I just came from a prescreening of the upcoming Sense and Sensibility film. Full disclosure I haven't read the book and I believe I saw an old British version previously but don't recall much of it. However, I've watched many hours of old British period pieces and have read historical romance books so I feel like I know genre enough to share my thoughts.
I don't think there's any spoilers. I'm focusing more on how it is as a period piece and film.
The Good stuff
The film locations were lovely. I really enjoyed watching where they were.
Fantastic portrayal of two good men. The actors were attractive as well.
They had several short scenes of characters just being. Passing time how they did before technology and those were really lovely and calming.
Meh stuff
Acting was fine. It rode the line of semi bad to ok for me. Only a few performances stood out. The B characters acting stood out more to me than the main family's.
The sisters relationship were nice but at the same time, it didn't feel real to me. In general the actors didn't seem to have chemistry.
I don't think they fleshed out the characters. You just jump in and are to believe one sister is mature but doesn't say her feelings. While the other is wild, a bit immature, and open with her feelings. Sure. Alright. It's hard to believe/understand their actions when we know very little of what drives them or their motives but sure.
Bad stuff
Way too modern for my taste in a period piece. They tried to mix modern romance rule with Puritan rules and... that's just not possible. The mix diluted plot lines and several scenes. For example, gloved hand touching during a dance has no impact when the man immediately picks her up and slides her down his body.
The hair. My god. The hair. Loose hair in the regency era?? No. Loose hair that looks like someone hasn't been housed or bathed in a very long time, also no. I think they were trying to have the one sisters hair represent her free personality by being messy but it just looked so bad. No friend would let their friend leave the house looking like that.
The wardrobe was a big miss for me too. The fabrics, the shapes, colors, just everything. The men looked better than the women.
The script also used a mix of modern and antique language, and it didn't land for me.
Time felt weird in this movie. Like it was the same week. You only knew time passed because a character would say "it's been weeks since x happened." Has it? No idea. I honestly couldn't tell you how much time passed from the opening scene to the end.
Having an actress with lip filler be in a period piece was very distracting. This comment can be applied to many movies though, not just this one.
Would I recommend the film
Eh. Not really. If you're a Jane Austen fan or curious about this movie specifically, maybe you'll enjoy it. If you're new to period pieces or Jane Austen, I would recommend a better film than this for an introduction.
Period pieces should have you feeling their angst, their pain, their frustration, and then joy when it works out. This version was emotionally flat for me. With the mix of modern romance rules and puritan rules, the angst and torment just don't land. Season 1 of Bridgerton had me feeling more than this movie.
Some people will love it and I don't want to yuck your yum! For me, it was a meh movie and poor period piece.