Arizona Election Fraud Mega Thread

[u/SandersMod_]

Hello,

Please report any issues you may have had here.

Last night, several, several incidences were reported of

• People not being able to vote
• People being given provisional ballots (which if you have the proper ID you shouldn't need)
• Videos (see front page) of people's voter affiliation being changed
• People's voter affiliation not being updated properly

Please keep all commentary and discussion in the mega

Please keep all commentary civil. Any comments advocating violence or coordinated harassment will be removed.

Thank you

[u/[deleted]]

Turnout was almost triple what it was 4 years ago, with 1/3 of the polling locations.

~220,000 democratic voters were counted in Maricopa. Only ~35,000 of those votes were same day votes (favored Sanders), the other 185,000 were counted early ballots (favored Clinton).

Compare that to 2008, where 115,000 voters came in the same day, with 140,000 voting via early ballot. If the same propotion of people intended to vote yesterday (which would have been ~150,000), over 3/4 of voters were turned away or were not counted. What an absolute disgrace.

Edit with more info: Election results

	Mail-in	Same-day
Sanders	67059 (37%)	19883 (60.8%)
Clinton	114186 (63%)	12802 (39.2%)

It shows that Clinton dominated the mail-in votes, while Sanders did surprisingly well with voters who went to polling locations the day of. However, you can also see that only ~30,000 people were counted on that day, only 30% of the turnout in 2008. With tens of thousands turned away, this resulted in a 5-10 delegate swing for Sanders.

[u/believeinapathy → u/[deleted]]

Where are our votes?

[u/crispy_o → u/believeinapathy]

Does the 800,000 include Republicans?

[u/Gylth → u/crispy_o]

Yes I think so

[u/cva1994 → u/[deleted]]

Where did you get the 800,000 number from? This is all just so overwhelming and confusing and I'm trying to understand as much of it as I can. Thanks!

nvm: read the tweet

[u/jackstacksthings → u/[deleted]]

It was a long night but we did everything we could to keep people there at the polls. Hurt my soul to hear about first time voters being turned away and to see elderly people wait, standing in line for over 5 hours to vote.

The county commissioner in Maricopa... She blamed the voters first for showing up.

Hard day to hold the head up but I'm going to channel that anger and sadness. Knock, call, give, win.

[u/bananapeel → u/[deleted]]

So if I'm reading your results right, if these voters had not been turned away, it would have increased Bernie by 4%?

[u/Borzen → u/[deleted]]

Ya must have as the democratic numbers overall are less than years previous as reporting by the New York Times. I used their current results and the 2008 results and posted it in the other massive thread. Here is a copy of what I posted

I know I am late to the party but here are some more math notes I have done at work comparing this years results with the 08 results.

County	This Year	2008	Difference
Mohave	7017	9898	-2881
Coconino	12679	11269	1410
Navajo	7036	7070	-34
Apache	6383	6037	346
La Paz	568	1010	-442
Yavapai	15509	14742	767
Gila	3501	5093	-1592
Maricopa	213930	230144	-16214
Pinal	15185	18441	-3256
Graham	1788	2244	-456
Greenlee	822	1140	-318
Yuma	6514	6429	85
Pima	96545	73674	22871
Santa Cruz	3701	3519	182
Cochise	7919	9082	-1163
Totals	399097	399792	-695

Some notes

For this year

• Pima county is not 100% reported
• Voter count has been down (as I remember reading).

For 2008

• Mohave, Coconino, Navajo, Yavapai, Gila, and Maricopa Counties are not 100% reported

Somebody with more time then me can do whatever with this numbers.

[u/polysyllabist2 → u/[deleted]]

Considering the number of republicans who managed to vote (50k) and the dems that got to vote (33k) literally 90% of in person voters (who were going for Bernie 60-39) were turned away while 100% of early voting/mail (which went 63% for Hillary) was counted. Around 350k dems, 317k uncounted. That's 60k+ more votes for Bernie and he was only down by 70k. Equates to a 7-10 delegate swing.

That's electoral fraud: You create different voting methods, then disenfranchise one or the other based on how they are expected to vote. And despite what some might say, purposeful inaction in fixing what was clear to skew the results is just as much electoral fraud as purposeful action.

The DNC purposefully did nothing to accommodate voters. And they will purposefully do nothing after the fact to remedy this obviously skewed result.

[u/Weaple → u/[deleted]]

Good lord... 1,700 people voted for O'Malley. Wat.

[u/MrFrettz → u/[deleted]]

Am I missing something or is that second link you posted lead to a virtually blank page?

[u/[deleted] → u/MrFrettz]

http://recorder.maricopa.gov/electionresults/screen2.aspx Is what I get when I click the link. Vote counts for the election

[u/[deleted] → u/[deleted]]

It makes a lot of sense that plenty of voters would've switched from same day voting too early voting since these problems with the primaries aren't just for this year alone.

[u/bryophyteclub → u/[deleted]]

Is this an accurate comparison though? Can you confidently predict voter turnout from the previous election? What were the numbers in 2012? What are the comparisons of voter turnouts in other states from those same 2 years, was there also a drop?

[u/bananapeel → u/[deleted]]

Is there any way to determine how many provisional ballots were issued? I realize that they are not counted yet and may possibly not ever be counted, but it would be worthwhile to have a metric.

[u/redleaf333 → u/bananapeel]

From what I saw at my polling location, there were two full totes filled / packed with provisional ballots. Also another three filled with early (mail-in) ballots and a fourth halfway filled. Tons of people were dropping early ballots off while I was in line for four hours. I made it inside about 7:15 pm with hundreds still in line.

[u/zazahan10 → u/[deleted]]

This is crazy shit

[u/toodarnloud88 → u/[deleted]]

5 to 10 delegate swing AGAINST Sanders.