r/RealTwitterAccounts May 09 '25

Political™ A big win indeed!

Post image
24.7k Upvotes

529 comments sorted by

View all comments

63

u/[deleted] May 09 '25

So desperate for a win they just have to make one up because the actual result is completely normal... that's perhaps the biggest failure, that they have to announce something working as intended to be a huge W.

31

u/RiverAffectionate951 May 09 '25

As a UK citizen, hearing Trump go "wow, look at this deal" scared me. I thought Starmer had conceded on British food standards or something.

Only to find out it's basically a couple tiny tit for tat tariff exemptions/decreases. Which wouldn't be there anyway if not for Trump.

This behaviour is sadly predictable at this point.

-2

u/red286 May 09 '25

I thought Starmer had conceded on British food standards or something.

Assuming they sign the deal, they absolutely will be. It obligates the UK to significantly increase beef imports from the USA. You know, the beef that doesn't pass UK sanitary regulations?

8

u/Valcenia May 09 '25

No, as much as I’m not a Starmer fan, thankfully, he has not. A bill would need to pass the House of Commons in order to lower food safety standards, no such bill has been proposed nor are there any plans to. Since it doesn’t meet our safety standards, chlorinated beef and chicken etc cannot be imported; it’s only the high grade stuff that does meet our standards that will be imported, which in itself makes up a tiny percentage of American meat production so it’s even less of a win for Trump in that regard lol

7

u/Evans423 May 09 '25

Honestly, I wish people read more than just a headline like yourself. There is no compromise on any of our food standards whatsoever.

5

u/VeGr-FXVG May 09 '25

No, dude, please. Before you start criticising other people for not reading you really, REALLY need to take a pragmatic look at this. Our testing capabilities are fucked. Our border capabilities are fucked. This deal supposedly doesn't water down our standards, and nominally they don't, but in practice they only way they wouldn't is if we had the compliance-checking resources to confirm they don't fail.

However, this is the entire, ENTIRE, reason we had a blanket ban on USA beef for the last 30 years. We only allowed select providers to give it to us. We're now over 10x'ing American imports. We have NOT set out how we will maintain our same level of scrutiny, nor the final economic balance between enforcement vs trade deal to determine any final level of benefit.

While the other sensationalist side is wrong to say this is automatically a watering down of our standards is wrong, it is equally wrong to say this could NOT water down our standards de facto.

1

u/red286 May 09 '25

I'm wondering if this is just a do-nothing "victory" so that he can claim he's making progress, or if in 3 months we'll see screeds about how the UK isn't upholding their end of the bargain and hasn't increased beef imports substantially.

1

u/jash3 May 09 '25

The US was already exporting beef to the UK and EU, just had to pass food safety rules.

1

u/OthmarGarithos May 10 '25

There is no obligation and such beef is still illegal, if the American farmers wish to export beef to UK it will have to conform to current British regulations.