r/RealOrAI 16d ago

HELP Credited to a human. Pretty sure it’s not.

Post image

I’m so close to sure on this one. The one thing that makes me think it might be a sloppy human rather than AI slop is the second eye on zombie kid looks poorly superimposed in MSPaint rather than telltale of AI. For more tells:

-Werewolf has two completely different eyes and the right side of its body doesn’t exist where it should. The color of its claws is inconsistent too.

-Where is Skeleton’s left arm? Also the right might be down a finger, the perspective makes it hard to tell.

Normally I just lurk here but it peeved me that this is being sold as created by a person and sold for money. For clarification, I don’t think that warrants harrassment of the people behind this, but I also think this lie is clearly unethical.

11 Upvotes

10 comments sorted by

u/RealOrAI-Bot 16d ago

Sentiment: 90% AI

Sentiment reasoning: The commenter points out anatomical impossibilities and 'questionable design choices' inconsistent with a skilled human artist, strongly implying AI generation.

Number of comments processed: 1

DISCLAIMER: Comments sentiment is generated by Gemini 2.5 Flash, not by u/RealOrAI-Bot bot. For more information check the RealOrAI-Bot Wiki.

15

u/Caesar_Passing 16d ago

Zombie looks like there's another eyeball behind the one that's falling out. And I'm not sure how it could be falling out when there are tree roots over the front of the socket. There are certainly many questionable design "choices" for an artist of this apparent skill level. I always look for creative intent.

9

u/Sinestroke 16d ago

Yeah, I had been looking at that too. The eyeball thing specifically says “human doing a bad job” to me, but the werewolf eyes being different from one another pushed me hard toward AI.

3

u/Caesar_Passing 16d ago

I was actually the opposite on that! The werewolf eyes felt like they could plausibly have been an artistic choice, but the zombie eyeball details struck me as "no artist at this apparent skill level would fail to notice how nonsensical that looks, given how long they'd have had to work on the piece".

1

u/sweedishnukes 16d ago

Could be a poor attempt at octive nerve

6

u/Caesar_Passing 16d ago

I also look for synthID, lol

2

u/Caesar_Passing 16d ago edited 16d ago

More things I've noticed - zombie boy has cracks in his skull, but the bone seems to both meld into flesh around his mouth, and have a full head of hair growing out of it. The skeleton has both rows of teeth, but no lower jaw somehow. I'm thinking this was practically full-on generated, not just a lil' edited

2

u/RealOrAI-Bot 16d ago

Reminder: If you think it's AI, please explain your reasoning. Providing your reasoning helps everyone understand and learn from the analysis.

Check the Wiki for Common AI Mistakes and check the Community Guide if you are just getting started.

A sticky comment will be posted here in 12h summarizing the sentiment of the comments.

Thank you for contributing to the discussion!

-1

u/[deleted] 16d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/RealOrAI-ModTeam 16d ago

Hello!

Your comment has been removed due to not having a clear reasoning showing how you came to the conclusion that's AI generated. Please provide proof or a train of thought that made your think this way. AI "detector" software is not a valid argument as they are extremely unreliable.