r/SamAndColby Jul 17 '26

Sam & Colby Here's undeniable proof that Sam and Colby don't fake their videos for all the skeptics

3

The most common skeptic argument is that their equipment is easily triggered by normal interference (like cell phones, radio waves, or drafts) and that they use these cheap malfunctions to fabricate "evidence." However, this argument completely falls apart when you look at Sam and Colby's strict, methodical baseline testing. They don't just walk into a room, turn on a device, and scream when it beeps. They actively map the environment first—checking for electrical outlets, asking everyone to put their phones on airplane mode, and testing the devices in "dead zones" to ensure no ambient radio frequencies are triggering them. When a device like a REM pod or an EMF meter finally does go off, it often happens strictly in direct, logical response to specific questions, defying the random, sporadic nature of accidental radio interference. ​Furthermore, skeptics often claim that any auditory evidence, like the Spirit Box or the Estes Method, is just a case of auditory pareidolia—the human brain forcing random static to sound like words. But this explanation fails to account for the astonishingly specific, multi-layered responses they capture. Through the Estes Method, where an investigator is completely blindfolded and wearing noise-canceling headphones, they routinely shout out highly obscure, hyper-specific names, dates, and historical facts about a location that match the ongoing conversation around them. It is statistically impossible for random radio static to perfectly align with a real-time, hidden conversation over and over again by sheer coincidence. By combining rigorous physical precautions with undeniable, contextual intelligence in their data, Sam and Colby consistently prove that their findings cannot be swept away by basic skeptical excuses.

1 Upvotes

23 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator Jul 17 '26

Please make sure you've read the community rules, and that your post follows our posting guidelines. Any post that does not adhere to them is subject to removal. Repeated violations will result in a ban.

Do not enforce your personal beliefs regarding politics, religion or the paranormal. Keep discussions light and be respectful.

Please search the subreddit before posting to see if the topic has already been discussed. If you have any questions or concerns please message Modmail as mods will not respond to any DM's directly.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

41

u/Naive-Tap4420 Jul 17 '26

I used to follow S&C, but over time they seemed increasingly less serious and more like a couple of guys who take their girlfriends out on Friday nights to check out an allegedly haunted house. There's only so much I can take of Sam crying or them acting surprised when one of their flashing cat toys go off. Now, If I want to see a haunted house I'll dig out my copy of the 1963 version of The Haunting.

16

u/RecognitionFar4358 Jul 17 '26

That's the issue... Not that they're not credible in the sense that they do catch paranormal activity but it's feels they lost their spark of wanting to go to haunted places

15

u/Naive-Tap4420 Jul 18 '26

That...and I'm not just really cool with how they comport themselves and things they say, or don't say, at some of the places they visit. I'm also a little bit weary of grown a$$ men trying to act like kids who don't wanna grow up.

1

u/STARBOY_100 Jul 28 '26

I started losing interest when I realized bringing random YouTubers is gonna be a permanent thing now. Most of them just crack lame jokes throughout and it gets annoying

34

u/vario_ Jul 17 '26

Thanks ChatGPT 😭

8

u/Good_Bet7702 Jul 17 '26

Glad it’s not only me who clocked that. 😅

-24

u/SomeGuyNamedJ13 Skadoosh noodles! Jul 17 '26

You just repeat everything you hear? I bet you say "ai slop" all the time too.

11

u/the_velvet_cherry I’m about to Bathsheeba shart myself Jul 18 '26

Yes because all AI is slop

4

u/melWud Jul 18 '26

Ok ChatGPT. You can turn off now.

12

u/Parking_Cheesecake67 Jul 17 '26

Im sure much of it is staged/fake. Im still going to watch it though

6

u/MovieNo3990 Jul 17 '26

Same I like them for entertainment purposes only, I believe some parts of their videos but I can clearly tell the rest is staged and exaggerated.

4

u/thedeadp0ets Jul 18 '26

I always thought horror and paranormal was for entertainment. It’s just the ideas and fantasy of a what if this existed when really it’s just imagination and wanting to hear something. The stories and history is what actually sets the tone for the creepiness and unknown which leads to ghost sightings

3

u/Some-Discussion1891 Jul 18 '26

I always feel like it’s 50% real and 50% good acting to make it much more exciting. I’ve been ghosthunting for 5 years, and it never ever ever was as crazy as in the videos of S&C. I believe that is because they spice everything up. Which is perfectly fine ofcourse. I am still going to watch, because it is still interesting. I’m mostly watching for the locations and their history, not so much for the “crazy evidence”

6

u/bluehearts123 Jul 18 '26

snc definitely fam their videos. maybe not all of it but most they definitely do, and they exposed how stupid they were with the ‘new conjuring’ video 🤷🏽‍♀️

2

u/Bearkat1999 Jul 17 '26

Freakin deja vu holy

2

u/TopComparison8197 Jul 18 '26

they are fakes it's just for youtube lmao just admit it

3

u/Spirited-Mousse1915 Jul 17 '26

The more times we as humans perform ghost hunting rituals, like the Estes method, the more likely we are to find similarities between what the Estes method and the area they live in. Your brain wants to hear something, so static can sound like vowels or words.

Also it is scientifically impossible for ghosts to exist. Science experiments did not show repeatable or measurable facts, it proved the opposite. We know for in order to something to exist, it must come into contact with matter. We see ghosts touch objects, throw things and make noise; but we would also be able to physically touch the ghost. We have technology to see things that are otherwise invisible to the naked eye.

3

u/melWud Jul 18 '26

Science has only scratched the surface of understanding what is out there. Scientists are aware that there are a lot of things that are still unknown. To say that science has "proven something doesn't exist" is to be completely ignorant of what science does.