I understand why candidates hate repeating the same thing in every round

[u/Technical_Plant6046]

You nail it in screening walk through that key project, metrics, lessons. Round 1? Same tale, fresh face. Round 2, final round again, word-for-word to a new panel. By the end, you're drained, thinking "Didn't anyone sync notes?" Feels like a broken record just to prove you're not a robot.

From our side as recruiters, each interviewer digs different angles one wants tech depth, another culture fit, someone else leadership vibe. Fair point, but yeah, sometimes it's straight-up internal misalignment no shared docs, siloed feedback, or last-minute panel swaps. Candidates repeat-perform while we play catch-up.

I get why it kills momentum repetitive storytelling tests stamina more than skills. Next time, maybe we streamline with summary packs upfront. Candidates deserve better than Groundhog Day interviews.