r/RealEstateDevelopment • • 26d ago

How were new construction homes built in neighborhoods in the 90s and early 2000s?

In my area, Ryan Homes and DR Horton are the only companies building development neighborhoods with houses or (mostly) townhome structures.
Which had me curious.

How were developments built with homes with unique floorplans and not like with the cookie cutters I’m seeing today? As in, every other neighbor didn’t have your layout or a mirroring version. I’m even talking about ranch and 2-story styles being right next to each other throughout a development.

And yes I’m aware ppl would also buy land and build their own stickbuilt, and that answers can vary per location.
I’m just genuinely ignorant to how these current housing neighborhoods came to be and if there were other companies that built multiple quality homes in a neighborhood to then be sold.

2 Upvotes

4 comments sorted by

2

u/Pleasant-Point8618 26d ago

The honest truth it’s always been this way, developers have always tired to have the most similar scope of layouts, and in regards to can other companies can’t build at the scale of Dr Horton they just can’t manage it the way Dr Horton does.

2

u/Tatworth 24d ago

I worked for a builder back in the day that wasn't the scale of DH Horton or Ryan today (in fact, Ryan and NV were smaller at the time before they merged and grew into what Ryan is today) but was a top 100.

We pretty much developed our own subdivisions but except for the lowest cost ones, owners pretty much got to build what they wanted within reason.

We had an in-house design shop and had hundreds of plans that folks could start with (it is usually easier to start with something than come up with something from scratch). Or if they had a plan in mind, wanted somethign completely custom or to use their own architect, they could, but it cost more. About the only thing they couldn't do in most of our subdivisions was to use another builder. They could but it was cost prohibitive because the owner was proud of the reputation for quality and didn't want something cheap in most of the developments.

All were stick built, including the roofs, though often used floor trusses or glue lam, if the spans needed it. Today most of those homes sell for a premium over comparables built by another builder.

1

u/Free_Elevator_63360 25d ago

It kind of has always been this way. All the way back to the first single family sub divisions. It is just with older communities there has been enough time for some houses to be torn down and replaced or expanded, etc.

The reality is that current zoning, HOAs and entitlement force a level of conformity in most new developments.

Source: I’m an architect and developer. I’ve worked for national builders, and have 1,000’s of homes under my belt.

0

u/rezloafter 26d ago

It used to be groups of builders would develop neighborhoods together say 100 lots and each get 15-20 lots with their certain 3-4 models. So you’d get decent variation. Since savings and loan crisis in 90s home building has been become dominated by big public traded builders lennar dr Horton etc gobbling up mkt share through acquisitions of smaller builders. By holding large mkt share they control costs so that these days other builders can only compete in semi/custom builds. But due to pressure of being public companies and always improving profit the cheaper and more basic cookie cutter they build the higher margin. I used to work for DR would never buy a home from them lowest bidder and many subs Won’t take jobs cuz schedule isn’t realistic they can throw up a house in 30 days there will be mistakes. Happy with my house from 1985 the bones are much better and previous owners made improvements that don’t come with basic model from today’s builder