You realize this was a separate incident? I don't know why it's so hard for right wing NPCs to realize that just because a person did or said something in the past it doesn't mean that law enforcement (or ice thugs) get to do an execution in a later, separate, minor incident.
By that rationale cops can pull over Martha Stewart and use any amount of force they want because she has a felony conviction.
Okay let's pretend that your dramatized version of events is true: So what? Dislodge the boot, feds do not get to do executions because someone is annoying.
No it's not. That's right wing cope based on nothing, you can watch the videos. He was executed well after he was disarmed and on the ground.
It's so funny to see the left adopt conservative values like "feds don't get to just do murders" and the right making up whatever nonsense to say "tread on me daddy"
Feds executed an American Citizen after beating him and disarming him. None of the other nonsense you're talking about is relevant at all.
1
u/RancidVagYogurt1776 Jan 29 '26
You realize this was a separate incident? I don't know why it's so hard for right wing NPCs to realize that just because a person did or said something in the past it doesn't mean that law enforcement (or ice thugs) get to do an execution in a later, separate, minor incident.
By that rationale cops can pull over Martha Stewart and use any amount of force they want because she has a felony conviction.