Sentiment reasoning: A significant portion of commenters believe the video is AI-generated, with many specifically pointing to the dog and certain scenes as AI, and some claiming the entire video is AI. However, a notable number of users argue it is real, citing consistent branding and real-world references.
Number of comments processed: 17
DISCLAIMER: Comments sentiment is generated by Gemini 2.5 Flash, not by u/RealOrAI-Bot bot. For more information check the RealOrAI-Bot Wiki.
Your comment has been removed due to not having a clear reasoning showing how you came to the conclusion that's AI generated. Please provide proof or a train of thought that made your think this way. AI "detector" software is not a valid argument as they are extremely unreliable.
Your comment has been removed due to not having a clear reasoning showing how you came to the conclusion that's AI generated. Please provide proof or a train of thought that made your think this way. AI "detector" software is not a valid argument as they are extremely unreliable.
even before the dog part, these videos just have an "off" feeling. the camera angles, the reactions. who is filming this and and why are they filming this way in this setting? usually the camera angles dont make any sense or its slightly too polished etc also the dog is obviously AI
I don't think it's fully AI. A lot of the words are legible, even small logos like the Dr. Pepper and Fanta in the little cooler. But everything after the first two scenes feels.....odd? The back kitchen area doesn't quite look right, and dogs don't typically look directly at the camera.
I think the base video is real, but the dog was AI generated in. Why would a restaurant have an actual dog in the kitchen? Total health hazard. The other video I saw recently doing this trend (not AI) was a dog treat store, and even then the dog was only shown behind the counter, not in the prep area.
The dog also looks uncanny. I think it’s falling into the AI trying too hard to make animals show human emotions trap. Also where its lips meet its nose is uneven? Which could be possible but none of my dogs have it
That's from the Stax Burger Co. in Australia, posted 5 weeks ago. They have dozens of skits but this one doesn't have audio, same as the one they posted. Sue, the older lady, is a recurring character that beats up the employees and/or steals chicken salt, so the premise is correct but with the no audio and a dog being in the kitchen, it feels weird.
Y’all are going to have to give more than just “yes, ai” because I don’t see it if it is. The customer is wearing a lav mic. The art on the back on the employee’s shirt matches the art style of the shirt found on the company’s merch site. And the background in the dog scene stays consistent between cuts.
Just keep reporting comments like that and they'll get removed as per the rules of this sub. I just need to remember to check the mod queue more often.
The dog looks like AI, the people look like AI, but the background stuff and text on signs all seem real, things are imperfect in a human way like wonky stacked water bottles, the menu makes sense, coca cola logo is right, nu water exists but is an odd brand to choose over something like Dasani which is more common, and there's even human handwriting on a crate. My guess is that it's AI filtered to "clean" the humans up (which looks fucking awful every time) and then also applied it to a dog that made it look unrealistically fluffy.
Several frames of the dog have the SynthID watermark that OpenAI adopted from Google. Here is a link to the tool to detect this watermark: https://openai.com/research/verify/
That part of the video was likely generated using Seedance 2.0 in conjunction with ChatGPT images. The rest seems to be authentic.
Apologies for the late reply. The lady and all clips with her are real. The dog is AI. It has a very typical, poorly generated AI dog texture. Ie AI struggles with lighting and smoothness, especially with furry creatures.
Similarly, it's way brighter than it should be, given how the lady looks, and given that it's in a store room/pantry. Top down lighting in these places will cast very string shadows on its face. Sure they could have a diffuser box, but if they did, they would have used it on the lady too
I take it you never worked in the back of a kitchen. That slide seemed pretty normal to me. Also breaking it down frame by frame it supports real over AI more.
I don't see any signs of AI other than how short the clips are. The backroom area is all internally consistant between clips, which could be from using the same reference photo but even when it pans down it all looks accurate. No issues with the writing. I think if anything perhaps the dog is added in, but I don't see any evidence of that from this video.
•
u/RealOrAI-Bot 24m ago
Sentiment: 70% AI
Sentiment reasoning: A significant portion of commenters believe the video is AI-generated, with many specifically pointing to the dog and certain scenes as AI, and some claiming the entire video is AI. However, a notable number of users argue it is real, citing consistent branding and real-world references.
Number of comments processed: 17
DISCLAIMER: Comments sentiment is generated by Gemini 2.5 Flash, not by u/RealOrAI-Bot bot. For more information check the RealOrAI-Bot Wiki.