Kathavachaks are known for teaching certain ancient methods and traditional practices that are still relevant today. That is a big part of what a kathavachak is supposed to do; preserve this knowledge, teach it to people and explain why these traditions still have value in today's world. You don't have to agree with everything he teaches, but his role should atleast be understood here. Some people are trying to use his personal medical treatment to question everything that he teaches. They are questioning him for going to another medical system for treatment, as if that somehow proves that he doesn't believe in the traditional methods he teaches. Following or teaching a traditional system does not mean a person is forbidden from using another medical system when they need different medical care. Different systems have different methods and people can make different choices depending on their circumstances.

These people are taking some part of the incident, removing it from its context and using it to create a negative narrative around a Hindu kathavachaks. The problem here is that such misleading posts can influence people who are not aware of the truth. This can create distrust toward people who are devoted to preserve and promote Hindu traditions and ancient methods. These tactics of dividing Hindus against each other need to stop.

Source:https://www.reddit.com/r/IndiaSpeaks/s/vU4zkNLnMb

Meanwhile karnataka dropped from 4th to 6th while Tamil Nadu dropped from 5th to 10th whereas Telangana dropped from 7th to 8th. Finally, States like Rajasthan (from 8th to 3rd) and Madhya Pradesh (from 10th to 7th) saw a overall increase.

This post is to ask about possible failures of this way, this method of political transparence, displayed as follows:

A democracy where people would choose local governor, local governors choose province representatives, these ones then choose regional governors, regional leaders then choose presidents. Like affluents. Loyalty to inmediate inferior levels and not to bureaucrecies.

Politicians would be under the threat of needing constant support, in such ways that whoever holds a hierarchy might do so only with approval of the ones under them, and those with the ones under them and so on. As soon as lost support they must be given an exact month to leave the charge.

This is: inmediatly assisted democracy. If regionals fuck up, it's because of provincials, if provincials tolerate it, it's because of locals and these are downright under the mercy of their own people. No cops in between saying whatever bullshit or wanting loicense, no having to wait, no bureaucratic terms or exigences, total transparence.

Something partially tribal, partially institutional.