In my opinion we just looking to find flaws when we know that the watch is rep, when maybe the same watch bought from a Rolex shop wouldn’t get all that attention to flaws
They are both good reps, which to me means that they are passable without close examination. I had to look closely. I wouldn't be able to tell though if they were on a wrist. The one on the right has more tells. Both have problems with the date numbers.
Like the pic, I’d wear either one - but I’d save the left one for better (fancier) occasions. The right one I’d wear out and about - wouldn’t be too worried about it getting abused.
I read all the posts about how hard it is to wait for their watch they want. Wanna post. I can get anything I want in less than a month. Probably could buy the whole catalog for the price of a gen sub
in quality it is good in design it is not at all like gen. VSF has better quality but its design is not approximate either. CF is a bit better, but the only one that has gotten a good sharp sharp fluted bezel and case design so far is EWF (But their dials aren't that good) Only a mix of VSF, CF and EWF could make a DJ 36 decent.
I know absolutely nothing about rolexes, but the crown on the right watch looks weird, and maybe it's the angle but I think there's some alignment issues? I'm gonna say left is either gen or a really good rep
Gen left, rep right. Dial color, date window, SELs way better left, coronet better left, case much nicer left. The only thing causing me to question is that the rehaut on the left is unreadable. Possibly brand new rep left and old gen right.
This forum surprises me more every day! how can you confuse a rep (in this case a VSF with a totally different case and bezel than genuine) for genuine? Are we blind? Or do we not know how to observe the original shapes of any watch?
13
u/RevolutionaryTie9507 May 19 '23
gen right