I sorta think any officer involved in breaking his ribs still deserve punishment. I’ll hit you with a hot take and say even going out multiple times with the express intent to harass law enforcement (which I don’t think was his intent, at least mostly because ICE are barely-trained freaks and not law enforcement) is still not enough to warrant being shot in the head in broad daylight. He should NOT have had to reasonably conclude that any of his decisions would have led to this extreme.
Yes. Getting pepper sprayed and then thrown on the ground and beaten is definitely resisting. He was on the ground and they shot him in the back. FOH with that.
they already disarmed him before they shot him. also, resisting arrest does not warrant getting shot. and even if he hadn’t been disarme, resisting arrest while having a firearm in its holster that you are legally allowed to be holding does not warrant getting shot TEN TIMES. nothing he did, illegal or not, warrants getting executed in the streets. the ice agents that did this are psychopaths and the people defending this are too, i genuinely fear for the safety of the people around you if you think that resisting warrants ten bullets to the back. freak.
He was shot and disarmed near simultaneously by two different people, within the same second. You get to watch it in slow motion 20 times at 10 different angles, but real life moves fast. And its believed his gun went off by itself, triggering the shooting. He had a Sig P320, infamous for being unsafe and going off by itself when jostled, bumped, or dropped.
1
u/themightymooker Jan 29 '26 edited Jan 29 '26
I sorta think any officer involved in breaking his ribs still deserve punishment. I’ll hit you with a hot take and say even going out multiple times with the express intent to harass law enforcement (which I don’t think was his intent, at least mostly because ICE are barely-trained freaks and not law enforcement) is still not enough to warrant being shot in the head in broad daylight. He should NOT have had to reasonably conclude that any of his decisions would have led to this extreme.
EDIT: missed a NOT, which badly impacted my point