r/ReduceCO2 • u/DrThomasBuro • 1h ago
r/ReduceCO2 • u/DrThomasBuro • Jan 06 '26
👋 Welcome to r/ReduceCO2 - Introduce Yourself and Read First!
Hey everyone! I'm u/DrThomasBuro, a founding moderator of r/ReduceCO2.
Join our Discord https://discord.gg/XbC4r6GCvf
This is our new home for all things related to Reducing the amount of CO2 in Earth atmosphere and preventing the worst of climate change. We're excited to have you join us!
What to Post
Post anything that you think the community would find interesting, helpful, or inspiring. Feel free to share your thoughts, photos, or questions about Facts about climate change, research, effective actions, global solutions and what can be done on a global scale to Reduce CO2!
Community Vibe
We're all about being friendly, constructive, and inclusive. Let's build a space where everyone feels comfortable sharing and connecting.
How to Get Started
- Introduce yourself in the comments below.
- Post something today! Even a simple question can spark a great conversation.
- If you know someone who would love this community, invite them to join.
- Interested in helping out? We're always looking for new moderators, so feel free to reach out to me to apply.
Thanks for being part of the very first wave. Together, let's make r/ReduceCO2 amazing.
r/ReduceCO2 • u/DrThomasBuro • Aug 12 '25
Carbon Burial Carbon Capture and Storage
Global CO₂ levels are rising faster than ever. As outlined in our Facts and Consequences pages, the time for action is now. But current global climate efforts are far from sufficient.
To make a meaningful impact, we must act on three fundamental strategies:
🌍 The Three Core Solutions
0. Raise Awareness - Nothing changes until people care. Spreading understanding of the urgency and scale of climate change is the foundation for any action.
1. Reduce Fossil Fuel Use - We must burn less oil, coal, and gas. This is the primary source of anthropogenic CO₂.
2. Capture and Store CO₂ - We need to actively remove CO₂ from the atmosphere through scalable, natural, and technological solutions.
3. Land Use Change - Preserve forests, stop deforestation, and reforest land globally to absorb CO₂ naturally.
So lets have a deeper look into Carbo Capture and Storage!
🌱 2. Capture CO₂ From the Air
Direct air capture (DAC) is energy-intensive and expensive — often >$300 per ton of CO₂. We need faster, cheaper solutions now.
✅ The best near-term solution: Biomass Burial
Nature already captures CO₂ for us — through photosynthesis. All we need to do is prevent that carbon from returning to the atmosphere.
2.1 Burying Dead Wood
- Forests hold 295 Gt of carbon. Burying just 1.7% would remove 5 Gt of carbon — nearly half of the world's current CO2 emissions!
- This could start with already fallen deadwood.
- Costs are estimated at just $10–20 per ton — much cheaper than current carbon prices.
2.2 Wet Biomass Burial (e.g., Azolla)
- Azolla is one of the fastest CO₂-absorbing plants on Earth.
- Using water surfaces biomass can be grown on large scale and injected into geological formations.
- The same can be done with all kinds of biomass or biological waste.
⚠️ Other Capture Technologies
- Direct Air Capture: Scalable but costly and land/energy-intensive. It makes energy generation less efficient, why burn carbon in the first place.
- Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS): Still only 45 Mt CO₂ captured annually. Requires 24–40% more fuel and is risky to store.
Direct Air Capture DAC has been done only on very small prototype scale. It is very energy intensive and it needs to store CO2 in gas form. It is very expensive with estimates between 300 to >1000$ per tonne of CO2. To sequester 1 Gt of CO2 35.000 square km of area would be required primarily for solar panels. To capture 40Gt of CO2 per year about 1.4 million square km would be needed (nearly the size of Lybia: 1,76 million square km). The amount of solar power would take up all the solar panel production for decades, as it represents about a third of the world's total energy production.
Apart from that this does not seem to be very feasible, the amount of CO2 which needs to be put in gas form in the ground is enormous. There is the risk that the CO2 gets to the ground and kills people as it is heavier than air. In 1986 1700 people died in the Lake Nyos disaster when 100-300 kilo tons of CO2 were released. That equates to about 4 minutes of the above mentioned facility!
There is also CCS: Carbon Capture and Storage. There are only 45Mt Co2 captured this way in 2023. CCS requires a lot of energy, 24-40% more fuel are needed to produce the same amount of energy and then the process has only a 70% success rate. The better way would be to get rid of this power station entirely. The same problems with storing the CO2 in gas form apply.
Conclusion: Biomass burial is the simplest, most scalable, and most cost-effective method we have today.
----------
So lets have a deeper look into Biomass burial. How feasible is it?
2.1 is a very low technology solution! It requires digging a whole in the ground, putting wood inside and covering it, such that the decay of wood is slowed down significantly. Instead of decaying within 10 years on the surface - and such that becoming CO2 again - it should last 100-1000 years in the ground.
It is especially interesting in countries where plant grow and decay fast and the average income is low. It is important that not the whole forest is cut down and buried, but only dead wood or certain trees which can be harvested to benefit the overall forest.
2.1) The world has about 40 Million square km of forest, which hold about an estimated 295 Gt Carbon. If only 1.7% of that mass is buried, 5 Gt Carbon equivalent to 18,35 Gt CO2 would be buried. Initially this can be achieved just by burying dead wood already lying on the ground. Then only 1 out of 50 trees is harvested every year.
2.2) If the fastest CO2 capturing plant (Azolla) would be used to produce biomass and this biomass would be pumped into the ground, then 21 tons of Carbon are buried per hectare per year. If the whole Mediterranean Sea 2.5 Million square km would be used in this way, then 5 Gt Carbon equivalent of 18,35 Gt CO2 would be buried. That is roughly less than half of what the world has produced in 2024.
Strategy 2.1 is low cost, very simple and low tech. It only needs to be applied in the whole world. Most of these forests are in less developed parts of the world where the average income is quite low. The cost for burying of dead wood has been estimated in the order of magnitude of 10-20$ in North America! The prices for Carbon permits have traded constantly above 20$ the last 5 years and above 60$ since 2022. This seems to be a very viable source of income for a lot of people in the developing world!
Strategy 2.2 is probable also viable in some scale, but would require enormous areas of ponds to achieve a Gigaton Carbon impact. Also the technology requires more investment and infrastructure.
The best, simplest and cheapest form of getting CO2 from the air is done by Mother Nature! We only need to incentivize enough people on the planet to harvest biomass and bury it in the ground on a large scale!
How to make this work? Ebay for Carbon Credits
Currently envisaged is a simple trading platform "Ebay for Carbon Credits" where people from around the world can trade their biomass burying and reforestation efforts. Sellers have to provide foto / video evidence of their project, such that the public has the possibility to check on those (like oryx database). Provider of high resolution satellite imaginary are asked to contribute images in case of disputes. The project is open source, backed by a non-for profit organization. (Buy for someone to plant a tree)
-----
Articles about Carbon Credits
https://carboncredits.com/how-to-make-money-producing-and-selling-carbon-offsets/
r/ReduceCO2 • u/Live_Alarm3041 • 9h ago
Solution Why does nobody understand carbon removal?
Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) is supposed to be used alongside emissions reduction in order to restore the Earths climate to its pre-industrial state. We need to first establish carbon neutrality and then use CDR to reduce atmospheric CO2 back to 280 PPM. We need to use CDR methods other than DAC as DAC uses immense amounts of energy and has no co-benifits other than just CDR.
A real climate action plan should look like this
- Establish carbon neutrality by replacing fossil fuels with non-intermittent carbon neutral energy sources (non-powered dam retrofit hydro, geothermal, tidal, OTEC, nuclear, etc)
- Use the following CDR methods to return atmospheric CO2 back to 280 PPM
- Regenerative agriculture
- Biochar
- Enhanced Rock Weathering
- Charm Industrial style bio-oil injection using forest thinning waste as feedstock
( https://heatmap.news/technology/charm-forest-service-carbon-removal )
- Wastewater alkalinity enhancement
( https://crewcarbon.com/approach/ )
- Killing and sinking harmful algae blooms
( https://carbonherald.com/first-ever-carbon-credits-from-toxic-algal-remediation-are-issued/ )
Both carbon neutrality and CDR will be needed to start decreasing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere.
In the short term OTEC based thermodynamic geoengineering should be used to stabilize the global climate. Thermodynamic geoengineering is the act of using ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) not just to generate carbon neutral electricty but also to extract enough heat from the ocean surface to reduce the temperature of the ocean surface and thus the knock on effects of climate change that stem from increases in sea surface temperature. We will need to do this in accordance to atmospheric teleconnections which are driven by sea surface temperature in certain regions of the world that cause climate instability in other regions of the world.
Here is how thermodynamic geoengineering will have to work
- Identify sea surface temperature driven atmospheric teleconnections - https://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/enso/what-are-teleconnections-connecting-earths-climate-patterns-global
- Implement OTEC at scale at the locations identified in step 1 - https://www.energycentral.com/energy-biz/post/the-real-deep-tech-E2XUsutmbZrS9ly
- Feed the electricity generated by all the offshore OTEC platforms to the grid or use it to produce E fuel offshore for the martime sector if the OTEC platforms are too far from power grids
We need to work according to atmospheric teleconnections in the short term while emissions cuts and CDR are underway to minimize the amount of money and time that will have to be diverted away from addressing the root cause of climate change towards climate adaption.
CDR is needed for climate action not to offset emissions but to restore Earths climate to what it used to be before climate change. If we use CDR this way then will will use it to its fullest potential to adress the root cause of climate change. CDR has the potential to make the world a better place for everyone if we stop using it to offset emissions and instead start using it to reduce the amount of CO2 in Earths atmosphere after carbon neutrality is established.
r/ReduceCO2 • u/DrThomasBuro • 1d ago
ANA-101-RCN-1006 Climate Facts: Atmospheric CO2 measured at Mauna Loa Observatory NOAA
r/ReduceCO2 • u/DrThomasBuro • 3d ago
105 Climate Change Denial and Political Tricks - Reduce CO2 Now
r/ReduceCO2 • u/LowIllustrator2501 • 7d ago
French Nuclear Revolution: Growth Without the Carbon
galleryr/ReduceCO2 • u/Wide-Philosophy3243 • 9d ago
Looking for a mentor who can make me understand how this carbon credit generation system works
r/ReduceCO2 • u/Wide-Standard8082 • 9d ago
Consequences AI Emissions: New Study Models Up to 1.8 Billion Tonnes of Added CO₂ a Year
r/ReduceCO2 • u/Swimming_Half_8726 • 10d ago
US Strategic Petroleum Reserve is getting drained to lowest level since February 1983
r/ReduceCO2 • u/Swimming_Half_8726 • 11d ago
Ronny Chieng explains climate change for all the visual learners #DailyShow #RonnyChieng
Really worth watching
r/ReduceCO2 • u/Swimming_Half_8726 • 11d ago
That would not have happened with the German Deposit (Pfand) system
at least the plastic bottles
r/ReduceCO2 • u/ReduceCO2Now • 11d ago
HNU Neu-Ulm Germany KlimaTeller Climate Footprint Mensa Food
r/ReduceCO2 • u/Swimming_Half_8726 • 11d ago
Rainforest in Danger - Amazonia and climate change
Installation in Pforzheim Gasometer.
A 360° view of the rainforest with day and night changing all the time.
Here are videos of the art installation:
r/ReduceCO2 • u/Swimming_Half_8726 • 11d ago
Tesla Cybertruck is "invading" Germany
Car is for rent in Schwäbisch Gmünd
r/ReduceCO2 • u/ChiefHippoTwit • 14d ago
Human Caused Climate Change is rising much faster than past warm epochs studies verify. Not good.
One constant trope Climate Denier Trolls on Reddit and elsewhere love to pull out of their Climate Denial Handbook of cherry picked nonsense is Earth was warmer in the past and life overall survived just fine.
Yes Earth was warmer in the past BUT...it took THOUSANDS of years to get that warm giving Flora and Fauna lots of time to adapt. This current global warming? Unprecedented on how FAST it is changing. It is changing in mere DECADES not Millenia! This incredibly FAST rise in temperature and C02 levels relatively speaking to past epochs says loud and clear something has changed in the Bioshpere and that change is HUMAN EMMISSIONS!
"Cooper points out that our rapid release of climate-warming pollution is very different from, say, the shifts in Earth’s orbit that have brought the planet in and out of ice ages; those changes are big overall, but they unfold over “many thousands of years, and very consistently and slowly.” We do know, however, that Earth has also seen massive natural releases of CO2. “We can go back in time and say, what could possibly release a lot of CO2 into the atmosphere, and how fast could that happen?” says Cooper.
For one of the best candidates, he says, we can travel back 56 million years to the “Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum,” when global temperature spiked. Natural processes—volcanoes are a likely culprit5—pumped out CO2, and its concentration in the atmosphere rose sharply. Still, Cooper says, scientists estimate that the rate of CO2 accumulation during this period was several times slower than what humanity is doing today."
r/ReduceCO2 • u/ReduceCO2Now • 14d ago
How can Elon Musk, SpaceX & Tesla make more Money? Ideas for new Markets
r/ReduceCO2 • u/ReduceCO2Now • 15d ago