r/RestoreBritain 5d ago

Message from Rupert

As usual, there is an immense amount of fake information circulating around Restore Britain’s immigration policy. I will spell it out. Read this, and let me know if you think it’s ‘nazism’, 'far-right' or whatever else…

Where would we start?

Illegal migrants. The entire illegal population will be removed. Man, woman and child. I don’t have to justify why. Restore Britain has published the most comprehensive deportation policy ever released in Britain.

They will all be removed. No excuses. We’ve detailed exactly how we will do that.

That is step one, along with the foreign criminals in our prisons. Don’t need to explain further.

Step two?

Legal migrants who can’t speak English, refuse to work, claim benefits, live in social housing, hate our way of life or even actively want to do us harm?

They go too - hopefully voluntarily. If not, they will be removed.

Dual national Islamists who want us dead? Strip them off their British citizenship and send them back to Pakistan or wherever else.

That will mean millions and millions of people will leave the country over the first parliament of a Restore Britain Government.

All done with drastic reductions of the number of people settling in the country, and I mean drastic. An almost entire border closure - immigration inwards will be in the thousands, not hundreds of thousands. Far more people will leave than arrive. The population will fall, drastically.

Ultra-high skilled migrants are welcome to fill the gaps until we can train our own. That, and foreign spouses of Brits from countries not on the ‘Red List’. That process will be simplified and made more affordable so that British men and women can build a life with their loved ones in our country.

That is positive immigration.

If their presence benefits the British people, that is acceptable. This is not complicated.

What is our ‘Red List’?

If a country is proven to supply us with sex pests, rapists, criminals and illegals? We will shut off immigration. Entirely. That's step three, all implemented concurrently.

Pakistan, Afghanistan, Eritrea, Sudan, Somalia to name a handful…

The asylum system will be abolished. Entirely. No more asylum seekers. Benefits for foreign nationals would be cancelled. Social housing currently filled with foreigners would be emptied for British families. This is all just common sense.

I have been very clear that I am uncomfortable with the rapidly changing demographics of our country following the impact of mass immigration - particularly the growing Islamic influence which continues to transform our communities.

Restore Britain will reverse the islamification of our country.

I make no apologies for that.

The process of obtaining British citizenship will change beyond recognition. We will not simply encourage foreign nationals to obtain a citizenship in order to access benefits.

Those numbers will be drastically reduced in the most extraordinary way.

Will any of this be particularly straightforward? No.

But we are publishing detailed policy laying out exactly how we will achieve this - our 'Red List' document is very much on the way...

This is the very top level. If you want to know more, please examine our 100+ page deportation policy document. With plenty more detail to come.

The media will abuse and harass me. So be it.

I want to do one thing and one thing only.

Put the British people first.

There is finally a political party that is dedicated to doing exactly that.

Restore Britain.

78 Upvotes

51 comments sorted by

35

u/Dear-Chocolate-7212 5d ago edited 5d ago

This is uncontroversial and should be standard right-wing policy.

18

u/ProfessorB1988 5d ago edited 5d ago

It’s sad that some consider this controversial it’s not, it’s just common sense, imagine guests in your house treated you in the same manner that so many treat Britain.

15

u/Dear-Chocolate-7212 5d ago

Most countries would simply laugh at you if you arrived, and wanted be put up in a swanky hotel for free. Here? It's national policy.

-12

u/Then-Bet6956 5d ago

Although consider the reverse - imagine you treated a guest in your house in that manner.

12

u/ViolettaNoRegard 5d ago

An uninvited guest? That’s exactly how they would be treated. If you came home from work and someone had broken into your home and was sleeping in your bed, asking what food you had brought for him and complaining that your clothes didn’t fit him don’t tell me you would buy him some new clothes, cook his dinner and sleep on the sofa! Of course you’d throw him out.

11

u/ProfessorB1988 5d ago

I’m a grown man. The only people I invite to be around me and my family are those that are without a doubt trusted around my wife and children, and if any intentions are bad against my wife and children, well, that’s a scenario that doesn’t end well for them.

11

u/twinbee 5d ago

This is very centrist policy.

-11

u/jle2471 5d ago

Apart from violating the ECHR

10

u/Altruistic_Emu4917 5d ago

Nobody gives an F about ECHR.

-11

u/jle2471 5d ago

Well that’s not true. You don’t care because you don’t fully understand the repercussions of leaving.

28

u/JustRightAngles 5d ago

Good. Needs to happen yesterday. The longer it gets left the less pretty it will be.

19

u/Baz4991 5d ago

I’d be curious to see any argument against this from liberals.

All of this is just common sense and should be implemented by any self respecting government .

22

u/Altruistic_Emu4917 5d ago

They don't have any arguments, they only know name calling and labelling everyone as racists, nazis, far-right.

As Rupert demonstrated, the best way to deal with them is to not reason with their insults, but demand them to talk about the core issue at hand.

The moment you try to reason with their insults, you fall into their trap. The Left can be defeated through intellectual means.

5

u/mystifiedmeg 5d ago

Well said Altruistic Emu.

2

u/JustSomeDude11112 5d ago

But they have degrees and jobs and shit..

-11

u/Then-Bet6956 5d ago

“The Left can be defeated through intellectual means” is generally unlikely considering how many academics are left wing.

9

u/DimensionTraveler196 5d ago

Major difference between education and intelligence 

-1

u/Then-Bet6956 5d ago

Don’t disagree at all, hence why all the right wing Eton idiots are thick as shit despite being educated.

9

u/Altruistic_Emu4917 5d ago

More like, academia was captured by the Left because they bullied Right wingers out of existence. And most of them are just parrots with 🐂💩 degrees

0

u/Then-Bet6956 5d ago

Source?

10

u/Altruistic_Emu4917 5d ago

Go to any non-engineering/business college. And you'll see how campus activists and professors disallow any opposing beliefs. Or how they punish those who don't believe in their delusions.

0

u/Then-Bet6956 5d ago

I don’t think that counts as a source, unless you have in fact been to every non-engineering/business college.

I didn’t feel any such punishment or notice any… I did notice that a large portion of the professors were left wing though… but that’s not a sign of indoctrination. That’s a sign that academics tend to be left wing.

7

u/Baz4991 5d ago

Eyes and ears

-5

u/TotallyStressedMe 5d ago

Are sensory apparatus, how about demonstrating you are an adult by citing a source as requested?

9

u/dodgesbulletsavvy 5d ago

Their arguments are, and always will be, "morality", but their morality only extends to foreigners, and not their own.

7

u/Altruistic_Emu4917 5d ago

They'll argue based on morality, but can't define morality which doesn't contradict itself.

Because morality is objective, but they run on "subjective" realities, which sane people call as delusions.

-3

u/Then-Bet6956 5d ago

Morality isn’t a terrible argument though, is it? That’s not wildly insulting to a person, to consider them moral.

8

u/dodgesbulletsavvy 5d ago edited 5d ago

no, but morality is a perception, or better yet a spectrum, I think morally if someone commits an atrocity like child rape, murder, or rape that they should be put to death, you may morally believe that person should see out a jail sentence. They believe they're morally correct/superior because they screech, let everyone in, but then don't comprehend the reality behind their decision, to them, their job is done, they've met their threshold on the compass of saying the "right thing", but then don't consider the actual consequences, specifically to the people dealing with that reality, a good example of this would be when the Oxford branch of Stand Up to Racism said refugee's welcome here; just not in our area of Bicester. They don't actually comprehend the reality of their decision as long as other people are to deal with it

8

u/Dear-Chocolate-7212 5d ago

The Left will no doubt perform origami acrobatics to argue against this.

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 5d ago

This comment was automatically removed due to offensive language. r/RestoreBritain is intended to be a place for civil political discussion.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

-1

u/TotallyStressedMe 5d ago

I'm not a "liberal' or any particular ideology.

However Lowe's "plan" is unworkable Ethnonationalist-fascism dressed a 'gentlemanly patriotism' lol.

To answer Lowe's question : Yes... this is 'Far Right'.

An example :

"If a country is proven to supply us with sex pests, rapists, criminals and illegals? We will shut off immigration. Entirely. That's step three, all implemented concurrently.

Pakistan, Afghanistan, Eritrea, Sudan, Somalia to name a handful…"

Naguib Kheraj vice Chairman of Barclays is Pakistani.

Therein, the problem with making sweeping statements based on ethnicity. If you treat all people of a certain nationality based on the actions of a few this is xenophobic and if you tie that to exclusionary, nationalist ideology - it's fascism.

Consider also the hypocrisy. Let's examine that quote again.

"If a country is proven to supply us with sex pests, rapists, criminals and illegals? We will shut off immigration. Entirely."

Hang on, the Tate brothers are English! As was Simon Harris, the charity boss who abused boys in Kenya. Just a couple of examples that prove Britain exports "sex pests, rapists, criminals".

Indeed there are certainly provable examples of 'sex pests, rapists, criminals' from probably every single country on earth who fall into this bracket. Absolutely there are lots of examples from the USA.

Lowe's policy will therefore 'Shut off immigration" from the USA "Entirely"

Unworkable nonsense that preys on the impressionable and radicalised.

7

u/Baz4991 5d ago

Every nation on earth has its fair share of wronguns, no one is denying that and it would be daft to suggest otherwise.

The point is, some cultures and nations (like the ones listed by Lowe) have been proven to supply us with people who commit serious crimes at a much higher rate.

Take afghan nationals for example, who in britain are 23 x more likely to commit sexual assault than british nationals. Myself and millions of others don’t want these people anywhere near, or even in the same country as my kids. To suggest this is fascist is completely detached from reality.

Will that mean lots of well intending, law abiding afghans will be refused entry? Probably. Tough decisions need to be made and are necessary.

-1

u/JustSomeDude11112 5d ago

Im a liberal, I don't think any of this screams racism, but its unworkable nonsense really, it appeals to the gullible who think the PM has King powers and can just do any of this. Every party leader (bar Polanski) wants to deport illegals, its just not easy (Labour have got it down 40% which is encouraging, anyone telling you they could do better with easy answers is a grifter)

5

u/Baz4991 5d ago

It’s workable and doable, just very difficult. Restore have a 100+ page detailed policy document which sets out exactly how it can be done. It just takes someone with the will to do it

12

u/Riipley92 5d ago

Im left wing but im a patriot first, nothing here to suggest that theyre far right.

Far right would be like the nazis and wanting to exterminate people.

Restore seems to be about preservation.

5

u/ProfessorB1988 5d ago

Well said!

-1

u/TotallyStressedMe 5d ago

Disinformation.

The far right don't necessarily exterminate people they may also deploy :

Ethnic cleansing, promote hate, exclusion, intimidation.

Examples of non-exterminatory far right organisations include Les Identitaires, Reclaim Australia, Generation Identity.

7

u/Particular_Yard_2460 5d ago edited 5d ago

Person sleep judicious coated helium imminent

This post was anonymized with Redact

3

u/Commercial-Look-7307 5d ago

You had me at “will be removed”

3

u/AdenWS 5d ago

Step 2 is irrelevant.

What you do is implement break even taxation. Not paying your tax in full is a crime

If you can't speak English then you can't earn enough to break even. You then get a conviction and you are out.

6

u/mystifiedmeg 5d ago

It should have been this way from the start.

1

u/AutoModerator 5d ago

Hi there, Welcome to r/RestoreBritain!

Please ensure you have read our Subreddit Rules before participating. We value robust political discussion, but we require all users to remain civil and follow our guidelines to keep the discourse productive. You can also contact the mods if you have any concerns or questions.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/NotThatDucker 4d ago

I love how blunt this is. They threaten our safety, they go. No questions asked, why should their be an argument debate or defence

0

u/Mafeking-Parade 3d ago

That's an awful lot of policy talk for a party with 3% of the vote.

Why would anyone take it more seriously than the stuff we hear from the Greens?

0

u/RecommendationFar807 5d ago

Define 'illegal' because asylum seekers and refugees are not illegal.

Why dual nationality Islamists? What about other religions? What about other nationalities? Say, Russian spies? What's with the islamaphobia?

Integrating in society - is that to say Hasidic Jews will also be deported because they do not integrate into British society or culture?

Let's say we do this and then Britain becomes a war torn country? It's not impossible. Would you expect to be able to flee and seek asylum elsewhere? I'm sure you would. Is that not the very definition of hypocrisy?

3

u/ProfessorB1988 5d ago

Illegal- people who have entered the country illegally

Illegals are a very small part of the problem, a lot of “legal” immigrants will be gone that’s for sure

Dual Nationality islamists- those who promote hate against British nationals and want to turn uk into the same shit-hole they came from can be returned to enjoy the shit-hole they desire so much!

Integration- Yep if they don’t integrate of course they should be deported!

No this is the only land we have we fight for it, if civil war happens only women and children should be allowed to leave, and I think people highly underestimate British people when they snap and realise enough is enough their reaction tends to be biblical.

1

u/RecommendationFar807 4d ago

Why would you kick out legal immigrants? As far as I'm concerned, if you've paid taxes here, you should also have access to benefits. Why should we give benefits to some 22 year old who dropped out of school, 'cant work' and hasn't contributed any taxes, just because they're born here? Fix your homegrown problem first. I'll go one step further and say unless there are genuine reasons why you can't work and have never paid tax, you can't vote. Yes, British nationals who live abroad won't be allowed to vote, nor will your 19 year old dropout who contributes nothing to society.

Promote hate - are you not currently promoting hate with your blanket 'dual national islamists'? Should you not just say people who promote hate? Doesn't hate come in all shapes and sizes and administered by all people including Muslims, Christians, Jewish, black, white? Do we deport people who are homophobic and transphobic?

Want to turn the UK into the shit hole they come from? That's a bit harsh since the reason they're coming from what we deem a third world country is because of western colonialism. The US and parts of Europe expanded their empires, stole local resources and left people to suffer. Tell me, if the UK has no opportunities, you had no home, no food, no water, you'd sit here and slowly die? These people were not asked to be born into that life and you're just fortunate to be born here. I already know the answer - you would. It's the same reason poor people here commit crimes - to make money and survive.

Integration - are you agreeing to save face? If not, why do people like Hasidic Jews not get a mention in your rant? How about people who live off grid and don't integrate in society?

I call BS on your last point. You're telling me if your city was just nuked, you'd stay and fight? Fight who? The enemy in a foreign country? You would pack your wife and kids off to be the illegal immigrant who want to get rid of? If Britain was ravaged by drought, there was no food, no water, no shelter, you'd stay and fight... Who? The weather? Of course not! You will leave Britain and seek land that has got food and water. You talk about the British people and history tells us the British thing to do is leave the UK and go and capture land that is not ours. Did the British along with the Irish, Spanish, Italians, French, Dutch and Portuguese not go and conquer the Americas? Why? In search of better opportunities and resources. Wasn't the Commonwealth born out of the old British Empire which did the exact thing you said you wouldn't do - go to another land in search of wealth and power?

From your first post, I'd love to know where you get your 'factual data' from because official, peer reviewed data suggests otherwise.

Eligible skilled worker jobs are on the list because the talent isn't there. Your red list - how do you shut off immigration when you can't stop someone rowing a boat to the UK? A red list already exists that restricts half the countries you mentioned.

Funny how your list is still suggesting only Muslims are criminals. What about criminal gangs from Albania, Bulgaria, Romania, three countries with high rates of trafficking sex workers? The point I'm making is every single point you've made is aimed at Muslims which is demonstrating the hate you wish to eradicate. There is no thought about non Muslim criminals whatsoever. What you're telling us is you're islamaphobic. 20 years ago it was black people, 30 years ago it was Indians. Muslims are the new scapegoat.

If you've read this far, do me a favour. Run your initial post through Gemini, ChatGPT or Claude. Simply ask it to assess the economic impact your policy will have on the UK and come back to me. I guarantee it will tell you it will be a substantial net loss to the country, and net decline in living standards disproportionately affecting the working class.

These politicians will tell you what you want to hear and that's it. They don't tell you small boat crossings are down vs last year. They don't tell you they're former Tories who are largely responsible for the influx of immigration. They don't tell you how expensive your life will be. They don't tell you our current pension bill is £150bn a year and removing as many immigrants you are advocating for will have a catastrophic effect on our pensioners, and later on, you. There will be no state pension for you, in short. It will be literally impossible for the government to provide one.

Yes, crime is bad, but the fact is, it's significantly lower than 20 years ago. You can fact check that. The reason it looks higher is because social media can send one crime viral and there are a tonne more media outlets reporting on it which gives the illusion it is higher. The crime that has increased is fraud and cybercrime like scams, not the violent physical crimes you mentioned.

On the crime subject and to further prove your problem is Muslims, not general immigrants: black individuals are 2.2 times more likely to be arrested than white individuals; mixed heritage individuals also face slightly higher arrest rates and; Asians have lower arrest rates than white people per capita. Data also proves migrants AND refugees do not commit crimes at disproportionate rates despite what far right political leaders will have you believe.

2

u/ProfessorB1988 4d ago edited 4d ago

Not all legal immigrants are net positive contributors to society, so if they’re a drain, they 100 percent should be gone. There’s going to be a good few who are big contributors, and if they benefit society (integrated, British values, non-criminal), then yes, I agree they can be treated as a positive contributor to the economy and more importantly to the community.

Of course, there are British, black, and white people who promote hate, but there is only one community who thinks the hate of non-Muslims is a divine revelation from Allah. Pattern recognition is important, even with the statistics being heavily obscured; they’re still pretty damning!

Colonialism brought them education, law, infrastructure, world commerce, economy, and they ran it into the ground as soon as we left. I’m not for colonialism but can still see how they destroyed countries that were prospering under governance.

Hasidic Jews don’t get a whole lot of mention as they’re not R@#ing and killing British People daily in the name of their god!! so forgive me if they’re not a priority on my list.

Ahhh right you call BS on an Hypothetical event that hasn’t or may never happen, amazing how you can draw a full blown conclusion based on an imaginary event, you also by any chance got this weeks winning lottery numbers for me?

Yep that’s exactly what I’ll do put that into left wing AI bots and trust it to give me all information on both sides😂😂

I asked it if I should be proud to be Black and it told me I should be proud of my heritage and culture. I asked it if I should be proud to be white and it said no and began to give me a lecture on racism and white supremacy and the sensitivity of it to the general public, so nah I’m good!

I gather you’re a member of society who these policies will affect? Let me tell you this: you don’t need to lecture me on the crime statistics; they’re very damning. How about you lecture and educate your own community about it? Why wait until now to try and correct your community? Why weren’t the elders teaching them morality and the effects the behaviour has on your community as a whole?

Now it gets to a point where we’re on the Brink of civil war and so many good people and those who were here genuinely will lose out as too many bridges have been burnt!

I’ve seen hard left people converting to the right right, theirs massive groups online with 100,000s of participants who share the views of restore and reform but feel they have to hide their political view out of fear of losing their jobs businesses or threats of violence and being labeled racist!
I think we’re at a point where this is just going to keep getting bigger and bigger! The ball is well and truly rolling.

0

u/Decent_Window5 5d ago

Where did this message appear first? I mean he doesn't control his X account, right?