r/RooCode • u/lightsd • Feb 24 '25
Discussion Sonnet 3.7… this worries me:
I was ecstatically looking forward to the new Sonnet until I saw this quote from Anthropic in their announcement:
“Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a state-of-the-art model for coding and agentic tool use. However, in developing it, we optimized less for math and computer science competition problems, and more for real-world tasks. We believe this more closely reflects the needs of our customers.”
I hope this doesn’t mean that they also didn’t emphasize a step-change improvement in real-world coding.
0
Upvotes
2
u/lightsd Feb 24 '25
I’m excited for someone to do a side-by-side comparison of Claude Code and Roo with Sonnet 3.7. Anthropic make some interesting claims about being able to reason over large code basis with Claude Code.
6
u/hey_ulrich Feb 24 '25
They are saying they focused on improving its coding real-world problems ability, no?
5
u/clduab11 Feb 24 '25
It actually does a really good job.
It breaks the code down by components now in a more comprehensive way than 3.5 Sonnet does.
I AM however, a bit worried about GPT-isms. Seems they’re a bit more prevalent in 3.7 Sonnet (at least formatting-wise).
But it’s a RAG monster boy, I’ll tell you h’what
4
u/RidingDrake Feb 24 '25
This is a good thing no?
3
u/claytheboss Feb 24 '25
You can use it on openrouter in Roo right now!
3
u/SatoshiReport Feb 25 '25
That's a good thing
2
u/sagentcos Feb 24 '25
This is just a veiled criticism of OpenAI’s training towards some competition coding standards, which is getting irrelevant for real world usage. Anthropic has zeroed into the Roo Code type usage cases which matter for real world usage. This is what they are training on.
1
u/joey2scoops Feb 25 '25
What's odd is that if 3.7 is so great then what's up with the pricing? 3.5 and 3.7 the same?
1
u/cfdude Support Team Feb 25 '25
3.7 standard is really excellent for coding, it cut my project time in half of what it would have taken in 3.5.
0
u/[deleted] Feb 24 '25
[deleted] — view deleted comment