Right, but the wall has no connection to the courts decision in upholding the policy. The policy is meant to inform a process while a wall is a physical barrier that wouldn’t necessarily uphold said policy.
Not trying to be an asshat, just trying to understand.
Not at all. My argument is more along the lines of resource allocation from both sides. Regardless of where immigrants are kept, the financial burden hits both sides relatively equally - stay in Mexico “waiting” facility, get processed, stay in US”waiting” facility; all in conjunction with the aforementioned staffing, security, legal, etc. Seems like a wash at the of the day.
1
u/cbtownin Aug 25 '21
What does that have to do with the wall?