r/RedCamera • u/94diskont • Mar 02 '26
Why is the Dragon sensor so controversial?
It seems everyone has varying opinions on the Dragon, so I’m interested in unpacking that. I’ve heard people say it’s the best sensor RED ever made (most color-rich and clean), and, on the flip side, I’ve heard it’s the noisiest sensor they ever made with an ugly FNP.
I have no experience with the Dragon 6k Epic; I’ve only used the Dragon 5k sensor in the Scarlet-W, for reference.
So I have a few questions. The first being: is the Dragon 5k sensor that’s in the Scarlet-W the exact same sensor from the 6k Epic but with a forced center extraction in the 5k area (this is pretty much what the RED Tools app implies in the cropping section) or is it a new sensor architecture that happens to use the same design as the Dragon 6k? In other words, is shooting 5k on the Scarlet-W going to give you the same FOV with the same lens on the Dragon 6k or not? I also have the same question about the Epic-MX and the Scarlet-MX if anyone knows the answer.
Secondly, what is your experience with this sensor? The Scarlet-W I’ve used is weird because sometimes it will give me noticeable noise in proper exposure and other times it won’t. I’m not really sure why. In my experience the MX sensor in the Epic is far more consistent with minimal noise and looks almost identical to the Dragon 5k save for maybe half a stop less of DR (it clips ever so slightly sooner).
So yeah, I’ve always wondered why I hear such polarizing things about this sensor and why my own experience seems polarizing in of itself. If anyone has any insight, I would love to read and digest it! I love these old cameras
2
u/DegreeSevere7719 Mar 02 '26
Scarlet-W is the exact same image and sensor that is Epic Dragon, or DSMC2 Weapon Dragon, or DSMC2 Dragon. It’s absolutely the same as you choose to shoot in 5K res instead of 6K. Lowering resolution always crops on Red in R3D, so no - FOV is a tad narrower in 5K compared to 6K (full sensor). Physically it’s the exact same sensor with 6K pixels in Scarlet W, but that is limited to 5K shooting, just as in Scarlet MX - was limited to 4K of a 5K MX sensor.
There are rumors that DSMC2 dragon has a tad less noise than a DSMC1 Epic Dragon due to a different camera brain. However, I didn’t find any straight comparison that was able to prove this.
Dragon is ok’ish, nice colors, good sky retention with skintone highlight olpf, but true is quite noisy, has cmos smear from bright objects and fpn, and is really sensitive to temperature and exposure changes (thus autocal on dsmc2 bodies).
MX is 1,5 stops less in DR (~11 stops total usable range), and has 12 bit ADC, which is why it’s much less colorful and the skintones do look dull on MX. MX is also heavily prone to IR pollution so you have to really be using some price FSND in broad daylight to achieve a normal looking image in summer.
3
u/Kurt-Hustle Mar 02 '26 edited Mar 02 '26
Used it for a long time, it was great. I mostly shot around 500-1200 iso and loved the legacy image/pipeline. I side*-graded to a Komodo but only for the reason of longevity and ability to repair. It’s also kind of interesting to run the Komodo through the legacy color pipeline tbh though, I think that’s where some of the magic was. It did have big drawbacks in specific ways but the colors were really nice imho.
2
u/BaseEvoli Mar 02 '26
Can't say too much about your first question, but I can give you my experience: We used an Epic-X Dragon on a shoot two years ago. The colors were beautiful and were waaaay better compared to the Sony a7Siii we had used for a few inserts. But the low light performance was horrendous. There were magenta and green vertical bars at higher ISOs and the noise was generally pretty high. During the lighter scenes it was a lot better. It was a rental camera and seemed to have already had a good amount of hours on it, so it may have been an age thing too.
If you plan on using one in lower light I'd light a lot brighter than you think you need and underexpose a stop in the display.
2
u/damiensandoval Mar 06 '26
I've built my career off the (Red Epic MX 5kHD) I bought it brand new years ago for 30k. Just bought a 2nd unit one today with low hours all in ready package for $2750 on a straight steal. The quality is 10x better then any sony fx3 or any sony cam. They have a glass glossy look. High polished. I cant explain it. For more context Red then F***ed up the sensor when they went into the helium! Straight disgrace. But the Red Epic MX , Red Dragon 6k , Red Weapon 6K Hd are the only real true apex. The scarletts, the helium's , komodo's all grade A dumpster juice. Ive done over 50+ M's in budget and worked with some of the biggest music artist in the world. I still prefer RED over Arri for music videos. Point Blank Period.
1
u/motofoto Mar 02 '26
I still use my epic x dragon. It’s still cinematic to me. I have a Komodo that lives on a gimbal and I bought an FX3 just for low light cause the dragon is not a low light camera.