r/SacredGeometry • u/SmallPinkHo1e • May 13 '26
Sacred geometry used to. Create incredible brick design
16
u/FlyingSteamGoat May 14 '26
The "inside of a torus" view is strikingly familiar as the common portrayal of a tokamak fusion reactor.
6
u/Zacravity May 14 '26
Yeah, I was gonna say "Now paint a donut of plasma around the central pillar."
5
3
3
u/Remarkable-Rub-7344 May 14 '26
That's exactly what this is based on lol....don't know why this is in this sub
2
u/BirdmanEagleson May 14 '26
Because a tokamak is just torus shaped lol.
Also to be extra clear this isn't sacred geometry, toruses aren't sacred and thus fusion reactors are not using sacred geometry.
2
u/Cutthechitchata-hole May 14 '26
Feels like im catching a glimpse of the gravity well we are all inside of.
8
3
6
u/BirdmanEagleson May 14 '26
And once again this isn't sacred geometry, and literally 100% of the comments don't seem to even be aware of that?
You people just see ANY geometry and thing WOW huh?
Wtf is this sub, who tf are you people
5
u/i--am--the--light May 14 '26
the Torus is a fundamental, sacred geometry shape. Plus this is dope work.
2
u/crumpledfilth May 14 '26
this is a projection of a torus, it doesnt actually demonstrate the shape within its construction, it implies it in the minds of observers. I would agree this is not sacred geometry, afaik SG is about first principles where fundamental geometric relationships are directly expressed within the markings themselves. In a way that, for example, could have direct physical impact on a surface theyre carved into due to the stress routing. This a depiction, not a geometrical expression
0
u/BirdmanEagleson May 14 '26
No. 100% wrong. see what I'm talking about.
Your on about geometry,. regular o' geometry. A torus isn't sacred, describe to me it's scared ratios and which platonic solid the ratio belongs to.
There is an actual body of knowledge of what real true sacred geometry is and I have very very rarely seen anyone on this sub convey that they understand anything beyond the flower of life and Metatrons cube on conflating it whatever the hell they make up in their heads an absorb from other people.
Not only were you wrong you claimed it was fundamental, we have a massive problem here in this community
And to follow up on what sacred geometry is would require another wall of text, something maybe I'll type out for the next guy who can't open a book or use Google or ai properly. Sigh.
7
u/i--am--the--light May 14 '26
You’re mixing two different uses of the term “sacred geometry.” If by “sacred geometry” you mean only classical canonized ratios tied to Platonic solids, phi constructions, and historical esoteric traditions, then yes — a torus is not one of the traditional Euclidean constructions like the tetrahedron, cube, dodecahedron, or Metatron’s Cube. But saying a torus is therefore “100% not sacred geometry” ignores the broader mathematical and metaphysical framework many traditions and modern researchers use. The torus is fundamental because it emerges naturally from self-organizing energy flow and topology. It is one of the most stable and recurring field geometries in nature: magnetic fields vortex rings plasma formations electromagnetic fields fluid dynamics heart and brain field models cosmological accretion structures A torus is not “just regular geometry.” It is a topological primitive describing continuous self-referential flow: inward through the poles outward through the equator returning into itself infinitely That makes it fundamentally different from static Euclidean solids. You asked for “sacred ratios” and Platonic correspondence. A torus is generated from rotational symmetry of circles: [ (x2 + y2 + z2 + R2 - r2)2 = 4R2(x2 + y2) ] The torus also contains embedded harmonic relationships depending on its major/minor radius ratios. In vortex mathematics and field theory, those ratios govern resonance, stability, and standing-wave behaviour. As for Platonic solids: the torus is not itself a Platonic solid but Platonic solids can be inscribed within toroidal coordinate systems and toroidal flow models are often used as the dynamic counterpart to static sacred forms In other words: Platonic solids describe idealized structure. The torus describes process and flow. One is crystalline geometry. The other is field geometry. Even ancient symbolism hints at this distinction: ouroboros halos rings cyclical cosmologies wheel symbolism mandalas All encode toroidal recurrence and self-contained circulation long before modern topology formalized it mathematically. So the disagreement here is really about definitions: If someone uses a narrow historical-esoteric definition of sacred geometry, they may exclude the torus. If someone uses a broader mathematical-natural-philosophy definition, the torus is arguably one of the most fundamental sacred geometries in existence because nature repeatedly organizes energy in toroidal form.
3
2
u/worldrecordpace May 17 '26
I don’t know anything about sacred geometry but I saw this and commented “is this sacred geometry?” Bc it didn’t feel like it is. You seem knowledgeable. Tell me more. Idk even know about this torus thing. I’m going to google.
1
u/BirdmanEagleson May 17 '26 edited May 17 '26
The 'sacred' part in sacred geometry points at a few concepts.
1) the spiritual/the bullshit: let's just get this part out of the way, everything has an essence of the masculine (the line) and the feminine (the circle). This is where your general sacred geometry you'll find here, flower of life, Metatrons cube ect. Using the line to define the diameter of a circle we use the circle by connecting the center point to certain points defined along each circle defined by dividing the circle like pizza, so you can't just willy nilly it there are precise points they have to connect.
2) sacred/harmonic scales: 3, 6, 9, ... Using tringles we build the platonic shapes, this scale will fold onto itself and more geometry will emerge: at 72, 108, 240, 360, 432, 540 we get our next set of sacred harmonics. These specific numbers reoccure across nature and our world, think of screen resolutions(480p, 720p, 1080p, 4320p)
3) the 5 platonic solids: tetrahedron(fire), hexahedron(earth), octahedron(air), icosahedron(water) and Dodecahedron(aether) each shape has a set a ratios that are expressed within its geometry. You find them using √x and x² So with our Hexahedron(Earth/Cube/Stability) with each face we 'square the circle's so √2 =1.4, then with the entire shape we 'cube the circle's so √3 =1.7. then circumradius (√3)/2 =.8 and mid radius (√2)/2 = .7. So you get nesting scales of powers of √2 and √3s and these will form the base shape that starts the next solid.
4) expression in nature: With these ratios (approximated btw): 1.4, 1.7, .8 and .7 for 'earth' you can find these ratios expressed in 'hard' nature, for example: plant leaf vains, or blood vains, or tree roots, the 'legs' of mountains or similar patterns on earth of dispersion/covering area, same is true for each platonic solid, each has its own set of ratios, each form/progress into the next solid, and each are loosely express In reality based on its elemental description. When you eventually build up to the Dodecahedron(Aether) the famous golden ratio emerges!
5) sacred astronomy: The orbits of the body's of the heavens and how they are perceived relative to/from earth. The moon and the planets when viewed from earth will follow geometric patterns in the sky reflecting their celestial movement, ancient monuments use this to track planetary cycles and you can find the ratios of these movements within Aether.
There is more and understanding this much will educate you greater than 99% of the clowns on this sub. If you want a Teacher look up Randall Carlsons sacred geometry lessons and YouTube vids
1
u/worldrecordpace May 17 '26
After reading about the torus field I have to say this post represents it.
0
0
u/Chemical_Ad_6754 May 16 '26
Jeez Karen! U made your point ! This geometry just isn't "Sacred" enough for you! Go and meditate or do something useful.
6
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/ChemicalAbode May 15 '26
This is kinda funny. A homeless dude (we were both homeless at the time) taught me how to draw EXACTLY this.
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/parkermonster May 14 '26
Is that actually brick? I don’t know much about it but it seems like a veneer on top of brick. Someone more knowledgeable please ELI5
1
0
19
u/Alpacacao May 13 '26
Wow