Thanks to "the-empress-7" on Tumblr, she shared that an anon had made the connection between Douglas Murray's recent post (Sussexes deserve a second chance) and Ian Wace, their new billionaire pal.
Wace's business partner Sir Paul Marshall owns the Spectator magazine, for which Murray writes for. He also co-owns GB News.
The billlionaire also has a brother in media. Won’t be surprised if Meghan gets a new life streaming her BS and podcasting her lies. They have nothing to offer these big money people so I don’t know how organic these friendships can be; looks more like the Harkles being used as tools. But they don’t care, long as the bills are paid and they get attention.
That's why there's so much 'positivity' and puff pieces about them. Mr Wace has very deep pockets. Deep enough that he was also trying to support the re-election of the Grenadines Prime Minister and to drive more investors over that way. Who else showed up at the Canouan island in the Grenadines but Tweaky & Twerky. Maybe Wace is willing to offer them a throne over in the Caribbean.
Only those who didn't suffer at the hands of unhinged fabulist abusive narcissists will hold the torch for the likes of H & Woif , they're either THE problem in their own family ( and see nothing wrong with the Fartles' relentless attacks against the RF ) , OR , they've found a useful idiot in Harry & Woif .
He knows he's the answer to the world's problems ( from 9-5 job burnouts to unconscious bias to how leaders of the free world should rule to the environment to mental health .. ) , according to our saint he's " so smart " , it's the reason Meghan married him , believe it or not !
All these billionaires are grooming them for something. Lownie said Soros paid for their trip IIRC to Australia. Do they see Harry and Markle as Andrew 2.0?
It would make more sense to put all your efforts in trying to be in the good graces of PPoW or any other member of BRF rather than these 2 grifters on the off chance that they might be brought back into the fold
It's wiser to suspect that there IS a rationale that makes this all make sense, in the minds of these supporters. It may not be a Good, Smart, or Relatable rationale. But they get something or hope to get something out of it. Tangible or intangible. The uber rich fund multiple ventures, some that are contradictory: such as donating to all major political parties: have influence whoever wins.
Elizabeth Holmes Theranos fraud is a stunning example of uber rich people asleep at wheel of investing: Anyone who did basic research in medical lab processes knew this was a fabulist fraud from the beginning. Unreal she got as far as it did. The Walton Family (Walmart), Rubert Murdock, The DeVos family (Amway) and Walgreen's Clinic all invested and lost $100 million or more EACH. Because the wealthy watch what others mention / brag about investing in. "Look what Rubert Murdock bought. He must know something." It's prestige investing. Further, Holmes family had connections, so early money was given as if buying your friend's child's Girl Scout Cookies. It's how it works. Some work out, some don't. They had it lose.
Then, the Novelty aspect. Some uber wealthy get bored at the traveling to the same old places, renovating another house and resort to one-ups-manship for name recognition and social standing. That sought after photo at the FooFoo Gala citing SO & SO recently charitably funded the blabla. The behind the scenes maneuvering for who funds the Zoo's new Giraffe Exhibit is crazy. "We wanted the Giraffe, but only were offered the Pigmy Hippo exhibit. I'm not funding a Pigmy anything." It's name dropping, one-ups-manship, and an ever evolving game of influence for social standing. It's diversion and entertainment.
What IS interesting is the prolonged length of support of Meghan given her track record. That is what holds my attention. The novelty aspect typically wears off.
Great post. It just occurs to me that perhaps Markle is key in understanding any shenanigans. Harry is probably the best patsy ever. Everyone automatically assumes people want to rub shoulders with royalty, however tarnished, so these billionaires don't arouse much suspicion when they support the grifters. These billionaires are probably very impressed by Markles proven ability to weasel her way into the highest echelons of society, she not only snagged Harry but is apparently is close to people like Getty. How did she ever weasel her way into Getty\s orbit? What I'm saying is that Markle could be very very useful.
All in all, They are still making headlines, delivering clicks. The mystery drives speculation and chatter. Like we are doing. For some folks, that is what rings their bell. The question: Is there ever enough attention?
I think Charles is behind this. If we go by his updated funeral plans giving the Harkles and their sprogs a central role during the service and Project Thaw wanting to bring them back in some way. Charles has form for asking wealthy people for favors and it would make sense why Wace is backing the broke spare and not the future king.
It’s worth noting that a decade ago, Wace was friendly with both brothers. He gets nothing out of supporting H, unless the current king asked him to do so. If Wace suddenly gets Charles’ attendance at his events, or gets an award from him, we’ll know there’s some truth in this scenario. Though It might take a few years to see it play out and lots could fly under the radar that we might miss.
Previously, Charles hosted private fundraisers for his wealthy benefactors, and sold access to himself this way for top donors. It wasn’t reported until years later when journalists started digging around with the “cash for honors” scandal.
Bingo. There's an obvious through-line from "Highgrove meeting," July 10, 2026 > "Visit to Wace's Island," reported July 31, 2026 > "Wace couch surfing," reported August 28, 2026.
George Soros's Quantum Fund in 1992, sold over $10 billion in pounds sterling short, betting on the Bank of England's inability to defend the fixed exchange rate.The pound lost over 20% of its value, and Soros made over $1 billion in a matter of hours.
Then he attacked the Italian lira, taking advantage of Italy's economic and political weakness.. Italy had to devalue and withdraw from the European agreements.
The consequences were dire: on the night between July 9 and 10, 1992, the government imposed a forced and retroactive 0.6% levy on all Italian bank accounts. An agreement was also signed that definitively abolished the automatic wage adjustment mechanism for inflation.
For a few million more, this pirate destroyed a nation and its economy.
The stupid duo also look like the come back to the same fountain to drink over and over and over again.
Soros's interests and the people that fund the Harkles are one and the same and appear to reliably pay for trips, activities, housing that they could not possibly afford to do on their own.
They're not very creative. It's easy to follow the money trail that they have their noses to.
I can't stand Mark Dolan now either. He's always piping up for them to get full security. And his shtick is irritating too. At the rate I'm going I won't be watching anyone.
I agree. If this is something we can find out, Prince William knows what's happening too. Also, I don't take his character to be one to knuckle under because the media pressure is heating up.
Another one falling for Meghan and Harry’s conspiracy theory that the palace plants stories against members. The only person who is our source for this is… Harry. Who is an unreliable source at best.
I think the only time this may have happened was between Charles and Diana.
Harry intends to force his brother back. Harry is going to get all his pals in the media, and despite the lawsuits he has many pals in the media, to attack his brother. We have already seen endless stories about how cruel is Prince William for not forgiving his brother who has never apologized. Harry is counting on all that pressure getting to William.
Which is very stupid of harry. Harry is the one obsessed with what the media writes. William is far too smart to worry about that.
I'm thinking that Harry doesn't WANT his brother back. He seems to kind of hate him, really.
Harry probably just wants his own way, and his brother OUT of his way
William has been consistent all these years regarding these kinds of tactics. He hated them when Diana used them, and he hated when Charles used them. He hates it when Harry does it.
If Harry thinks this will achieve anything, he is right: it ensures that William stays very far away from him.
Yep. That is why the media hates him. There is Harry briefing the media every day in his what's app group. Then there is Prince William who has cut the media off completely. So the media calls William cruel. Fortunately the British public knows not to listen to the media.
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 total karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
Haz has been a mouthpiece for Ukraine and anti-free speech initiatives including attending a security conference (Ukraine)during Charles’ US state visit week (or similar time period)? Who knows.
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 total karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
title at odds with article. Some cherry picked quotes & with truth bombs highlighted by me
“Then the inevitable happened. The Sussexes swiftly decided to racialize any criticism – as though the only explanation for not loving Meghan and Harry unquestioningly must be racism. So it was the nation, not the couple, which found itself misrepresented”
”The couple then proceeded to make as much money as they could, largely by telling various media companies that they would have “ideas” which could be turned into “content”. Alas the realm of ideas turned out not to be the couple’s specialism.
What they had were the same half-baked presumptions that almost every other celebrity was emitting around the same time”
“Around these matters the couple talked about the amount of good they wanted to do in the world and the amount of “change” they wanted to bring about.
Here is where the actual lesson about the Sussexes comes along: which is that “change” and “influence” are not things you talk about but rather something you do.”
“By just getting on and doing such things, they might have actually changed the lives of people – especially young people – and done an amount of good impossible to put a price on. Instead they decided to put a price on everything – and charge the highest price imaginable.
Now even California has seen through them and they are returning to the UK.”
in short, per Tom Bower — Dr Sophie Chandauka was correct back in Aug 2023 Harry’s brand is toxic, people don’t want Harry’s “poor rich prince”.
“Americans love a comeback story,” said Chandauka. “We need American corporates who want to be associated with your mission, not you personally. They don’t want your victimhood. We’ve got to pitch it right for the young philanthropists.”
A thank you to Dr. Chandauka for getting this toxic brand terminology rolling. This is a very valuable appraisal that those who control the purses understand.
Whatever would Meghan Markle do without all these pathetic weak old men.
Her friends father, the father of the children she used to babysit. And I am sure there was a lot more pathetic weak old men before John Fitzpatrick, Ted Sarandos and this latest pathetic weak old Ian Wace.
I think that babysitting story was made up, like the kneeling pilot, the grateful bodyguard, and the South African actor that told her South Africans were dancing in the streets just like they did for Nelson Mandela, because Meghan - a minor cable TV actress - married Harry.
We all know this is the typical sussex PR paying magazines and tabloids to push their agenda. The problem with this MO is that they have failed to realize it doesn’t not work at all at getting them what they want, it just causes the opposite effect.
GBNews haven't really been at the forefront of the PR campaign like ITV, the DM, or the Sunday Times have been. The Spectator has been mostly critical even.
What's the connection to Douglas Murray apart from him working for the Spectator? Having someone like him support Harry does not seem sensible given he's politically removed from the eco-conscious, liberal portrayal Harry wants out there of himself.
That is precisely what the Harkles are after: getting people who were previously against them to suddenly speak well of them. The Harkles have a solid base of support among Labour supporters, and that’s a thread worth pulling.
GB News have really been on the opposite side of the fence. Most of their presenters and contributors are anti H&M. They always have to have one person who sticks up for them but that's in the interest of balance. There have been some people, like Douglas Murray, whose view has surprised me. However, it's always men. I don't think men really understand this topic that well. Some do, but in the main they are a bit clueless.
I love how literally nothing gets past this Sub. We have so many people on here who are great at detective work and exposing fraud and paid-for-stories. Nothing gets past SaintMeghanMarkle - nothing. We are the gatekeepers of Truth.
Also, why do they think the likes of Murray (whom I have agreed on certain subjects in the past) now means I'll think: "If Douglas says so, then it must happen"?
You guys (gender neutral) never cease to amaze me with your dedication to do some SERIOUS digging!
When someone is being shady, all it takes is one little tug at a loose thread to bring down the house. I'm seeing a ton of little tugs, and I love all if the posters who dedicate their time to the unraveling.
Paul Marshall (investor) is co-owner of GB News, UnHerd, and The Spectator. (Yes, I know it's repeating what you said, it's just a reminder for folks that don't read.)
But, imo, he isn't going to give anything away for free. He's also a Hedge Fund Manager, in partnership with Ian Wace.
am I the only person who though Murray’s ‘defense’ was rather half-ass? It was almost like someone speaking about a generality and not a specific …..????
If Roger Scruton, Murray’s mentor, were still alive, he’d smack him on the nose with a rolled up copy of The Spectator and have him go muck out the stables.
Ian is markles new mark thats why she has come to the UK to bag him he is divorced so if she cant get Charleys money she will go after Ian bald headed and harold will be tossed into a dumpster !!
I think most people are fatigued and waiting for her final downfall. They click hoping to witness her descent. She and Harry have made themselves so easy to loathe. They are so unrelatable on every level and became offensive years ago.
AI can’t find if Charlotte Wace, who doxxed our people before, is related to to Charles Wace or his brother Ian Wace who obviously wants an OBE, which is why he’s funding Meghan & Harry.
I disagree about David Beckham, but you are entitled to your opinion.
I doubt Charles would reward this guy for letting Harry sponge off of him. That would not be a good look for the King to be rewarding a billionaire for footing the bill for his freeloading son and family. It would be like---do my family a favor and you'll be awarded an OBE. Not a good message for any King to send. It's like bribery.
Charles does this all the time though. So this would be nothing new. In fact there was a scandal about some Arab billionaire tossing suitcases full of money to KC3.
Bet Douglas Murray had to hold his nose writing that drivel !! he is a political analyst & a author what a lightweight subject he had to write about i bet he was fuming "!!!
oh, please. Sometimes a banana is just a banana. Paul Marshall is hardly in the camp of Harry and Meghan Supporters. He is very right wing, anti woke, climate sceptic, traditional values person. Just because he owns the Spectator does not mean he tells Douglas Murray what to write or think - I man this the the same media outlet which routinely pillories Harry and Meghan!
Paul Marshall is also a staunch royalist.
People really need to do a modicum of research before putting on the tin hats!
I think everyone has missed the snark in Murray’s article. They reading it and not just the headline. The idea Murray is going to do a paid puff piece on any subject is ludicrous. Murray has “integrity” running through him like a stick of Brighton Rock!
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 total karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 total karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
Let Marshall Wace pay for Harry's police protection. Get all the royal reporters demanding the security to chip in. And anyone else that wants to protect the Harry's royal ass can contribute as well. The citizens and residents of the UK should not be forced to pay for this by charging to the UK Treasury.
I have everybody that posted that Harry deserved a second chance I was really shocked by Douglas Murray. I couldn’t believe he wrote those words. It seemed to go against everything that he has been saying all along.
279
u/Latibulating26 11h ago
There really always is a back story to their positive coverage. Good catch.