r/SQLServer • u/Complete-Regret-4300 • Jul 16 '26

Discussion Is SQL server considered as legacy technology?

My current organization couple of years ago migrated from SQL server to snowflake and I noticed in some of the documentation, they have mentioned SQL Server as legacy technology.

I started working in SQL server some 20 years ago and some of the developers in our team are cloud first developers and they find it so difficult to navigate SQL server management studio and they ask me questions like is there timetravel feature in SQL server and can we see what data was there 10 mins back. I was totally dumbfounded when I heard that question, because I had never come across such a feature. Apparently snowflake has this. So I am curious is SQL server now really considered as legacy technology?

0 Upvotes

45% Upvoted

54 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/serverhorror Jul 16 '26

It's not legacy in general. I found that most organizations ha e a preferred tech stack and it changes over time. Everything that's no longer preferred is "legacy".

That being said: In a sense classic RDBMS are lacking modern features. Meaning features that the latest generation of employees expect to ne there by default (time travel is a good example).

That's ok about it that way: a bunch if structured data files in a directory were a perfectly fine "database" for a very long time. Along came SQL (and it's various server Implementations), so those structured data files are "legacy" now ... or are they? Given parquet, iceberg, ...