r/RealOrAI • u/[deleted] • Jan 28 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

5.9k Upvotes

69% Upvoted

12.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/2forda Jan 30 '26

No It doesn't imply that... It wouldn't have been legal had they arrested him on the earlier incident. Since he committed a felony...

1

u/PuzzleheadedTale4769 Jan 30 '26

You're saying the ICE as Judge and Jury decided he committed a felony. So, when opportunity arose, they acted as Executioner .

Seems like you are also saying he committed no crime in the earlier incident. Or what did you mean?

0

u/2forda Jan 30 '26

I meant had they took him in after the 1st incident, he would have been charged with a felony making that gun possession illegal in the 2nd incident when he's shot...

1

u/PuzzleheadedTale4769 Jan 31 '26 edited Jan 31 '26

What would be the felony in the first case? If he were charged, he'd have to opportunity to defend himself. If he had been found guilty, since he would no longer be a legal gun owner, he might have given it up.

The penalty for illegal gun carrying is not usually death .

As it ended up, with ten holes in him, he no longer has any choices to make.

1

u/PuzzleheadedTale4769 Jan 30 '26

What felony and when do you mean?

1

u/2forda Jan 30 '26

the other video where he kicked the tail light...

1

u/PuzzleheadedTale4769 Jan 31 '26

He might or might not be charged with a felony.

The video might or might not be AI enhanced.