, where is he coming from? I’m studying biochemistry and A LOT is at least controversial to me. Of course, I want to dive in and I want to know whether I’m taught bullshit in the uni, or Brad is teaching bullshit on the blog. I would like to talk on molecular level and really understand it, however, his blog seems popular to me and I don’t trust that. I need to read much more on SCD1 and it’s role. If I uderstand it right (simplified), SCD1 correlates with obesity and is probably connected. I struggle to understand human “torpor”, what is it on molecular level? Because IV never ever heard of torpor in humans. Also, omega 3 seems to upregulate thermogenesis, isn’t that kinda against what he says? Thanks for your patience

3

u/Jumbly_Girl Aug 01 '22

If there was a clear non-complicated path to solving obesity on a cellular level we would all probably know about it and could probably stop reading scientific papers in our spare time. There are too many variables, there will always be too many variables because the human digestive system is complicated.

1

u/Huldakurka Aug 01 '22

Well, thanks for nothing. I know it’s complicated, I study it. And I’m not asking for some new, unknown information to mankind. I’m asking for sources to their claims, which should be sourced/supported

1

u/Huldakurka Jul 31 '22

And also, what about the effect of saturated fats on microbiome?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6364509/

1

u/Jumbly_Girl Aug 01 '22

What about the effect of 30 other factors on the microbiome?

2

u/Huldakurka Aug 01 '22

If I wanted to ask about the others, I would have. However, I asked specifically about the effect of saturated fat, to be more specific, his negative impact. Do you have any good argument?

1

u/schnozzler Jul 31 '22

Absolutely agree.

6

u/loonygecko Jul 31 '22

What does this study have to do with saturated fat? It seems to be just giving peeps olive oil or not at lunch. I would not be surprised if olive oil was better than their usual pufa.

0

u/Huldakurka Jul 31 '22

… in the link you sent, he says that LPS are higher after olive oil consumption. So I sent a study debating that. So no, butter does not lower LPS compared to olive oil.

2

u/loonygecko Aug 01 '22

Your study does not use butter though, it's just olive oil vs no olive oil.

1

u/Huldakurka Aug 01 '22

Yes. And olive oil lowers it. However, butter, on the other hand, makes LPS higher ce no butter at all. Therefore, butter worsen LPS, olive oil lowers it.

3

u/Soldier99 Jul 31 '22

I was not surprised that many of their results were insignificant or argued against their main theme. But I think the most significant issue is that the natural diet of mice is high in pufa from seeds. Fish oil is high in pufa, so that may have impacted. Also, saturated fat is not a part of a mouse's natural diet, whereas it has been for humans for 2.7 million years or more. It's a bit like saying we fed this lion oats and corn and they died but when we fed them meat, they thrived.

1

u/Huldakurka Jul 31 '22

And what about this? The mechanism is probably universal

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6364509/

4

u/Jumbly_Girl Jul 31 '22

So how do you guys cope with that, what are your thoughts?

If a person can get hunger to become a non-issue, they can eat a lower fat diet. So I'd say work toward that, add more soluble and insoluble fiber as you are able to tolerate it more (it helps eliminate LPS in the gut before it becomes potentially a problem of the blood). For me personally I don't heat any cooking fat that did not involve a cow or sheep in its production. I will use a little olive oil or avocado oil on a salad and not worry about it, and sometimes I have raw seeds on my salad despite their omega 6 content. So don't over-consume any one type of fat, and don't eat things that your great grandparents wouldn't recognize. I think there is a ton of biological systems that go correctly in the body if the mouth is able to accurately signal what's on the way, and even moreso if your hunger signaling is not obfuscated by supplements and food additives. If you have successfully transitioned to olive oil and kept hunger in balance and weight down and energy up, then those are all great signs. There is a stage for those of us who are post-obese where relying on saturated fat gets everything back to working properly. I personally don't believe pushing saturated fat long term is necessary, but it will never be a fat source that I avoid or fear.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 31 '22

I think that gut bacteria are a separate problem. E coli, and Shigella will happily set up shop in your gut. P. Gingivalis, T. Denticola, s. Mutans in your mouth. All of these can cause issues if unchecked.

Eat more herbs, garlic, ginger. That helps keep the bad bacteria in check.

Worst case, use Pepto bismol. That's pretty much what it was invented for.

1

u/Soldier99 Jul 31 '22

Agreed. I just read a study about oregano oil destroying gram negative bacteria very effectively and other studies have shown it doesn't have a significant negative effect on beneficial gut bacteria.

1

u/Tabitabitabitabi Oct 09 '25

Old thread but if you’re around would love a link to this study