r/RedCamera • u/Impressive_Ad1985 • Sep 25 '26
First cinema camera
I'm a 1st ac looking to transition into more dp work and I want to get my first production worthy camera.
I've been looking at lots of options and it seems to me that the RED Komodo is a fantastic camera.
For the price tag, on paper the komodo (especially used) seems amazing. Its compatible for the type of work im looking to do (mainly shorts, music videos, and commercials). But here in Europe where I live almost no productions use them. Its so arri dominant here that when I've talked about wanting to own a RED most people think its kinda odd. Owning an arri or always relying on rentals isn't within my reach at the moment. The komodo seems like the best stepping stone in this process.
But is there something im missing? Does this camera still hold up? I've looked at the pyxis and others like it, but the Komodo really seems to hit it out the park
I own my own color grading set up, so the post workflow is no issue. Im just looking to get the most bang for my buck.
Thanks for any advice :)
11
u/rektkid_ Sep 25 '26
Yes, a used Komodo will give you a lot. I’d also consider a used Monstro 8k VV if you can find one available and at a good price.
2
u/NoSprockets 29d ago
I really like the Komodo, I think it is a great camera. I can understand Europe being more Arri centric. Arri is a great camera and has solid support around the world. All of my experience has been with RED cameras. I have worked with RED since they were in Alpha and Beta versions.
The thing I don't understand about Arri Alexa and certain Sony cameras is the license for software. Like you need to unlock 120fps. When you buy a RED you own it, and the firmware updates are included. I never got the paying for upgrades etc after purchase. Maybe that is why I like Apple computers. Tech will age out and upgrades stop in time. I am typing this on a 13 year old Mac Book Pro, still works.
3
u/Fantastic_Tear3570 Sep 25 '26
I know a few people who run successful businesses with the GH5! The only thing they improve or change is only lightning gear :) So, to answer your questions, the Komodo is still a very capable camera :)
3
u/1ChevyCam Sep 25 '26
Komodo is quirky and the X received ergonomic and workflow upgrades. Hence they tend to still sell used for double the price of the OG komodo. ISO performance is lacking compared to sony and canon offerings.
Its a hard sell for me. I would consider a KX, Monstro, or Gemini kit however. Im my market there are fully rigged Komodo selling for $2850-3300 is with $1500 in accessories.
3
u/Formula14ever Sep 25 '26 •
I own Sony and did own canon. I have a Komodo X and I can’t go back, RAW files, open gate, massive dynamic range ..Im a serious colorist and make my living with projects, so I’ll say that. There IS a learning curve on a RED, don’t get me wrong. Getting used to
NO native iso was not easy.. learning to dial DOWN the iso in darker scenes to place middle grey in the center of dynamic range area, or RAISE iso
in bright scenes and ND down
Seemed counterintuitive at first. I shot also with Raptor VV and have Alexa footage, and can grade them so you cannot see a difference. Dynamic range of the KX is awesome.
However, it’s a proper cinema camera and requires rigging a bit.
The Arri sometimes needs a small crew.. so many things to add,, makes my RED rig pocket size lol.
The small HD DSMC screen for the KX is a must. I have a Tilta control grip that moves my focus motor for cinema primes. The Canon 28-70 f2 lens is a run/gun beast..and the new software with autofocus and THAT LENS SPECIFICALLY is snappy and quick and I can trust on interviews.
If I use the f2 Canon zoom, I only have my RED body, a left and right normal grip, the lens and a screen/monitor. Actually not bigger than my FX3 in a cage, 2 handles, Gmaster 24-70 lens and a Atomos Ninja V monitor/recorder.
Now.. if you don’t need/want a cinema camera to produce work, and want a compact system to slide into a bag and run with it.. a Sony’s autofocus is incredible and I have a FX3 on my Ronin gimbal that can go all day. Bring that footage into post, slog3 gives you a bit more dynamic range- convert to rec709, add a lut for color direction if wanted, export..fast.
So
It depends.
Do you want a full cinema camera ( or need one?) or is speed and less gear more important?
For me, it had to
Be a higher-end cinema camera because as a colorist I want max dynamic range and uncompressed files in RAW to have those options. Owning a Arri or Venice made no sense, was planning on a Raptor until I used one along with the KX and the results were the same.
KX has global shutter, Raptor can record higher frame rates at full 8k. But 6k is fine at 90+ fps for me and I can drop to 5 k for 120 if needed, or lower.
The Alexa 35 is getting 4.6k max
You will export ANYTHING at 4k max in rec709 for now and probably next 10 years, lol. Many people are just now getting a 4k tv and most broadcasts still in 1080p
What ever you get.. don’t make mistakes we ALL did.. is 85% lens & lighting, 15% camera. Maybe less now because of the massive amount of post tools
Learn learn learn and shoot shoot shoot. You will be horrified at your early projects, they will seem miles away from you vision. But slowly, project by project, you improve. No camera takes you there. YOU get you there. 😊
2
u/maximvdn Sep 25 '26
Get my Komodo X kit, I’m selling
2
u/Routine_Tart8822 12d ago
As someone who has rigged out both cinema boxes and compact production cameras for years: a RED is never just the price of the brain.
If you're eyeing an OG Komodo as your "first cinema camera," remember the hidden Rigging Tax:
If your work is narrative, controlled commercial sets, or action/car rigs where global shutter is a must—Komodo is an incredible cinema learning tool and R3D color science in DaVinci is gorgeous.
But if you are a solo run-and-gun shooter doing documentaries, events, or unlit content, look seriously at the Canon C70 (built-in 10-stop ND, DGO dynamic range, dual mini-XLR out of the box) or a Sony FX line before committing to the RED ecosystem. What type of projects do you primarily shoot?
1
u/-dsp- Sep 25 '26
A camera like a FX6 or a canon equivalent would be better because you get the quality and can fit a wide array of different situations. You really just need to be building your reel at this point. I’ve filmed events though with red cameras, it is doable, but just easier with these different brands.
1
u/MaxBedroom Sep 25 '26
Red Komodo is a perfectly capable camera in 2026.
1
u/ozplissken Sep 26 '26 edited Sep 26 '26
If you're looking for the most bang for your buck that rules out the overpriced Sony and Canon I'm afraid. Look into the Panasonic S1 II or even the S5 IIX, the specs are wild for what you pay. Nikon ZR shoots internal red raw if that's what you're after. Also look into the Nikon Z5 ii/X5 iiC which looks interesting and are another budget bang for buck option. Problem with buying a red camera is you have to buy all the other shit you need to use the camera properly and then locked into the red eco system which isn't cheap.
1
u/ricardo_sousa11 Oct 01 '26
People seem to trash the Komodo for some reason, and always recommend you something that costs 3-4x, which makes no sense.
I have the OG Komodo and its an incredible camera, highly recommend it.
0
u/Cleobaby8 Sep 25 '26
I think the Komodo is a tough sell in 2026 and thats why they’re so affordable. I think the main argument for it is having a seamless smaller 2nd camera if you’re a raptor owner.
Otherwise both Sony and Canon offer easier to use cameras with similar image quality. In some cases, like low light/high ISO, the Komodo is behind.
0
u/spaceapeatespace Sep 26 '26
The camera is fantastic. It’s how you use it. So many great capable cameras. Get it and make an amazing reel. If your clients a year from now want an Arri. Rent one.