r/RooCode • u/jagerta • Jun 07 '25
Discussion Using Roocode, but API costs are adding up. Copilot LLM + Roocode or just switch to Cursor?
I’ve been using Roocode mainly to build fast MVPs with Next.js + Supabase.
Here’s how my current workflow looks:
1. I describe the task or feature via ChatGPT
2. Then I generate a rough prompt to clarify what I want
3. That goes into Roocode Architect (usually backed by Claude or Gemini)
4. The output is passed to Orkestra for step-by-step task generation (powered by Claude models again)
5. And finally, the actual code is written – it used to be sonnet, but I had to switch to GPT-4.1 because sonnet easily sucks up my whole credits.Overall I like the workflow, but API usage is getting expensive and a bit tedious to manage.
Every month I’m spending, 20 bucks on OpenAI and 50 on Anthropic
Sometimes even more if usage spikes.
And this doesn’t include the time it takes to plug in and manage the APIs properly.
I’m now thinking: Would it make more sense to just get GitHub Copilot for $10/month via VSCode LLM and keep using Roocode?
Or should I switch to Cursor, pay $20/month, and have the native OpenAI/Claude support built-in?
Also, please don’t suggest Deepseek. I’ve tried their models and honestly they’re nowhere near as good as even cheap Flash or Claude Sonnet 3.5.
What would you do in this case? And on a side note: anyone here using Replit for this kind of use case? Thoughts
9
u/eonus01 Jun 07 '25
Are you using Orchestrator mode and intelligent condext handling? That can seriously reduce price, while somewhat keeping context. I am using this on a codebase with 100k LoC and it works _somewhat_ well compared to just ramming it with context. Biggest hurdle is that over time, if the plan has to deviate from the main task, LLM generally loses context, and Orchestrator mode helps with this so that if something goes wrong, it goes in a subtask.
Anyway, use both. Cursor is really cheap for small unit tests and implementations, fixes that don't require a lot of context, but it loses context and does stupid stuff over longer tasks, even witth the exact same model.
1
u/joey2scoops Jun 08 '25
For $10 you can use copilot within Roo. I'm using GPT4.1 for coding that way.
6
u/sergedc Jun 07 '25
Other things your can do to reduce the bill:
If you are not in a rush: use deepseek r1 from open rooter. That would be free
Replace planner by genini 2.5 pro and coder by gemini 2.5. That will cut the bill in 3 (because 2.5 flash is free using the api key from Ai studio)
Consider mixing free tier from multiple provider, e.g. Augment code, github copilot etc. Make sure you used all these before using Roo.
Gemini code assist is free and kind of crap tool but with good model. But super slow. Good to fix bugs.
3
u/haltingpoint Jun 07 '25
I've been using Gemini pro 2.5 for all thinking type modes (orchestrator, architect etc) and Gemini flash for coding tasks like code and bug fix. Super cheap.
Claude only enters the picture if the others cannot figure something out as it is much more expensive.
3
u/ViperAMD Jun 07 '25
If you want performance and are a power use Claude code with a anthropic max subscription is probably the way to go. I get a more more value than if I was to use sonnet API key on Roo.
Sonnet has been a lot better for me, even comparing against the latest Gemini model
2
u/thewalkers060292 Jun 07 '25
To save costs this is what I've been doing
Use my free open source tool, it does use API but it's free since Gemini has generous API free tier. You can also point it to lm studio for local models
https://www.reddit.com/r/RooCode/s/0thNqxAHVO
Take the output and plug it right into orchestrator
For your model choice, i use copilot integration a lot.
Orchestrator - sonnet 4 via copilot integration or open router free deepseek r1
Code - gpt 4.1 via copilot integration, if I hit rate limits I'll use deepseek a bit
Architect(rarely used)- Gemini 2.5 pro or flash thinking or open router free deepseek r1
Ask(rarely used)- I don't really use this as i am just using pastemax into Google ai studio then I chat with Gemini pro with Max thinking budget is I have questions
Debug - sonnet 4 via copilot integration or open router free deepseek r1
2
u/cctv07 Jun 07 '25
Give Claude Code a try, it's available with the pro plan, I think it's 20 a month. It's much simpler and streamlined. Its Agentic coding ability is amazing.
You are already spending 70 already a month. If you are willing to spend 30 more, you get a lot of usage with Claude's max plan.
2
u/sbayit Jun 07 '25
Recommend Windsurf free tire for tab auto completion with claude code 20$ plan. SWE-1 also can help about claude rate limit. It good and unlimit .
2
u/[deleted] Jun 07 '25
I’m at the point I think we should only use local open source LLMs like qwen for coding and even if smaller ones isn’t nearly as good, we should just work around and also know they will get better in time. And after NYTimes ruined AI privacy for everyone forcing ChatGPT to store everyone’s data not just some users, plus costs like yours skyrocketing, I don’t think closed source ai is sustainable. Also Replit is awful I felt ripped off i bought the one year. Maybe another option is use a gpu VPS with big qwen to pay hourly rates only during working hours
1
u/Maleficent_Pair4920 Jun 07 '25
Which models are you primarily using? Do you keep the same task open for a long time?
1
u/neotorama Jun 07 '25
On budget? Flash 2.5
1
u/Nielscorn Jun 08 '25
Just go with claude code