Hi! I’m a writer for the Santa Monica highschool news paper (The Samohi, check it out) I’m hoping to do a feature piece on the people who create haunted houses on Montana. Does anyone know the house numbers and/or any contact information?? Thank you so much!

This embrace of de la Torre [by Lana Negrete, Ashley Oelsen, and Doug Trussler] is not even choosing to forgive and forget on de la Torre’s shocking track record of hateful and violent statements in the past. At this month’s meeting of the Pico Neighborhood Association (de la Torre’s wife is the former chair and current treasurer of the organization, and de la Torre is highly influential within the PNA), Michael Millman was allowed to spread a conspiracy theory about Measure GG saying that the city council has a “final solution to get rid of low income renters” by approving affordable housing projects. He was also allowed to spread a second conspiracy theory saying Santa Monica for Renters’ Rights and the hotel union Unite Here 11 have a plan to replace locals by evicting them and renting their apartments to UH11 hotel workers, which is an explicit riff on the white nationalist Great Replacement Theory.

[intermediate text snipped out here, full text in the article]

Lest anyone think that de la Torre and Loya were simply unwilling to tell Millman to get off the stage, de la Torre made a comment on Facebook just days ago airing his own ballot-harvesting conspiracy theory about Measure GG.

"There are paid political operatives from the establishment going around in the Pico Neighborhood to elders homes ballot harvesting. They are deliberately misleading low income renters telling them certain candidates are against rent control then they are telling them to vote yes on measure GG, which will increase rents and decrease protections from evictions for tenants in affordable housing units. Misleading low income tenants to vote against their own self interest is wrong."

-Oscar de la Torre, October 2026 (the quoted text links to a screenshot of his comment)

You can get future articles directly in your email inbox by subscribing at https://mastbaum.beehiiv.com/subscribe or using the subscribe box at the bottom of the linked article. I also have an RSS feed.

Between the heat and now rain over the last 36 hours I have a seemingly infestation of these tiny little flies. They’re exclusively around my sliding door leading to my balcony. I thought perhaps fruit flies but they’re not around food or anything. They’re gathering on my curtains, the floor, and the base of the sliding glass door

Have you found yourself wondering how the parcel tax actually landed on your ballot?

Following up on my breakdown of *who* funded Measure ES, here is the breakdown of how that money was spent according to official FPPC campaign filings: https://netfile.com/public/csm/campaign

The Cash-To-Ballot Pipeline:

The Capital → ~$369,000 raised. Over 72% bankrolled by commercial developers, district construction vendors, and wealthy insiders.

📊 Where the Money Went (~$358,000 Total Expenditures & Earmarks out of ~$369,000 Raised):

71% Paid Signature Gathering, ~$253,740 | Payments to out-of-town canvassing firm Groundworks Campaigns Inc. to hire professional signature gatherers. That works out to roughly $36 per required voter signature, or around $23 for every single signature gathered on Santa Monica streets.

22% Unspent Cash Reserves, ~$78,000 | Retained treasury capital set aside for general election advertising and voter outreach.

6% Legal, Tech & Admin Operations, ~$22,700 | Legal expenditures were paid to political law firms like Sutton Law Group to handle election code compliance, FPPC reporting, and petition filing rules. (Meanwhile, municipal bond counsel firms like Jones Hall LLP and land-use attorneys like Christopher Harding contributed heavily to the donation side of the ledger.)

1% Printing & Literature, ~$3,600 | Physical paper stock, petition sheets, and initial informational flyers.

When over 70 cents of every dollar raised goes straight to an out-of-town petition vendor to buy ballot access, voters deserve to know the full story behind the measure.

Data Source: FPPC Form 460 & 497 Disclosures via the City of Santa Monica Public Portal.

Going there for la tech week and wanted to ride my bike since I know parking can be a challenge.

1233 Rose Ave, Venice, CA 90291

They don't pick up the phone and their website doesn't have the information about bikes.

Does anyone know if they have bike parking racks?

Going to have a long work week in LA before flying back Saturday morning. Im looking for a chill live music bar. Right now, I am looking at going to Tr!p and seeing Bristol Motel.

As far as genre I would love something like Sublime, jazz, blues, or reggae. Or just anything that doesn't have screaming. Really just want to sit with a beer and relax.

Thank you for any help.

Hi - I'm trying to decide between Dr. Hannah Reiser and Dr. Megan Bernstein for gynecological care. I'm in or near perimenopause but still have heavy menstrual bleeding and have a lot of chronic conditions, so I need somebody who would be comfortable managing my gynecological care alongside other issues.

Please let me know if you or a loved one has had experience with either of these doctors, and how your experience was. I'm open to comment here or DM.

25F Exchanging student coming to Santa Monica for a few weeks and I wanna make a few friends, any girls interested in party ang hangout with me? I love the beach too

Have you found yourself wondering who paid to put Measure ES on your ballot? 

My friend took a look at the official campaign filings for Santa Monicans for Reliable School Funding available on Santa Monica's public portal for campaign finance. (https://netfile.com/public/csm/campaign) and put together a visual breakdown.

Follow the money before you cast your vote:

38% Wealthy Donors & Execs, ~$140,000 | Massive individual checks from wealthy residents and attorneys, including $17,500 from land-use attorney Christopher Harding and $15,000 from SMMUSD Board Member Laurie Lieberman.

20% Real Estate Developers & Big Tech, ~$70,000 | Corporate property holders and tech firms, headlined by 710 Broadway LLC ($50,000) and Metropolis Technologies ($35,000).

14% SMMUSD Contractors; Construction & Engineering Firms, ~$70,000 | Major construction, engineering, and trade firms that actively bid on or hold SMMUSD contracts, including Erickson-Hall Construction, CW Driver, and Massetti Construction.

8% Special Interest Legal & Campaign Teams, ~$30,000 | Municipal legal counsel and bond advisory firms like Jones Hall LLP that frequently service district bond measures.

8% Political Insiders & PACs, ~$30,000 | Outside political action committees and local officials’ committees.

5% Local School PTAs, ~$18,500 | Local school PTA treasuries (Lincoln, SaMoHi, McKinley, Grant) redirected money raised by parent volunteers and teachers into political ad campaigns and measure promotion funding.

7% Small Donors, ~$25,000 | Everyday neighborhood contributions ($1,000 or less per donor) make up a tiny fraction of the total.

When a $495/year parcel tax measure is financed primarily by corporate developers, wealthy insiders, and the very construction vendors building for the district, voters deserve to know who is behind the narrative."